Clinical Performance and Multitasking in Anesthesia : a Simulation-based Study
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Multitasking.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Multitasking Behavior and Multitasking Ability, Clinical Performance, Simulation Training, Simulation Based Medical Education. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- France
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
Cognitive failure under multitasking conditions has been demonstrated in various settings, including healthcare. However, in anesthesiology, the impact of multitasking on clinical performance has not yet been fully characterized. The objective of our study is to evaluate the impact of multitasking on anesthesiologists' clinical performance in a simulated setting.
Detailed description
This study is a prospective, single-center, non-interventional study. The study was classified as non-interventional by the institutional research committee, as the intervention consists of simulation training and the study population comprises healthcare practitioners.
The study participants are anesthesiologists, including attending physicians and residents. Each participant will serve as their own control. The study will comprise two visits: one intervention visit consisting of a multitasking simulation session, and one control visit involving clinical questions administered under quiet conditions. The order of the visits will be randomized between participants using a crossover design in order to minimize potential learning bias.
The multitasking condition will consist of performing manual mask ventilation on a manikin while answering oral clinical questions administered in the form of Script Concordance Tests (SCTs). Participants will be instructed to ventilate the manikin with a tidal volume of 500 mL and a respiratory rate of 15 breaths/minute.
Clinical reasoning under quiet conditions will consist of answering oral clinical questions in the SCT format.
The study will use a 44-item Script Concordance Test (SCT) distributed across 20 anesthesiology clinical vignettes. The vignettes are distributed as follows: 8 vignettes with 3 items, 8 vignettes with 2 items, and 4 vignettes with 1 item. The vignettes were adapted, without modification of their content, to be compatible with oral administration and the simulation scenario.
In addition, for each participant, the SCT clinical vignettes will be randomized between the "simulation vignettes" and the "control vignettes," with stratification according to the number of items per vignette. Five vignettes will be allocated to the intervention condition and fifteen to the control condition. This approach will help limit the effect of differences in vignette difficulty that could otherwise bias the results. At the group level, all clinical vignettes will ultimately be assessed in both the simulation and control conditions.
Detailed information is available in the study protocol.
Interventions
- Other Multitasking
Simulation training session during which participants will be required to multitask by performing manual mask ventilation on a manikin while answering oral clinical questions administered in the form of Script Concordance Tests (SCTs).
Primary outcome measures
- Concordance score with the expert panel on a Script Concordance Test (SCT) [Time frame: At two time points: - During simulation session under multitasking conditions - During control visit under quiet conditions]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
- Manual ventilation performance assessed by variance of expiratory tidal volume (ml) [Time frame: - Training before simulation: baseline - During simulation: ventilation only, ventilation plus clinical questions]
- Manual ventilation performance assessed by variance of respiratory rate (cycles/minute) [Time frame: - Training before simulation: baseline - During simulation: ventilation only, ventilation plus clinical questions]
- Cognitive load assessed by the NASA-TLX index (score out of 100) [Time frame: A two time points: - Evaluating cognitive load of manual ventilation alone, before simulation after training. - Evaluation cognitive load of multitasking, at the end of the simulation session]
- Time to answer items of the script concordance test (seconds) [Time frame: Two time points: intervention and control.]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Anesthesiology and intensive care resident or attending physician
- Written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
- None
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
Study locations
France · 1 center
- Centre d'Évaluation et de Simulation Alpes Recherche (CESAR) — Grenoble
Publications
- Sujka JA, Safcsak K, Bhullar IS, Havron WS 3rd. Simulation-Based Testing of Pager Interruptions During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. J Surg Educ. 2018 Sep-Oct;75(5):1351-1356. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 1. PMID 29396277
- Murji A, Luketic L, Sobel ML, Kulasegaram KM, Leyland N, Posner G. Evaluating the effect of distractions in the operating room on clinical decision-making and patient safety. Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4499-504. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4782-4. Epub 2016 Feb 19. PMID 26895919
- McCurdie T, Sanderson P, Aitken LM. Traditions of research into interruptions in healthcare: A conceptual review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Jan;66:23-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Nov 10. PMID 27951432
- Adams TN, Rho JC. Multitasking simulation: Present application and future directions. Med Teach. 2017 Feb;39(2):120-122. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1230666. Epub 2016 Sep 15. PMID 27633071
- Jackson KM, Shaw TH, Helton WS. Evaluating the dual-task decrement within a simulated environment: Word recall and visual search. Appl Ergon. 2023 Jan;106:103861. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103861. Epub 2022 Aug 20. PMID 35998391
- Westbrook JI, Woods A, Rob MI, Dunsmuir WT, Day RO. Association of interruptions with an increased risk and severity of medication administration errors. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 26;170(8):683-90. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.65. PMID 20421552
- Gui JL, Nemergut EC, Forkin KT. Distraction in the operating room: A narrative review of environmental and self-initiated distractions and their effect on anesthesia providers. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Feb;68:110110. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110110. Epub 2020 Oct 16. PMID 33075633
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07615582 · RNIPH-2026-CESAR-FOCUS