Menu
Enrolling by invitation NCT07615361

Odontogenic Graft Obtained From Human Tooth and Low Level Laser Therapy

No phase Interventional Laser Therapy Periodontal Diseases Bone Loss in Jaw Alveolar Bone Loss

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Autogenous Tooth-Derived Bone Graft, Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT).
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Laser Therapy, Periodontal Diseases, Bone Loss in Jaw, Alveolar Bone Loss. Basic parameters: 18 years — 65 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Turkey (Türkiye)
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Use of Odontogenic Graft Obtained From Human Tooth and Low Level Laser Therapy

Overview

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an odontogenic graft obtained from extracted human teeth, with and without adjunctive low-level laser therapy (LLLT), on bone regeneration following posterior tooth extraction in systemically healthy adult patients. The study investigates whether the combination of autogenous tooth-derived graft material and LLLT enhances alveolar bone healing and preservation compared to grafting alone, prior to implant-supported posterior rehabilitation.

Detailed description

This prospective clinical trial will include systemically healthy adult patients who require extraction of at least two posterior teeth with a hopeless prognosis due to periodontal disease, root caries, or root fractures, and who are candidates for implant-supported posterior rehabilitation. Following atraumatic tooth extraction, only sites with intact alveolar socket walls will be included.

Extracted teeth will be processed to obtain an autogenous odontogenic graft material. Eligible extraction sockets will be allocated to one of the study groups: (1) odontogenic graft alone or (2) odontogenic graft combined with adjunctive low-level laser therapy. In the laser group, LLLT will be applied according to a standardized protocol during the early healing period to promote cellular activity and bone regeneration.

Clinical and radiographic evaluations will be performed at baseline and at predefined follow-up intervals to assess soft tissue healing, bone dimensional changes, and quality of regenerated bone prior to implant placement. The primary outcome measure will be the amount and quality of newly formed bone, while secondary outcomes will include socket healing, postoperative morbidity, and implant feasibility.

The results of this study aim to provide clinical evidence on the potential benefits of combining autogenous tooth-derived grafts with low-level laser therapy for alveolar ridge preservation and to support optimized treatment protocols for implant-supported posterior rehabilitation.

Interventions

  • Biological Autogenous Tooth-Derived Bone Graft
    Autogenous Tooth-Derived Bone Graft prepared using the BonMaker® ATB device from extracted human teeth. Following atraumatic tooth extraction, teeth will be mechanically ground and chemically processed according to the manufacturer's standardized protocol to obtain particulate autogenous graft material containing dentin and enamel components. The graft material will be placed immediately into extraction sockets for alveolar ridge preservation prior to implant placement.
  • Device Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT)
    Adjunctive low-level laser therapy (LLLT) performed using a 650 nm diode laser device (Woodpecker DTE D-Laser Blue) with a 6 mm fiber applicator in continuous contact mode at an output power of 25 mW and an energy density of 0.500 J/cm². Laser irradiation will be applied to grafted extraction sockets immediately after extraction, after flap closure, and during postoperative follow-up visits according to a standardized treatment protocol to enhance soft tissue healing and bone regeneration.

Primary outcome measures

  • Mean change in horizontal alveolar ridge width (mm) from baseline to 4 months (CBCT) [Time frame: Baseline (immediately after tooth extraction) and 4 months postoperatively (prior to implant placement)]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • Mean change in vertical alveolar ridge height (mm) from baseline to 4 months (CBCT) [Time frame: Baseline (immediately after tooth extraction) and 4 months postoperatively (prior to implant placement)]]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients requiring tooth extraction due to periodontal reasons (teeth with a hopeless prognosis), root caries, or root fractures, who are simultaneously candidates for posterior replacement with an osseointegrated implant, and who require extraction of at least two teeth.
  • Integrity of the alveolar socket walls following tooth extraction.
  • Patients who accept the study conditions, sign written informed consent, and agree to attend the scheduled follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

  • General contraindications for dental and/or surgical treatments.
  • Inflammatory or autoimmune diseases of the oral cavity.
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HbA1c > 7%).
  • History of malignancy requiring chemotherapy or radiotherapy within the past 5 years.
  • Previous treatment with immunosuppressive agents, bisphosphonates, or high-dose corticosteroids.
  • Smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Turkey (Türkiye) · 1 center
  • Health Sciences University — Istanbul

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07615361 · 85

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗