Menu
Recruiting NCT07614776

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity With ABP 938 8 mg Versus EYLEA® HD (Aflibercept) in Participants With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

Phase III Interventional Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration nAMD

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: ABP 938 8 mg, Aflibercept (US) 8 mg.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration, nAMD. Basic parameters: from 50 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

A Randomized, Double-masked, Comparative Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of ABP 938 8 mg Versus EYLEA® HD (Aflibercept) Delivered Via Intravitreal Injection in Participants With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

Overview

The aim of this trial is to demonstrate similarity in efficacy between ABP 938 8 mg and aflibercept (US) 8 mg by evaluating the change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD)

Interventions

  • Drug ABP 938 8 mg
    IVT injection
  • Drug Aflibercept (US) 8 mg
    IVT injection

Primary outcome measures

  • Change From Baseline in BCVA as measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score [Time frame: Baseline and Week 12]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
  • Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) and Subretinal Fluid (SRF) in the Center Subfield, as Assessed by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) [Time frame: Week 16]
  • Change from Baseline in BCVA as measured by ETDRS letter score [Time frame: Baseline to Week 48]
  • Percentage of Participants Who Gained at Least 15 Letters of Vision From Baseline to Week 24 [Time frame: Baseline to Week 24]
  • Percentage of Participants Who Gained at Least 15 Letters of Vision From Baseline to Week 48 [Time frame: Baseline to Week 48]
  • Change From Baseline in Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Area Size as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) [Time frame: Baseline to Week 48]
  • Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CST) as Measured by SD-OCT [Time frame: Baseline to Week 48]
  • Percentage of Participants Who Met Protocol-Defined DRA Criteria, as Determined by Protocol-Specified Clinical and Imaging Assessments [Time frame: Week 16 and Week 20]
  • Percentage of Participants Who Met Protocol-Defined DRA Criteria, as Determined by Protocol-Specified Clinical and Imaging Assessments [Time frame: Week 48]
  • Number of Participants Who Experienced Ocular Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) [Time frame: Baseline up to Week 48]
  • Number of Participants Who Experienced Non-Ocular TEAEs [Time frame: Baseline up to Week 48]
  • Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Events of Interest (EOI) [Time frame: Baseline up to Week 48]
  • Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) [Time frame: Baseline up to Week 48]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Men or women ≥ 50 years old, capable of giving signed informed consent
  • Active, treatment-naïve subfoveal CNV lesions secondary to nAMD including juxtafoveal lesions that affect the fovea as confirmed by SD-OCT and FA in the study eye (SE)
  • Total area of CNV (including both classic and occult components) > 50% of the total lesion area in the SE
  • The BCVA letter score ≥ 24 and ≤ 78 letters, in the SE
  • Presence of intra and/or subretinal fluid affecting the central subfield of the SE as identified by SD-OCT attributable to active CNV. The central subfield is defined as a circle with a diameter of 1 mm, centered on the fovea

Exclusion criteria

Participants are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply at either screening or baseline, unless otherwise indicated per protocol:

  • Total lesion size > 12 disc areas (30.5 mm2) including blood, scars, and neovascularization, in the study eye
  • Scar, fibrosis, or atrophy involving the central subfield in the study eye
  • Scar or fibrosis involving > 50% of the total lesion in the study eye
  • Presence of retinal pigment epithelium tears or rips involving the macula in the study eye
  • History of any vitreous hemorrhage ≤ 4 weeks (28 days) before randomization in the study
  • Presence of other causes of CNV, including pathologic myopia (spherical equivalent ≥ 8 diopters negative or axial length ≥ 25 mm), ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, angioid streaks, choroidal rupture, or multifocal choroiditis in the study
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma (defined as IOP >25 mmHg despite treatment with anti-glaucoma medication) in the study eye
  • History or clinical evidence of DR, DME, idiopathic autoimmune uveitis, or any other vascular disease affecting the retina, other than nAMD in either eye
  • Evidence of active extraocular or periocular infection or inflammation (including infectious blepharitis, keratitis, scleritis, or conjunctivitis) in either eye at the time of screening or randomization
  • Uncontrolled blood pressure (defined as systolic >160 mmHg or diastolic >95 mmHg). Blood pressure needs to be stable for at least 12 weeks (84 days) prior to screening
  • Any prior or concomitant ocular or systemic treatment (with an investigational or approved, anti VEGF or anti-VEGF/anti-angiopoietin agent) in the SE, or surgery for nAMD in the SE, except dietary supplements or vitamins
  • History or evidence of any other clinically significant disorder, condition, disease or clinical laboratory abnormality that, in the opinion of the investigator or study medical monitor, if consulted, would pose a risk to participant safety or interfere with the study evaluation or results interpretation
  • Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 36 centers
  • Retina Consultants of Orange County — Fullerton
  • South Coast Retina Center - RCA — Long Beach
  • Retinal Consultants Medical Group, Inc.-Sacramento, Greenback Lane, (RCA) — Modesto
  • California Eye Specialists Medical Group, Inc — Pasadena
  • Retinal Consultants Medical Group, Inc - Sacramento - Parkcenter Drive (RCA) — Sacramento
  • California Retina Consultants — Santa Barbara
  • Retina Consultants of Southern Colorado (Colorado Springs)- RCA — Colorado Springs
  • Retina Group of New England — Waterford
  • … and 28 more centers

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07614776 · 20250115 · 2025-523500-72-00

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗