Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07601971

Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Prior Uterine Artery Cauterization From the Origin Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

No phase Interventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy with prior Uterine artery cauterization from the origin to arm 1, Conventional Laparoscopic hysterectomy to arm 2, Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy with conventional uterine artery ligation.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Basic parameters: 35 years — 55 years · Female.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

The main goal of this study is to compare between total Laparoscopic hysterectomy proceeded by Uterine artery cauterization at its origin and conventional total Laparoscopic hysterectomy regarding: bleeding , operative time , intra operative time and follow up post operative.

Detailed description

The most common non-pregnancy-related gynecological procedure performed for women is a hysterectomy. (Uwais et al,. 2024 )In Germany, the incidence of hysterectomy ranges from 2.13 to 3.62/1000, while in the United States, it is 5.4/1000. In the US, about 600,000 hysterectomy surgeries are carried out each year. (Harvey et al ,. 2022 ) Fibroids, adenomyosis, endometriosis, dysfunctional uterine bleeding, uterine prolapse, and premalignant and malignant lesions are among the many indications for a hysterectomy. (Singh et al ,. 2024 ) Traditionally , hysterectomy has been done abdominally or by vaginal route . In the present era , Laparoscopic hysterectomy has recently received a considerable respect as a favourable hysterectomy technique . ( Bartels et al ,. 2020 ) Laparoscopic hysterectomy is a safe , workable technique , provides minimal post operative discomfort, shorter hospital stay , rapid convalescence , early return to daily activities. ( Pepin , K. et al ., 2020 ).

Selection of route of hysterectomy can be influenced by size , shape of the vagina and uterus, accessibility of the uterus, extent of extra uterine disease , surgeon experience, available hospital support, whether the case is emergent or scheduled and preference of the informed patient . ( Panda et al ,. 2022 )

.As Laparoscopic surgery becomes more advanced and widely applied, the absolute contraindications to laparoscopy are diminishing . Patient limitations to Laparoscopic surgery can be both anatomical and physiological .

Adverse anatomical limitations include difficult access to the abdomen , obliteration of the peritoneal space , organomegaly , intestinal distension and the potential for cancer dissemination.

The major physiological obstacles to safe Laparoscopy include increased intracranial pressure, abnormalities in cardiac output and gas exchange in the lung , chronic liver disease and coagulopathy . These anatomical and physiological conditions were formerly considered absolute contraindications to laparoscopy, they are now considered only relative contraindications.( Madhok et al ,. 2022 )

. The uterus receives the majority of its blood supply from the uterine artery, a branch of the internal iliac artery. In order to reach the uterine cervix, the uterine artery is first found 2.5 cm lateral and superior to the ureter before crossing it anteriorly to its medial side .( Selcuk I et al ,. 2018).

The ureter is more susceptible to injury during oophorectomy and hysterectomy because of its close relationship to the ovary, where it lies beneath the insertion of the infundibulopelvic ligament at the pelvic brim, and its relationship to the uterine artery, where it passes inferior to the uterine artery.( Lescay et al ,. 2024 )

Although total Laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH ) is generally safe .There is a potential risk of complications may occur . Excessive blood loss during TLH is still an issue which need blood transfusion especially in case of large uteri . ( Saad \_ Naguib M et al , .2022) .

During TLH, the uterine arteries (UAs) must be closed effectively.Closing UAs at the uterine level or at the origin from the internal iliac artery are the two main options . The decision is solely based on the preferences and opinions of the surgeon.( Uccella et al ,. 2021) .

There is a shortage in data that compare two techniques , therefore , Current study will be conducted to compare feasibility, duration of the surgery , estimated blood loss , post operative complications during conventional Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus early Uterine artery cauterization at its origin .

Interventions

  • Procedure Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy with prior Uterine artery cauterization from the origin to arm 1
    Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy with prior Uterine artery cauterization from the origin to arm 1
  • Procedure Conventional Laparoscopic hysterectomy to arm 2
    Conventional Laparoscopic hysterectomy
  • Procedure Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy with conventional uterine artery ligation
    Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy with ligation of uterine artery beside uterus is considered conventional and may cause more blood loss and take more time

Primary outcome measures

  • Is to compare peri operative blood loss by counting amount of blood in ml drained by suction , operation time between Conventional TLH and TLH with prior occlusion to UAs at its origin [Time frame: 24 hours after surgery]
  • Is to compare peri operative blood loss , operation time between Conventional TLH and TLH with prior occlusion to UAs at its origin [Time frame: One week after surgery]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • Post operative pain , difference in Hemoglobin level in mg /dl pre and post operative, frequency of post operative hematoma in cm detected by us at vaginal vault and ureteric complications [Time frame: 24 hours postoperative]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Age of the patient is more than 35 y . Non malignant pathologies including fibroids, endometrial hyperplasia, Dysfunctional Uterine bleeding not responding to medical treatment.

Good general condition of the patient ( American society of Anesthesiologists "ASA" score 1 , 2 , 3 ( Horvath et al ,. 2021) .

Uterine size is less than 20 weeks by fundal level . -

Exclusion Criteria:Age of the patient is less than 35 y . Gynecological malignancies . Contraindications for laparoscopy as any medical condition worsens by peumo peritoneum or Trendelenburg position as severely compromised cardiopulmonary status .

Patients with American society of Anesthesiologists score 4 or more . ( Horvath et al ,. 2021) Uterine size is more than 20 weeks by fundal level .

\-

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07601971 · Total Laparoscopic hysterectom

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗