Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07601698

Dexmedetomidine vs Propofol-lidocaine Mixture in Preventing the Post Operative Emergence Agitation Following Sevoflurane Anasthesia

Phase IV Interventional Emergence Agitation

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Dexmedetomidine, Propofol, Placebo.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Emergence Agitation. Basic parameters: 2 years — 8 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

The Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol-lidocaine Mixture in Preventing the Post Operative Emergence Agitation Following Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Pediatric Ophthalmic Surgeries , A Prospective Randomized Comparative Controlled Study

Overview

Primary we will Compare the Efficacy between Dexmedetomidine and "Propofol-lidocaine" mixture in preventing the post operative emergence agitation following sevoflurane anasthesia in pediatric ophthalmic surgeries Secondary we will evaluate time of extubation, time of orientation, Hemodynamic variables, Visual analog scale ( VAS), facial expressions scale , Adverse events

Detailed description

Emergence agitation (EA) is a frequent and distressing complication in pediatric anesthesia, particularly following the use of volatile agents such as sevoflurane. It is characterized by restlessness, inconsolable crying, disorientation, and incongruent behavior during the early recovery period from general anesthesia (Dahmani S et al.,2014 ). Although EA is usually self-limited, it may cause harm to patients by leading to self-injury, disruption of surgical sites, removal of intravenous lines, or increased stress for caregivers and healthcare providers. The reported incidence of EA in children ranges between 10% and 80%, with higher prevalence observed in younger patients and in ophthalmic surgeries due to sensory deprivation and postoperative discomfort (Dahmani S et al.,2014 ). Sevoflurane remains the most widely used inhalational agent in pediatric anesthesia because of its rapid induction, low airway irritability, and favorable hemodynamic profile. However, it has been consistently associated with a higher risk of EA compared with other anesthetic techniques (Zhang Y et al., 2022) - (Liu J et al., 2022). Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, has emerged as a promising agent due to its sedative, analgesic, and anxiolytic properties without significant respiratory depression (Zhang Y et al., 2022) - (Liu J et al., 2022). Several studies have demonstrated its efficacy in reducing the incidence and severity of EA when administered perioperatively (Zhang Y et al., 2022)- (Abdel-Ghaffar HS et al., 2019). On the other hand, propofol, a short-acting intravenous anesthetic with sedative and antiemetic properties, has also been investigated for EA prevention. When combined with lidocaine, propofol infusion provides not only smooth sedation and rapid recovery but also decreases pain associated with injection and potentially modulates airway reflexes and emergence agitation (Kim YH et al., 2014). Previous studies have shown that a single bolus dose of propofol at the end of surgery can reduce EA incidence in children undergoing ophthalmic surgery (Aouad MT t al., 2007). Meta-analyses further confirmed the beneficial role of propofol in reducing EA and improving recovery profiles (Liu J et al.,2022) -(Li Y et al.,2019). In ophthalmic surgeries for young children, smooth emergence from anesthesia is crucial, as agitation can compromise surgical outcomes, increase the risk of complications, and delay recovery (Kim YH et al., 2014)- (Aouad MT t al., 2007).

Interventions

  • Drug Dexmedetomidine
    Dexmedetomidine 0.3mcg /kg over diluted in 10 ml 0.9% Na cl over 10 min and 10 min before end of surgery
  • Drug Propofol
    Propofol 2mg/kg plus lidocaine 1mg/kg over 10 min and 10 min before end of surgery.
  • Drug Placebo
    receive placebo 10 ml 0.9% Nacl over 10 min and 10 min before end of surgery

Primary outcome measures

  • Incidence of emergence agitation [Time frame: Assessed at 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes after extubation in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU)]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Time to extubation [Time frame: From discontinuation of anesthesia until extubation, up to 30 minutes]
  • Time to orientation [Time frame: During recovery period in PACU, up to 30 minutes postoperatively]
  • Hemodynamic variables [Time frame: From baseline until 30 minutes postoperatively]
  • Postoperative pain score [Time frame: During the first 4 postoperative hours]
  • Adverse events [Time frame: During surgery and within the first 24 postoperative hours]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • patients aged 2-8 years .
  • ASA physical status I-II.
  • Scheduled for elective surgeries under general anesthesia with sevoflurane

Exclusion criteria

  • History of psychiatric illness or cognitive impairment.
  • Known allergy to study drugs.
  • Severe cardiovascular, hepatic, or renal disease.
  • Chronic use of sedatives or opioids.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Prevention

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07601698 · EA in sevofluran in anesthesia

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗