Menu
Recruiting NCT07598435

Rhythmic Initiation vs Isometric Training for Arm Recovery After Stroke

No phase Interventional Stroke Upper Extremity Paresis

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Rhythmic Initiation (PNF technique), Isometric Resistance Training.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis. Basic parameters: 40 years — 60 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Pakistan
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Comparative Effects of Rhythmic Initiation and Isometric Resistance Training on Upper Limb Motor Function, Strength, and Coordination in Subacute Stroke Patients

Overview

Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide. Many stroke survivors experience persistent weakness, loss of motor control, and poor coordination in their upper limb, which limits their ability to perform daily activities and return to independent living. This study compares two physical therapy approaches for patients in the subacute stage of stroke recovery (1 to 6 months after stroke). The first approach is Rhythmic Initiation, a technique from Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) that uses smooth, guided movement patterns progressing from passive to active movement. The second approach is Isometric Resistance Training, which involves holding static muscle contractions against resistance without moving the joint. The study will enroll 40 patients aged 40 to 60 years with unilateral upper limb weakness from a first-time stroke. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Rhythmic Initiation or Isometric Resistance Training for 30 minutes per session, 5 days per week, for 4 weeks. The researchers will measure changes in motor function, muscle strength, coordination, and spasticity before and after the 4-week intervention. The results will help physiotherapists understand which approach is more effective for upper limb rehabilitation in subacute stroke patients.

Detailed description

This is a single-blind, parallel-arm, randomized clinical trial. Eligible participants will be recruited from Medina Teaching Hospital and The Canal Hospital in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Inclusion criteria include age 40-60 years, both genders, clinically diagnosed first-ever subacute stroke (1-6 months post-onset), and unilateral upper limb involvement. Exclusion criteria include severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale \>3), recurrent or bilateral stroke, shoulder subluxation or pain limiting movement, and cognitive or perceptual deficits. After providing written informed consent, participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either Group A (Rhythmic Initiation) or Group B (Isometric Resistance Training). The randomization sequence will be generated using computer software, and allocation will be concealed in sealed opaque envelopes. The outcome assessor will be blinded to group assignment. Group A intervention: Rhythmic Initiation follows a four-step sequence-passive movement, active-assistive movement, active movement, and light resisted movement-using PNF diagonal patterns (D1 flexion/extension) for the affected upper limb. Each session lasts 30 minutes, 5 days per week for 4 weeks. The therapist emphasizes smooth rhythm and provides verbal cues throughout. Group B intervention: Isometric Resistance Training involves static contractions of major upper limb muscles including shoulder abductors, elbow flexors/extensors, and wrist flexors/extensors. Each contraction is held for 6 to 10 seconds at approximately 60-70% of maximum voluntary contraction. Participants perform 10 repetitions per muscle group, completing 3 sets. Rest periods of 30 to 60 seconds are provided between sets. Sessions last 30 minutes, 5 days per week for 4 weeks. Outcome measures are assessed at baseline (week 0) and after 4 weeks of intervention. The primary outcome is upper extremity motor function measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) scale. Secondary outcomes include muscle strength measured by handheld dynamometry (shoulder, elbow, wrist), coordination measured by the timed finger-to-nose test, and spasticity measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 25. Paired t-tests will examine within-group changes from baseline to week 4. Independent t-tests will compare between-group differences. A p-value less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Interventions

  • Other Rhythmic Initiation (PNF technique)
    What: Rhythmic Initiation technique from PNF. How: Therapist guides patient's affected upper limb through a four-step sequence-passive movement (therapist moves limb), active-assistive movement (patient helps with therapist assistance), active movement (patient moves independently), and light resisted movement (therapist adds gentle resistance). The movement follows PNF diagonal pattern D1 (flexion-adduction-external rotation to extension-abduction-internal rotation) or D2. Verbal cues emphasize
  • Other Isometric Resistance Training
    What: Isometric Resistance Training (static muscle contractions without joint movement). How: Patient contracts target muscle against resistance provided by therapist or stationary object. Target muscles include shoulder abductors, elbow flexors, elbow extensors, wrist flexors, and wrist extensors. Each contraction held 6-10 seconds at 60-70% of maximum voluntary contraction. Patient performs 10 repetitions per muscle group, completing 3 sets. Rest 30-60 seconds between sets. When: 30 minutes pe

Primary outcome measures

  • Change in Upper Extremity Motor Function [Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • Change in Upper Limb Muscle Strength [Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)]
  • Change in Upper Limb Coordination [Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)]
  • Change in Spasticity [Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinically diagnosed subacute stroke (1 to 6 months post-onset)
  • Unilateral upper limb involvement
  • Age 40 to 60 years
  • Both genders
  • Medically stable and able to participate in physical therapy
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale score >3)
  • Recurrent or bilateral stroke
  • Shoulder subluxation
  • Shoulder or upper limb pain limiting active movement
  • Cognitive or perceptual deficits impairing ability to follow instructions
  • Other neurological disorder affecting upper limb (e.g., Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis)
  • Orthopedic condition affecting upper limb function

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Pakistan · 1 center
  • The University of Faisalabad — Faisalābad

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07598435 · TUF/EIRB/ 218 /26

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗