Menu
Recruiting NCT07597356

AI-Based Video Analysis for Motor Development Assessment in Children

Observational Motor Development Assessment Artificial Intelligence-Based Movement Analysis

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Observational Assessment Only.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Motor Development Assessment, Artificial Intelligence-Based Movement Analysis. Basic parameters: 5 years — 10 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Turkey (Türkiye)
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based System for Assessing Motor Development in Children Using Video Analysis

Overview

This is a non-interventional, prospective observational study aimed at developing and validating an artificial intelligence-based system for assessing motor development in children using video analysis. Children aged 5 to 10 years will perform standardized motor tasks, which will be recorded under controlled conditions. The recorded videos will be analyzed using computer vision and deep learning techniques to extract movement patterns. The results of the AI-based analysis will be compared with standardized motor assessment scores obtained from the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition - Short Form (BOT-2 SF). Participants will be classified into typical and atypical motor development groups based on BOT-2 scores. The primary objective is to evaluate the classification performance of the AI model. Secondary analyses will examine the relationship between AI predictions and continuous motor performance scores. The study is designed to explore whether motor development can be assessed objectively without direct clinical testing, using only short video recordings. The findings may contribute to the development of scalable and accessible digital screening tools for early identification of motor development differences in children.

Detailed description

This study is a prospective, non-interventional observational study conducted to develop and validate an artificial intelligence-based system for the assessment of motor development in children. The study includes children aged between 5 and 10 years who have no previously diagnosed neurological, developmental, or orthopedic disorders.

All participants will complete the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition - Short Form (BOT-2 SF), which will serve as the reference standard for motor performance. Based on BOT-2 scores, participants will be categorized into typical and atypical motor development groups using predefined thresholds derived from normative data and statistical distribution methods.

In addition to standardized testing, participants will perform a series of structured motor tasks, including jumping jacks, tandem walking, skipping, single-leg balance, finger-to-nose coordination, and protective extension responses. These tasks will be recorded using high-resolution video under controlled environmental conditions.

Video data will be processed using computer vision pipelines. Skeletal keypoints will be extracted using pose estimation models, and silhouette segmentation will be obtained using deep learning-based segmentation models. Extracted features will be normalized and used as input for machine learning and deep learning architectures, including transformer-based models and graph-based networks.

The primary outcome is the classification performance of the AI model in distinguishing typical versus atypical motor development profiles, evaluated using metrics such as ROC-AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and balanced accuracy. Secondary outcomes include regression performance for predicting continuous motor scores, evaluated using MAE, RMSE, and R-squared values.

Inter-rater reliability of expert evaluations will be assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Additional analyses will include error distribution examination and Bland-Altman analysis to assess agreement between AI predictions and standardized test scores.

This study does not involve any intervention, treatment, or risk beyond standard observational procedures. All participants are healthy volunteers, and informed consent will be obtained from parents or legal guardians. The study has been approved by the Istanbul Medipol University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee.

Interventions

  • Other Observational Assessment Only
    This study does not include any therapeutic or experimental intervention. The procedures are limited to observational assessment and data collection. Participants perform standardized motor tasks and are video recorded under controlled conditions. No treatment, training, or behavioral modification is applied. The collected data are analyzed using artificial intelligence-based methods to evaluate motor development patterns.

Primary outcome measures

  • AI-Based Classification Accuracy of Motor Development [Time frame: Baseline assessment (Day 1)]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
  • Correlation Between AI Predictions and BOT-2 Scores [Time frame: Baseline assessment (Day 1)]
  • Mean Absolute Error of AI-Based Motor Score Prediction [Time frame: Baseline assessment (Day 1)]
  • Root Mean Square Error of AI-Based Motor Score Prediction [Time frame: Baseline assessment (Day 1)]
  • R-Squared Performance of AI-Based Motor Score Prediction [Time frame: Baseline assessment (Day 1)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged between 5 and 10 years
  • No diagnosed neurological, developmental, or orthopedic disorders
  • Ability to follow verbal instructions
  • Informed consent obtained from parents or legal guardians
  • No prior participation in sensory integration therapy or special education programs

Exclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed neurological, developmental, or orthopedic conditions (e.g., autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, epilepsy)
  • Visual or hearing impairments affecting task performance
  • Severe attention or behavioral problems preventing test completion
  • Physical limitations preventing participation in motor tasks

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Observational model
Case-control

Study locations

Turkey (Türkiye) · 1 center
  • Istanbul Medipol University — Istanbul

Publications

  • Deitz JC, Kartin D, Kopp K. Review of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2). Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2007;27(4):87-102. PMID 18032151

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07597356 · AMD-2026-01

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗