RP-008 in Combination With Daily Oral Varenicline for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: RP-008, Varenicline tartrate.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Trigeminal Neuralgia. Basic parameters: 18 years — 80 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Canada
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
A Phase 1/2, Multicenter, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, and PRELIminary EFficacy of Percutaneous Injection of RP-008 Followed by Daily Oral Varenicline in Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia (The RELIEF Study)
Overview
The goal of this study is to evaluate if KRIYA-748 (RP-008) is safe, tolerable, and preliminary effective in treating trigeminal neuralgia (TN) when used in combination with varenicline tartrate. The study will also assess what doses of RP-008 are safe and tolerable for participants and how the severity of participants' TN pain and frequency of facial pain attacks are affected.
Interventions
- Genetic RP-008
RP-008 will be administered as a single percutaneous injection to the trigeminal ganglion. - Drug Varenicline tartrate
Varenicline tartrate will be administered as a daily oral tablet.
Primary outcome measures
- Incidence and severity of adverse events, abnormal clinical laboratory values, abnormal physical examinations, abnormal vital signs, abnormal electrocardiograms (ECGs), and suicidal ideation [Time frame: 12 months]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
- Number of responders, defined as participants with reduced TN pain score, attacks, and severity, to RP-008 with varenicline treatment [Time frame: 3 and 12 months]
- Change in pain as assessed by the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 corresponds to "no pain" and 10 corresponds to "pain as bad as you can imagine" [Time frame: 3 and 12 months]
- Change in pain as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Interference (PI) sub-scale, where 0 corresponds to pain having no interference with daily activities and 10 corresponds to pain interfering completely with daily activities [Time frame: 3 and 12 months]
- Change from baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), where scores range from 0-21 and higher score indicates worse sleep quality [Time frame: 3 and 12 months]
- Change from baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), where sub-scale scores range from 0-21 and higher score indicates greater symptom severity [Time frame: 3 and 12 months]
- Change from baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Neuropathic Pain v2.0, where scores are expressed as 0-100% and higher percentage indicates greater impairment [Time frame: 3 and 12 months]
- Change from baseline in Penn Facial Pain Scale Revised (Penn-FPS-R), where scores range from 0-120 and higher score indicates greater pain-related disability [Time frame: 3 and 12 months]
- Change from baseline in 5-level EuroQual-5D (EQ-5D-5L), where scores range from 0-100 and higher scores indicate better health status [Time frame: 3 and 12 months]
- Change from baseline in Patient Global Assessment of TN (PGA-TN), where scores range from 1 to 5 and higher score indicates higher severity of symptoms and inability to carry out normal activities [Time frame: 3 and 12 months]
- Change from baseline in Modified Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Score (BNI), where scores range from I to V and higher score indicates higher pain and need for medication [Time frame: 3 and 12 months]
- Improvement in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) scale, where scores range from 1 to 7 and higher score indicates worsening of status [Time frame: 3 and 12 months]
- AAV5 anti-capsid and anti-transgene antibody titer [Time frame: 12 months]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Participant is capable of providing signed informed consent.
- Participant must be between 18 to 80 years of age (inclusive), at the time of signing the informed consent.
- Confirmed diagnosis of classical or idiopathic TN according to the criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3rd edition (ICHD-3, 2018).
- The diagnosis of TN established at least 6 months prior to Screening.
- Participant has purely unilateral pain attacks limited primarily to the maxillary (V2) and/or mandibular (V3) division of the trigeminal nerve.
- Participant has failed at least 1 standard of care anti-epileptic agent (e.g., carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, gabapentin, phenytoin, lamotrigine). Failure to a prior anti-epileptic medication is defined as insufficient pain relief despite use of a therapeutic dose for an adequate duration of time or being unsuitable due to contraindications or intolerance to side effects.
- Participant is on stable dosage of any TN anti-epileptic agent(s) for a minimum of 6 weeks prior to Screening.
Exclusion criteria
- Participant has bilateral TN pain attacks.
- Participants with secondary TN, defined by ICHD-3 as TN caused by an underlying disease (e.g., tumor in the cerebellopontine angle, arteriovenous malformation, or multiple sclerosis).
- Participants with facial pain not meeting the ICHD-3 diagnostic criteria for either classical or idiopathic TN, including: trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, cluster headache, hemicrania continua, paroxysmal hemicrania, short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT) and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with cranial autonomic symptoms (SUNA).
- Participants who had no change in pain after taking sodium channel blockers despite the use of a therapeutic dose for an adequate duration of time.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- N/A
- Model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Canada · 1 center
- Kriya Clinical Study Site — Sherbrooke
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07596485 · KT74863-101