Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07595302

Comparing Pain Improvement for Intravenous Versus Oral Acetaminophen in Acute Pelvic Pain

Phase IV Interventional Pelvic Pain

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Acetaminophen 1000mg PO, IV Acetaminophen 1000mg, IV Placebo, PO Placebo.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Pelvic Pain. Basic parameters: 16 years — 50 years · Female.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Comparing Pain Improvement for Intravenous Versus Oral Acetaminophen in Acute Pelvic Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Controlled Trial (PIVOTAL Trial)

Overview

The investigator team proposes a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy comparative effectiveness trial conducted in two urban emergency departments (EDs) in the Bronx, New York. This study is designed to determine the relative efficacy of IV acetaminophen compared to PO acetaminophen in treating pelvic pain. This design focuses on the early onset of action and short-term efficacy, which may better capture potential differences between IV and PO acetaminophen in the acute ED setting.

Detailed description

An estimated 70% of Emergency Department (ED) visits involve pain as a complaint. Although ED practice has shifted away from routine opioid prescribing, uncertainty remains regarding optimal selection among commonly used non-opioid analgesics such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen. Medication selection varies by pain etiology, and among patients presenting with musculoskeletal pain, opioids (40.7%), acetaminophen (37.8%), and NSAIDs (22.6%) remain the most frequently administered medications in the ED.

Pain in women has been comparatively understudied. Pelvic pain is common among women of childbearing age, and chronic pelvic pain affects up to 24% of women overall. In nonpregnant women, NSAIDs are widely considered first-line therapy for both acute and chronic pelvic pain. In pregnant women and in those attempting to conceive, NSAIDs are typically avoided. Observational studies have associated NSAID use around the time of conception or prior to 20 weeks' gestation with an increased risk of miscarriage, while acetaminophen has not shown a similar association. NSAID exposure in early pregnancy has also been linked to congenital anomalies.

Guidelines recommend limiting opioid use during pregnancy and in women of childbearing age. Opioid exposure has been associated with congenital anomalies and with poorer maternal and neonatal outcomes. As a result, opioids are generally avoided as first-line therapy for pelvic pain in patients who are pregnant or may be pregnant.

Therefore, it is routine to ascertain pregnancy status prior to administering NSAIDs or opioids to women of childbearing age for an informed decision making discussion. Acetaminophen, in contrast, is generally considered safe in pregnancy and can be administered without delay while awaiting pregnancy testing. Acetaminophen is associated with relatively mild side effects, which may vary by route of administration.

Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrate that intravenous acetaminophen achieves higher peak plasma concentrations and faster central nervous system penetration than oral administration. Outside the ED, IV acetaminophen has been associated with faster onset of meaningful pain relief and reduced opioid use in some surgical populations. Whether these pharmacologic advantages translate into clinically meaningful improvements in acute pelvic pain management in the Emergency Department for patients of childbearing potential with pelvic pain is unclear.

The investigator team hypothesizes that among women aged 16-50 presenting to the emergency department with pelvic pain, patients receiving intravenous acetaminophen will achieve a greater improvement in the numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score at 30 minutes compared with oral acetaminophen.

Interventions

  • Drug Acetaminophen 1000mg PO
    Oral Acetaminophen 1000mg
  • Drug IV Acetaminophen 1000mg
    Intravenous Acetaminophen 1000mg
  • Other IV Placebo
    IV placebo administration
  • Other PO Placebo
    Oral placebo administration

Primary outcome measures

  • Mean Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score [Time frame: From baseline to 30 minutes following medication administration]
Secondary outcome measures (8)
  • Pain Intensity [Time frame: 0-, 5-, 10-, 15-, 30-, 45-, 60- and 120-minutes following medication administration]
  • Time to Clinically Meaningful Reduction in Pain [Time frame: Within 2 hours after medication administration]
  • Use of Rescue Medications [Time frame: Within 2 hours following medication administration]
  • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score [Time frame: 30- and 120-minutes following medication administration]
  • Treatment-Related Adverse Events (TRAEs) [Time frame: Within 2 hours following medication administration]
  • Emergency Department (ED) Disposition [Time frame: At 2 hours following medication administration]
  • Length of Stay (LOS) [Time frame: Less than 24 hours following medication administration]
  • Patient Satisfaction [Time frame: At 2 hours following medication administration]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Female sex at birth
  • Presentation to the Emergency Department (ED) with pelvic pain
  • Baseline numeric pain score (NRS) ≥4
  • Ability to provide informed consent in English or Spanish

Exclusion criteria

  • Receipt of any analgesic medication within 2 hours or acetaminophen within 6 hours
  • Known allergy or intolerance to acetaminophen

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • Montefiore Medical Center — The Bronx

Publications

  • Committee Opinion No. 711: Opioid Use and Opioid Use Disorder in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):e81-e94. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002235. PMID 28742676
  • Interrante JD, Ailes EC, Lind JN, Anderka M, Feldkamp ML, Werler MM, Taylor LG, Trinidad J, Gilboa SM, Broussard CS; National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Risk comparison for prenatal use of analgesics and selected birth defects, National Birth Defects Prevention Study 1997-2011. Ann Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):645-653.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 20. PMID 28993061
  • Gottlieb M, Bernard K. Epidemiology of back pain visits and medication usage among United States emergency departments from 2016 to 2023. Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;82:125-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.06.020. Epub 2024 Jun 15. PMID 38905718
  • Moller PL, Sindet-Pedersen S, Petersen CT, Juhl GI, Dillenschneider A, Skoglund LA. Onset of acetaminophen analgesia: comparison of oral and intravenous routes after third molar surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2005 May;94(5):642-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei109. Epub 2005 Mar 24. PMID 15790675
  • Singla NK, Parulan C, Samson R, Hutchinson J, Bushnell R, Beja EG, Ang R, Royal MA. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetic parameters after single-dose administration of intravenous, oral, or rectal acetaminophen. Pain Pract. 2012 Sep;12(7):523-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00556.x. Epub 2012 Apr 24. PMID 22524979
  • van Bree JB, de Boer AG, Danhof M, Ginsel LA, Breimer DD. Characterization of an "in vitro" blood-brain barrier: effects of molecular size and lipophilicity on cerebrovascular endothelial transport rates of drugs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988 Dec;247(3):1233-9. PMID 3204515
  • Yazdy MM, Mitchell AA, Tinker SC, Parker SE, Werler MM. Periconceptional use of opioids and the risk of neural tube defects. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):838-844. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a6643c. PMID 24084542
  • Shah S, Banh ET, Koury K, Bhatia G, Nandi R, Gulur P. Pain Management in Pregnancy: Multimodal Approaches. Pain Res Treat. 2015;2015:987483. doi: 10.1155/2015/987483. Epub 2015 Sep 13. PMID 26448875

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07595302 · 2025-17368

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗