Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07594041

PULSE - Patient Understanding and Learning Through Structured Education - Effectiveness and Implementation of Patient Education Videos in a New Pediatric Cardiology Clinic: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial

No phase Interventional Cardiology Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Education Patient Education

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Room-based educational video: Murmur, Chest Pain, Room-based educational video: Syncope, Palpitations, Room-based educational video: Sports Clearance, Kawasaki, General.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Cardiology, Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Education, Patient Education. Basic parameters: up to 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

This study is looking at whether short educational videos shown during pediatric cardiology visits can help families better understand their child's condition while also making clinic visits run more efficiently. Families coming to a pediatric cardiology clinic may watch short videos related to why they are there (for example: chest pain, heart murmurs, fainting, sports clearance, or Kawasaki disease). The videos are meant to explain common heart-related conditions and answer questions before the doctor comes into the room. Researchers want to see if this: * helps parents and patients learn more, * improves satisfaction with the visit, * helps families feel more involved in decisions, * and reduces the amount of time doctors spend repeating the same explanations. How the study works: One clinic site in San Antonio, TX will start using the videos at different times. Researchers will compare clinic visits before and after the videos are introduced. Who is included: Children being seen in pediatric cardiology clinics and their caregivers. Pregnant women referred for fetal heart evaluations may also be included. What information is collected: Clinic timing information (such as wait times and doctor visit length), Satisfaction surveys, Optional knowledge questionnaires, Basic medical record information needed for the study. Risk level: The study is considered "minimal risk." Patients are still getting normal medical care. No drugs, devices, or experimental treatments are being tested. Privacy protections: Data will be stored on secure hospital systems. Researchers plan to remove identifying information when analyzing results. Medical record numbers are only temporarily used to connect survey data with clinic data. Why the study matters: The clinic hopes the videos can make visits less stressful, improve understanding for families, and help doctors spend more time on personalized care instead of repeating the same explanations over and over. It may also help clinics work more efficiently and reduce delays.

Detailed description

Patient education is a cornerstone of high-quality pediatric care, yet time constraints limit physicians' ability to provide comprehensive condition-specific education during clinic visits. Educational videos offer a scalable solution to enhance patient/family understanding while potentially improving clinic efficiency.

This study evaluates the effectiveness and implementation of educational videos in a newly established pediatric cardiology clinic using a stepped wedge design. The stepped wedge design is appropriate because:

* Operational feasibility: Videos will be implemented sequentially during clinic ramp-up, making simultaneous implementation impractical * Ethical considerations: All patients eventually receive the intervention * Statistical efficiency: The design accounts for temporal trends during clinic maturation * Implementation science: Allows evaluation of both effectiveness and implementation outcomes

Interventions

  • Other Room-based educational video: Murmur, Chest Pain
    Video topics will be matched to patient referral reason: Murmur, Chest Pain
  • Other Room-based educational video: Syncope, Palpitations
    Video topics will be matched to patient referral reason: Syncope, Palpitations
  • Other Room-based educational video: Sports Clearance, Kawasaki, General
    Video topics will be matched to patient referral reason: Sports Clearance, Kawasaki, General

Primary outcome measures

  • Physician encounter time (minutes) [Time frame: During the 12 months of study interventions.]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Clinic throughput [Time frame: During the 12 months of study interventions.]
  • Shared decision-making quality [Time frame: During the 12 months of study interventions.]
  • Family knowledge [Time frame: During the 12 months of study interventions.]
  • Patient satisfaction [Time frame: During the 12 months of study interventions.]
  • Physician satisfaction [Time frame: During the 12 months of study interventions.]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

Pediatric patients (ages 0-18 years) presenting for outpatient pediatric cardiology evaluation Caregiver present and able to complete surveys Referral reason matches available video topic (during intervention periods)

Exclusion criteria

Emergency or urgent consultations Caregiver unable to read/understand English or Spanish Patient/family opts out of study participation

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Sequential
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Other

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • Driscoll Children's Cardiology Clinic- San Antonio — San Antonio

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07594041 · DCHIRB-FY2026-11

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗