Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: TCI Propofol Injection Models- Eleveld, TCI Propofol Injection Schnider.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia, Target Controlled Infusion of Propofol, Anesthesia Depth Monitoring. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Turkey (Türkiye)
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider Target-Controlled Infusion Models. A Randomized Trial
Overview
This randomized prospective study aims to compare the effects of two target-controlled infusion models, the Schnider and Eleveld models, on anesthetic depth and hemodynamic responses during anesthesia induction in adult patients undergoing spinal surgery. Patients scheduled for spinal surgery will be randomized into either the Schnider or Eleveld group. Before induction, standard monitoring will be applied, including electrocardiography, peripheral oxygen saturation, invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring, heart rate monitoring, and bispectral index monitoring. Anesthesia induction will be performed with fentanyl 2 mcg/kg, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg, and propofol administered by target-controlled infusion with an effect-site target concentration of 3 mcg/mL according to the allocated pharmacokinetic model. Hemodynamic parameters and bispectral index values will be recorded before induction and at the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th minutes after induction. Additional parameters, including time to BIS below 40, time to delta activity, burst suppression duration, total propofol dose during the first 5 minutes, need for additional propofol, hemodynamic response to intubation, vasopressor requirement within the first 10 minutes, and use of esmolol, will also be documented. The primary aim is to evaluate whether the Schnider and Eleveld models differ in terms of induction-related hemodynamic stability and anesthetic depth during the early induction period.
Detailed description
This study is designed as a randomized prospective clinical study in adult patients undergoing spinal surgery. The study will evaluate and compare two pharmacokinetic models used for target-controlled infusion of propofol: the Schnider model and the Eleveld model. The main focus of the study is the first 10 minutes of anesthesia induction, a period in which rapid changes in anesthetic depth and hemodynamic variables may occur.
Eligible patients scheduled for spinal surgery will be assigned to one of two groups according to the propofol target-controlled infusion model used during induction: the Schnider group or the Eleveld group. Patients younger than 18 years, patients with uncontrolled hypertension, patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, and patients who do not provide consent will be excluded.
Before anesthesia induction, demographic and clinical variables will be recorded, including age, sex, ASA physical status, height, weight, body mass index, diagnosis, type of operation, operation date, and comorbid diseases. Baseline vital signs will be obtained from the preoperative ward follow-up values and from the immediate pre-induction period.
All patients will receive standard monitoring before induction, including peripheral oxygen saturation, electrocardiography, invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring, heart rate monitoring, and bispectral index monitoring. Invasive arterial pressure monitoring will allow continuous assessment of systolic arterial pressure, diastolic arterial pressure, and mean arterial pressure during the induction period.
Anesthesia induction will be performed using fentanyl 2 mcg/kg, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg, and propofol administered by target-controlled infusion. Propofol will be administered using the pharmacokinetic model assigned by randomization, either Schnider or Eleveld. The target-controlled infusion pump will be set to achieve an effect-site propofol concentration of 3 mcg/mL. The induction period will be evaluated during the first 10 minutes after induction.
Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, systolic arterial pressure, diastolic arterial pressure, and BIS values will be recorded at predefined time points: ward baseline, immediately before induction, and at the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th minutes after induction. The presence of a hemodynamic response to intubation will be assessed according to whether heart rate or mean arterial pressure increases by more than 20% compared with ward measurements. Patient movement or straining during intubation will also be recorded as none, mild, or severe.
In addition to routine hemodynamic and BIS measurements, several induction-related variables will be documented. These include the time required for BIS to decrease below 40, the time until delta activity is observed, burst suppression duration, total propofol dose during the first 5 minutes, need for additional propofol, total fentanyl and rocuronium doses, and whether esmolol was used, including its dose. The requirement for vasopressor therapy within the first 10 minutes, including the agent and dose used, will also be recorded.
During the first 10 minutes of induction, magnesium administration will not be performed in order to avoid potential confounding effects on hemodynamic parameters. Throughout the operation, the patient's hemodynamic stability will be observed, and any additional drug requirements will be documented.
The primary objective of the study is to compare the Schnider and Eleveld target-controlled infusion models in terms of hemodynamic changes and anesthetic depth during the first 10 minutes of anesthesia induction. Secondary evaluations will include the incidence of intubation-related hemodynamic response, time to BIS below 40, burst suppression duration, need for additional propofol, vasopressor requirement, and total propofol dose during early induction.
Interventions
- Other TCI Propofol Injection Models- Eleveld
Patients in this group will receive propofol for anesthetic induction using target-controlled infusion based on the Eleveld pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model. Standard monitoring will include electrocardiography, peripheral oxygen saturation, invasive arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and bispectral index monitoring. Fentanyl 2 mcg/kg and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg will be administered according to the study protocol. Hemodynamic variables and BIS values will be recorded before induction and at - Other TCI Propofol Injection Schnider
Patients randomized to the Schnider group will receive propofol for anesthetic induction using target-controlled infusion based on the Schnider pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model. Propofol will be administered via a TCI system according to the study protocol. Standard monitoring will include electrocardiography, peripheral oxygen saturation, invasive arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and bispectral index monitoring. Fentanyl 2 mcg/kg and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg will be administered as part of
Primary outcome measures
- Mean Arterial Pressure - Physiological Parameter [Time frame: Mean Arterial Pressure - Baseline Mean Arterial Pressure - induction 1. minute Mean Arterial Pressure - induction 3. minute Mean Arterial Pressure - induction 5. minute Mean Arterial Pressure - induction 10. Minute]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
- Heart Rate - Physiological Parameter [Time frame: Heart Rate - baseline Heart Rate- induction 1. minute Heart Rate- induction 3. minute Heart Rate- induction 5. minute Heart Rate- induction 10. minute]
- Bisepectal Index values - Physiological Parameter, Processed EEG [Time frame: baseline- intraoperative 0. minute induction - 1. minute induction- 3. minute induction- 5. minute induction- 10. Minute]
- Time till BIS < 40 [Time frame: first 10 minutes after induction]
- Response to intubation [Time frame: perioperative]
- Burst suppression period [Time frame: first 10 minutes after induction]
- Hemodynamic response to intubation [Time frame: first 10 minutes after induction]
- Total propofol dosage [Time frame: first 5 minutes after induction]
- Additional Propofol Dose Requirement [Time frame: First 5 minutes after induction]
- Total Fentanyl Dosage [Time frame: perioperative]
- Total Rocuronium Dosage [Time frame: perioperative]
- Brevibloc Requirement [Time frame: First 5 minutes after induction]
- Period of time until Delta wave [Time frame: First 10 minutes of induction period]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patients scheduled for elective spinal surgery under general anesthesia
- Patients who will undergo surgery at the Neurosurgery Department of Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine
- Patients aged 18 years or older
- Patients who provide written informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with uncontrolled hypertension
- Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
- Patients younger than 18 years of age
- Patients who do not provide informed consent to participate in the study
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
Study locations
Turkey (Türkiye) · 1 center
- Istanbul University — Istanbul
Publications
- Absalom AR, Schnider TW. The future of target-controlled infusion and new pharmacokinetic models. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2025 Aug 1;38(4):375-381. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001529. Epub 2025 May 26. PMID 40421498
- Linassi F, Zanatta P, Spano L, Burelli P, Farnia A, Carron M. Schnider and Eleveld Models for Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion Anesthesia: A Clinical Comparison. Life (Basel). 2023 Oct 16;13(10):2065. doi: 10.3390/life13102065. PMID 37895446
- Safrankova P, Bruthans J. Target-Controlled Infusion of Propofol: A Systematic Review of Recent Results. J Med Syst. 2025 Apr 28;49(1):54. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02187-y. PMID 40289063
- Lee S, Kang D, Song E, Yoo S, Jeong S. External validation of the modified Marsh and Schnider models for medium-chain triglyceride propofol in target-controlled infusion anesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Feb 23;24(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02461-5. PMID 38395779
- Eleveld DJ, Colin P, Absalom AR, Struys MMRF. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for propofol for broad application in anaesthesia and sedation. Br J Anaesth. 2018 May;120(5):942-959. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Mar 12. PMID 29661412
- Vellinga R, Hannivoort LN, Introna M, Touw DJ, Absalom AR, Eleveld DJ, Struys MMRF. Prospective clinical validation of the Eleveld propofol pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model in general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Feb;126(2):386-394. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.027. Epub 2020 Dec 13. PMID 33317804
- Absalom AR, Glen JI, Zwart GJ, Schnider TW, Struys MM. Target-Controlled Infusion: A Mature Technology. Anesth Analg. 2016 Jan;122(1):70-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001009. PMID 26516798
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07586189 · 2025/664