BIS-Guided Sedation Versus Standard Clinical Sedation During Elective Electrical Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation

Official title

Bispectral Index-Guided Sedation Versus Standard Clinical Assessment-Guided Sedation During Elective Electrical Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective, Single-Center, Randomized Controlled, Assessor-Blinded Trial

Overview

Electrical cardioversion (ECV) is a standard procedure used to restore normal heart rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) by delivering a brief electrical shock to the heart. Because the procedure is painful and distressing, patients receive sedation - a controlled state of reduced consciousness - using short-acting intravenous medications. However, the optimal depth of sedation for ECV has not been well defined: too deep may cause breathing problems and low blood pressure, while too light may result in pain, awareness, or patient movement during the shock. Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring is a non-invasive technology that continuously measures brain activity using an EEG sensor placed on the forehead, generating a numerical score from 0 (no brain activity) to 100 (fully awake). BIS scores between 61 and 80 correspond to moderate sedation, which preliminary observations suggest may be sufficient for ECV without the risks associated with deeper sedation. This randomized controlled trial will compare two approaches to sedation monitoring during elective ECV for AF: * Group 1 (BIS Group): Sedation is guided by BIS monitoring, targeting a score of 61-80. * Group 2 (Control Group): Sedation is guided by standard clinical assessment (loss of response to verbal commands and eyelash reflex), with BIS recorded but not visible to the treating team. Both groups will receive the same medications (propofol and fentanyl). The primary outcome is how quickly patients recover after the procedure, measured by the Modified Aldrete Score - a standard clinical recovery assessment tool. Secondary outcomes include patient and physician satisfaction, procedural pain, risk of awareness during the procedure, cardioversion success rate, hemodynamic stability, and complication rates. The trial will enroll 60 adult patients at Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Cardiology Institute. Findings are expected to provide evidence-based guidance for standardizing sedation protocols during ECV.

Detailed description

Background:

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained cardiac arrhythmia. Elective electrical cardioversion (ECV) is a widely used rhythm control strategy. Procedural sedation is a critical component of ECV; however, the optimal monitoring method and depth of sedation remain undefined. Excessive sedation risks respiratory depression and hemodynamic instability, particularly in patients with structural heart disease, while inadequate sedation may result in patient movement, pain, and procedural awareness.

Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring offers objective, real-time quantification of sedation depth. Preliminary clinical observation at our center suggests that BIS 61-80 provides adequate procedural conditions for ECV with propofol-fentanyl sedation, while deeper sedation (BIS \<60) is associated with increased respiratory depression without additional procedural benefit.

Interventions

• Drug BIS-guided propofol sedation
  IV propofol 0.5-1 mg/kg titrated to BIS 61-80, preceded by IV fentanyl 0.5-1 µg/kg. Additional propofol 0.25-0.5 mg/kg boluses as needed for repeat shocks within target range.
• Drug Clinical-guided propofol sedation
  IV propofol 0.5-1 mg/kg titrated to clinical endpoints, preceded by IV fentanyl 0.5-1 µg/kg. BIS recording passive (blinded to operator).

Primary outcome measures

• Time to Recovery (Modified Aldrete Score ≥9) [Time frame: From sedation induction to Modified Aldrete Score ≥9, assessed every 5 minutes post-ECV for up to 60 minutes.]

Secondary outcome measures (7)

• Patient Satisfaction [Time frame: Within 60 minutes post-procedure.]
• Physician Satisfaction [Time frame: Immediately post-procedure (within 5 minutes of ECV completion).]
• Procedural Pain [Time frame: Within 60 minutes post-procedure (after Modified Aldrete Score ≥9).]
• Cardioversion Success Rate [Time frame: Within 1 hour post-ECV.]
• Incidence of sedation related complications [Time frame: From sedation induction to 60 minutes post-procedure.]
• Total Anesthetic Drug Consumption [Time frame: During procedure]
• Number of Cardioversion Shocks and Total Energy Delivered [Time frame: During the ECV procedure.]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

• Age ≥18 years
• Documented atrial fibrillation with indication for elective electrical cardioversion
• American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class I, II, or III
• Left ventricular ejection fraction ≥30% on echocardiography
• Adequate anticoagulation: INR ≥2.0, OR ≥3 weeks of therapeutic anticoagulation, OR absence of left atrial thrombus confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography
• Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

• Known allergy or contraindication to propofol or fentanyl, or their excipients (soy, egg)
• Hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or symptomatic hypotension)
• Decompensated heart failure (NYHA functional class IV)
• Severe obstructive sleep apnea requiring CPAP or BiPAP therapy
• Anticipated difficult airway (modified Mallampati classification class III or IV)
• Baseline oxygen saturation <94% or active chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
• Severe hepatic impairment (transaminases >3× upper limit of normal) or severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m²)
• Active psychiatric illness or cognitive impairment precluding questionnaire completion
• Pregnancy or breastfeeding
• Alcohol or substance use within the preceding 24 hours
• Prior participation in this trial

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation

Randomized

Model

Parallel assignment

Masking

Single blind

Primary purpose

Treatment

Study locations

Turkey (Türkiye) · 1 center

• Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cardiology Institute — Istanbul

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07569016 · 20260404

Primary sources (government registries)

• ClinicalTrials.gov (US NIH)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗