Menu
Recruiting NCT07557992

Reframing Endometrial Physiology by Advanced Integrated Research

Observational Menorrhagia Due to Benign Causes

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Menorrhagia Due to Benign Causes. Basic parameters: 18 years — 45 years · Female.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United Kingdom
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) affects 1 in 3 women and can significantly impact quality of life. Despite its prevalence, there is no accessible and accurate diagnostic test. This research will use wearable sensors, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, and biological sample collection to identify changes in the uterus linked with HMB. The investigators aim to recruit approximately 130 participants across two study sites over three years, including people with and without HMB.

Detailed description

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) affects up to one-third of women of reproductive age, with a greater prevalence than asthma or diabetes, yet it remains under-recognised and undertreated. HMB is both a symptom and a potential signal of underlying reproductive or systemic dysfunction, including coagulopathies, vascular fragility, inflammation, and abnormal uterine contractility. Its impact is profound, physically, emotionally, and socioeconomically, but current diagnostic practice relies heavily on subjective reporting.

Objective assessment of blood loss is possible with the alkaline haematin test, the gold standard, but it is rarely used in clinical settings due to logistical barriers. This has led to misclassification in research and clinical care, limiting progress in understanding the mechanisms of HMB. Emerging evidence suggests that subtle abnormalities in uterine peristalsis, endometrial repair, and tissue composition may be detectable with advanced imaging and electrophysiology.

The REPAIR study addresses this by integrating anatomical (MRI), functional (wearable electrophysiology), and biological (biosample analysis) measures in women with and without objectively confirmed HMB. This approach aims to establish reproducible physiological signatures that could form the basis of scalable, non-invasive diagnostics.

Primary outcome measures

  • Frequency of uterine contractions (contractions per minute) measured using cine MRI (HASTE vs TRUFI sequences) [Time frame: Cycle 1, Days 18-21 (luteal phase; each cycle is 28 days)]
Secondary outcome measures (6)
  • Dominant frequency of uterine bioelectrical activity measured by wearable pelvic electrodes [Time frame: Cycle 1, Days 18-21 (luteal phase) and Cycle 2 Days 1-5 (menstruation) (each cycle is 28 days)]
  • Acceptability of wearing device (usability score) [Time frame: Cycle 2, Days 1-5 (menstruation; each cycle is 28 days)]
  • Molecular markers in endometrial biopsy sample [Time frame: Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days), assessed at Days 1-5 (menstruation) and Days 18-21 (luteal phase)]
  • Molecular markers in vaginal swab samples [Time frame: Cycle 1, Days 1-5 (menstruation); Days 6-10 (post-menstruation); and Days 18-21 (luteal phase) (each cycle is 28 days)]
  • Molecular markers in menstrual effluent [Time frame: Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days), assessed at Days 1-3 (menstruation)]
  • Concentration of molecular biomarkers in blood samples [Time frame: Baseline]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-45
  • Having Periods

Exclusion criteria

  • Currently pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Known uterine malignancy, severe anaemia requiring urgent treatment, or other acute gynaecological emergencies.
  • Inability to undergo MRI (e.g., pacemaker, severe claustrophobia).
  • Inability to provide informed consent.
  • Current use of hormonal treatment, or use in the last 2 months

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

United Kingdom · 1 center
  • University Hospital Southampton — Southampton

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07557992 · O&G0334 · 362221

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗