Menu
Recruiting NCT07552805

An Evaluation of Multisense® to Ensure a Safe Return Home Following High-risk Gastrointestinal Surgery, Compared With Standard Care.

No phase Interventional Reduction in the Initial Length of Stay

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Monitoring by MultiSense®.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Reduction in the Initial Length of Stay. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Clinical and Health Economic Evaluation of the Multisense® Solution: Ensuring a Safe Return Home for Patients at High Risk of Complications Following Gastrointestinal Surgery, Compared With the Standard Care Pathway.

Overview

The SENSE-ECO study is a prospective, randomized trial of 490 high-risk patients designed to show that the MultiSense® remote monitoring patch safely reduces hospital stays following major digestive surgery. By continuously tracking vital signs for five days at home, the device aims to maintain clinical safety and quality of life while decreasing overall healthcare costs for the French medical system.

Detailed description

SENSE-ECO study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized open-label trial designed to evaluate the clinical and medico-economic impact of the MultiSense® remote monitoring solution for 490 high-risk patients (ASA 2 or 3) undergoing major digestive surgery. The primary objective is to demonstrate that using this Class IIa wearable patch to monitor vital signs-such as heart rate, $SpO\_2$, and respiratory rate-allows for a reduced initial hospital stay without increasing 30-day morbidity compared to standard care. In the experimental group, patients are equipped with the device 12 to 24 hours before discharge to continue continuous home monitoring for five days, while the study also assesses secondary factors including cost-effectiveness for the French healthcare system, patient quality of life via the fQoR-15 questionnaire, and organizational workload for medical staff. Conducted across five centers under the coordination of Dr. Ugo Marchese.

Interventions

  • Device Monitoring by MultiSense®
    The MultiSense device will be placed on the patient's back and will allow physicians to remotely monitor six biological parameters

Primary outcome measures

  • Mean CCI score of the Detailed Complications Index, calculated on the basis of complications recorded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification over a 30 day postoperative period for each of the two groups: the MultiSense group and Standard group [Time frame: 30 days]
  • The average length of the initial stay for both groups [Time frame: Up to 30 days]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
  • Average CCI score from the Detailed Complications Index, calculated based on complications recorded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification over 8days, 15days, 30days and 90days post-surgery for each of the two groups: MultiSense® grp & Standad grp [Time frame: 8days, 15days, 30days and 90days]
  • Average number of deaths in each arm over 8 days, 15 days, 30 days and 90 days [Time frame: 8 days, 15 days, 30 days and 90 days]
  • Average total cumulative length of stay over 30 days [Time frame: 30 days]
  • Average number of hospital readmissions among patients receiving MultiSense® compared with patients receiving standard care, over a 30 days period; severity of the patient at readmission assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification [Time frame: 30 days]
  • Patient quality of life scores assessed at baseline, on discharge from hospital and at 30 days using the fQoR-15 questionnaire [Time frame: 30 days]
  • Total 30-day healthcare costs (€) and cost-effectiveness comparing outcome differences between groups, including morbidity, length of stay, readmissions, patient severity, staff satisfaction, quality of life, and organisational impact. [Time frame: 30 days]
  • Net benefit to the healthcare system (€) from the roll-out of the Multisense solution in France (difference between incurred and avoided costs) over 4 years [Time frame: 4 years]
  • Average daily time (hours and minutes) spent on the platform by the remote monitoring team to monitor patients in the MultiSense group (collected via the MultiSense platform) [Time frame: Daily during the 5 days remote monitoring period following hospital discharge]
  • Average number of incoming and outgoing calls per patient in both groups within 30 days of surgery [Time frame: 30 days]
  • Table of activities and stakeholders enabling a comprehensive identification of the roles of the various parties involved in post-operative monitoring within each group [Time frame: Up to 30 days post-surgery]
  • Levels of satisfaction 30 days post-operation, as reported by healthcare professionals (surgeons and paramedical staff involved in patient follow-up) and by patients, assessed using ad hoc questionnaires designed for the study [Time frame: 30 day]
  • Assessment of the usability of the MultiSense® solution for healthcare professionals involved in post-operative follow-up, using the F-SUS scale completed at the end of the study [Time frame: 18 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults (aged 18 and over)
  • Patients scheduled for gastrointestinal surgery :
  • Major gastrointestinal cancer surgery (pancreas, liver, stomach, oesophagus, rectum)
  • Colorectal surgery (rectal resection, surgery on the rectum and anus other than rectal resection, minor or major surgery on the small intestine and colon)
  • Patients in non-critical care with a high risk of post-surgical complications (ASA score 2 or 3)
  • Patients who have a personal mobile phone and Wi-Fi connectivity at home
  • Patients who provide written informed consent to participate in the study
  • Patients who are members of or beneficiaries of a social security scheme
  • Patients who are proficient in French

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with a contraindication to the use of the device as described in the instructions for use (in particular: known skin allergy to adhesives or silicone, active implantable medical device such as a pacemaker or defibrillator, need for an MRI scan during the intended use of the device, intended application site of the device being tattooed, infected, ulcerated or damaged)
  • Any other condition which, in the investigator's opinion, would compromise the patient's safety or prevent compliance with the requirements of the protocol
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patient
  • Adult under legal protection (under guardianship, curatorship or judicial protection)
  • Patient already participating in a clinical trial

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Other

Study locations

France · 5 centers
  • CHU de Nice — Nice
  • CHU de Besançon — Besançon
  • CHU Charles-Nicolle — Rouen
  • CHU Amiens-Picardie — Amiens
  • Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP Centre — Paris

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07552805 · 2025 - 01

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗