Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07547449

Bachmann Bundle Pacing for Prevention of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure

No phase Interventional Heart Failure Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Cardiac Insufficiency

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Bachmann Bundle Pacing, Right Atrial Appendage Pacing.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Heart Failure, Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Cardiac Insufficiency. Basic parameters: 18 years — 70 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
China
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Clinical Efficacy of Bachmann Bundle Pacing on New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Cardiac Insufficiency

Overview

This is a multi-center, prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bachmann bundle pacing (BBP) in preventing new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with chronic cardiac insufficiency who have indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy with left bundle branch pacing (CRT/LBBP) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. A total of 110 eligible patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to the BBP group or the traditional right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing group. All patients will receive guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for at least 3 months and standardized follow-up for 12 months after device implantation. The primary endpoint is the incidence of new-onset AF within 12 months after implantation. Secondary endpoints include time to first new-onset AF, procedural success rate, changes in cardiac function parameters, and incidence of adverse events. This study aims to provide high-level evidence-based medical evidence for BBP as a new atrial pacing strategy to prevent AF in heart failure patients.

Detailed description

Background Chronic heart failure (HF) is a prevalent and prognostically poor cardiovascular disorder, with atrial fibrillation (AF) being the most common arrhythmia comorbid with HF. The bidirectional interaction between HF and AF forms a vicious cycle, significantly elevating the risks of mortality, hospitalization, and stroke in affected patients. Epidemiological data indicate that the cumulative incidence of AF following pacemaker implantation reaches 30-40%, a rate markedly higher than that in the general population without pacemaker implantation.

Traditional right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing, the most widely used clinical atrial pacing approach, induces prolonged interatrial conduction, asynchronous atrial contraction, and hemodynamic perturbations, which predispose patients to AF. The Bachmann bundle represents the most physiological atrial pacing site; pacing in this region achieves synchronous activation of the left and right atria, producing a narrower P wave compared with sinus rhythm and traditional RAA pacing. While prior studies have suggested that Bachmann bundle pacing (BBP) may reduce the recurrence and progression of atrial arrhythmias, there remains a paucity of prospective randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of BBP in preventing new-onset AF in HF patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy with left bundle branch pacing (CRT/LBBP) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation.

Study Objectives The primary objective of this study is to determine whether BBP reduces the incidence of new-onset AF within 12 months of device implantation, compared with traditional RAA pacing, in HF patients with indications for CRT/LBBP or ICD implantation. Secondary objectives include evaluating the impact of BBP on the time to first new-onset AF, procedural safety, cardiac function parameters, electrophysiological indices, and clinical adverse events (including HF rehospitalization, all-cause death, and stroke) during the 12-month follow-up period.

Study Procedures

1. Screening and Baseline Assessment Eligible patients are identified per predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Following written informed consent, baseline data are collected, including demographic characteristics, medical history, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), 24-hour Holter monitoring, transthoracic echocardiography, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, 6-minute walk test results, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. 2. Randomization Patients are stratified by implant device type (CRT/LBBP or ICD) and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the BBP group or the RAA pacing group via a central randomization system. 3. Intervention Patients in the BBP group undergo atrial lead implantation at the Bachmann bundle region, identified via anatomical localization and intracardiac electrogram recording. Successful BBP is defined by characteristic ECG changes: a positive P wave in leads I, II, III, and aVF; a biphasic or negative P wave in lead V1; a P wave duration narrowed by \>10 ms compared with baseline (in patients with pre-existing interatrial block); and documentation of the Bachmann bundle potential. If BBP implantation fails, the patient is immediately converted to RAA pacing, with the cause of failure recorded in detail. Intraoperative pacing parameters (threshold, sensing, impedance) are monitored in both groups. 4. Follow-up All patients undergo follow-up assessments at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months post-implantation. Follow-up evaluations include ECG, 24-hour Holter monitoring, pacemaker programming, echocardiography, NYHA classification reassessment, 6-minute walk test, NT-proBNP measurement, medication adjustment tracking, and adverse event reporting. 5. Statistical Analysis All data are analyzed in accordance with the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. The primary endpoint is compared using analysis of covariance, and the time to first new-onset AF is evaluated via the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank testing. Continuous variables are compared using the t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, while categorical variables are analyzed with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A two-sided P value \< 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Interventions

  • Procedure Bachmann Bundle Pacing
    A minimally invasive endocardial pacing procedure where an atrial lead is placed at the Bachmann bundle region (located at the junction of the right atrium and left atrial appendage) under fluoroscopic and intracardiac electrogram guidance. Successful implantation is confirmed by characteristic ECG changes (positive P wave in leads I/II/III/aVF, biphasic/negative P wave in V1, P wave duration reduction \>10 ms in patients with interatrial block) and recording of the Bachmann bundle potential.
  • Procedure Right Atrial Appendage Pacing
    The standard clinical atrial pacing procedure where an atrial lead is implanted in the right atrial appendage via transvenous access, guided by fluoroscopy. Pacing parameters (threshold, sensing, impedance) are optimized intraoperatively to ensure stable atrial capture, consistent with current clinical practice guidelines for cardiac pacing in heart failure patients.

Primary outcome measures

  • Incidence of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation [Time frame: 12 months after device implantation]
  • Time to Onset of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Post-Device Implantation [Time frame: Up to 12 months after device implantation]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
  • Immediate Success Rate of Bachmann Bundle Pacing and Perioperative Complication Rate [Time frame: Intraoperatively (success rate) and 30 days post-implantation (perioperative complications)]
  • Absolute and percentage change in left atrial diameter/volume index from baseline to 12 months [Time frame: Baseline and 12 months after device implantation]
  • Change in mitral/tricuspid regurgitation grade from baseline to 12 months [Time frame: Baseline and 12 months after device implantation]
  • Absolute change in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) from baseline to 12 months [Time frame: Baseline and 12 months after device implantation]
  • Absolute change in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) from baseline to 12 months [Time frame: Baseline and 12 months after device implantation]
  • Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class from baseline to 12 months [Time frame: Baseline and 12 months after device implantation]
  • Absolute change in 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance from baseline to 12 months [Time frame: Baseline and 12 months after device implantation]
  • Absolute change in plasma NT-ProBNP level from baseline to 12 months [Time frame: Baseline and 12 months after device implantation]
  • Comparison of P-wave duration from baseline to 12 months [Time frame: Baseline and 12 months after device implantation]
  • Comparison of P-wave amplitude from baseline to 12 months [Time frame: Baseline and 12 months after device implantation]
  • Comparison of P-wave vector from baseline to 12 months [Time frame: Baseline and 12 months after device implantation]
  • Prevalence of interatrial block at baseline and 12 months [Time frame: Baseline and 12 months after device implantation]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged between 18 and 70 years old;
  • Diagnosis of chronic cardiac insufficiency according to current guidelines, and received guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for at least 3 months;
  • Have indications for CRT/LBBP or ICD implantation, and expected atrial pacing ratio > 20%, including: Sinus rhythm, QRS duration > 120ms, LBBB, LVEF ≤ 35% with symptomatic heart failure; Sinus rhythm, QRS duration ≥ 150ms, non-LBBB, LVEF ≤ 35% with symptomatic heart failure; Sinus rhythm, QRS duration > 120ms, LBBB, LVEF 36%-50% with symptomatic heart failure; Symptomatic heart failure with LVEF ≤ 50% and expected ventricular pacing ratio > 20%; Symptomatic heart failure with LVEF ≤ 50% requiring ICD implantation for primary or secondary sudden death prevention, with atrial pacing indication due to sinus bradycardia or expected atrial pacing ratio > 20%;
  • Patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy requiring upgrade therapy, in sinus rhythm, and requiring reimplantation of atrial lead;
  • Signed written informed consent form approved by the ethics committee.

Exclusion criteria

  • Expected survival time less than 12 months;
  • Status after mechanical tricuspid valve replacement, or congenital heart disease (including dextrocardia, transposition of great arteries, single left persistent superior vena cava);
  • Previous history of atrial fibrillation;
  • Previous cardiac surgery, or requiring surgical treatment for severe structural heart disease within 1 year;
  • Pregnancy, planned pregnancy, or heart transplantation;
  • Patient refusal to participate in the study.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Prevention

Study locations

China · 1 center
  • Fuwai Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences — Beijing

Publications

  • Subramanian M, Yalagudri S, Saggu D, Singh J, Bootla D, Krishnamoorthy P, Chennapragda S, Narasimhan C. Electrogram-guided Bachmann bundle area pacing to correct interatrial block: Initial experience, safety, and feasibility. Heart Rhythm. 2025 Apr;22(4):1064-1070. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.08.024. Epub 2024 Aug 20. PMID 39168297
  • Lustgarten DL, Habel N, Sanchez-Quintana D, Winget J, Correa de Sa D, Lobel R, Thompson N, Infeld M, Meyer M. Bachmann bundle pacing. Heart Rhythm. 2024 Sep;21(9):1711-1717. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.03.1786. Epub 2024 Mar 27. No abstract available. PMID 38552731
  • Infeld M, Nicoli CD, Meagher S, Tompkins BJ, Wayne S, Irvine B, Betageri O, Habel N, Till S, Lobel J, Meyer M, Lustgarten DL. Clinical impact of Bachmann's bundle pacing defined by electrocardiographic criteria on atrial arrhythmia outcomes. Europace. 2022 Oct 13;24(9):1460-1468. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac029. PMID 35304608
  • Bailin SJ, Adler S, Giudici M. Prevention of chronic atrial fibrillation by pacing in the region of Bachmann's bundle: results of a multicenter randomized trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001 Aug;12(8):912-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00912.x. PMID 11513442

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07547449 · 2025-2951

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗