Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07544927

Clinical Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Scoring System for the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) in Patients With Stroke

Observational Stroke

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Stroke. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

This study aims to validate the clinical performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based automatic scoring system for the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The core comparison is the consistency and accuracy between the AI-generated scores and standardized manual mRS follow-up assessments performed by trained professionals. The goal is to provide a convenient, efficient, and objective tool for stroke prognosis assessment, reduce the subjective variability of manual scoring, and optimize the stroke follow-up workflow.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, multicenter, observational study designed to validate the diagnostic performance of an AI-based automated scoring system for the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) in patients with stroke. The primary objective is to evaluate the agreement between AI-generated mRS scores and standardized manual assessments conducted by trained clinicians. Secondary endpoints include the system's sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in classifying functional outcomes.

Primary outcome measures

  • Agreement Between Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based and Manual Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Assessments [Time frame: 7 days post-discharge or post-outpatient visit, ± 2 days]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • Agreement Between AI-based and Manual Assessments of Dichotomized Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) [Time frame: 7 days post-discharge or post-outpatient visit, ± 2 days]
  • Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement Between AI and Manual Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Scores [Time frame: 7 days post-discharge or post-outpatient visit, ± 2 days]
  • Diagnostic Performance of AI-Based vs. Manual Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Dichotomization [Time frame: 7 days post-discharge or post-outpatient visit, ± 2 days]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years, male or female.
  • Clinically diagnosed with stroke, and confirmed by cranial CT/MRI to have stroke.
  • Clinically stable, with basic communication ability at discharge or outpatient visit. The patient or a fixed family caregiver is able to cooperate with telephone follow-up at 1 week after discharge or outpatient visit.
  • Signed informed consent by the patient or their legally authorized representative.

Exclusion criteria

  • Neurological deficits caused by non-stroke etiologies (e.g., brain tumor, traumatic brain injury, encephalitis).
  • Presence of severe disturbance of consciousness, severe cognitive impairment, psychiatric disorders, or global aphasia at discharge/outpatient visit, preventing effective communication; neither the patient nor family can cooperate with follow-up or assessment.
  • Combined with severe multi-organ failure (e.g., cardiac, hepatic, renal, respiratory), with an expected survival of less than 1 month, making completion of the 1-week follow-up impossible.
  • Long-term bedridden without a fixed caregiver, with no confirmed contact for follow-up, or refusal to participate in telephone follow-up and mRS assessment.
  • Incomplete clinical data, preventing baseline data collection.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07544927 · qingfeng ma AI mRS

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗