Implementing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in a Rehabilitation Setting
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Aphasia, Stroke. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Implementing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in an Acute Rehabilitation Setting
Overview
This study looks at whether transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) can be effectively implemented in inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation settings during routine speech therapy for people who recently had a stroke and now have aphasia (difficulty speaking or understanding language)
Detailed description
Aphasia affects many stroke survivors and can impact communication, independence, and quality of life. Speech therapy helps, but recovery can be slow. Earlier research in people with long-term aphasia shows that adding gentle brain stimulation (tDCS) can improve both speech and comprehension when paired with language therapy. This study will explore how well tDCS can be integrated into everyday care for patients who are still early in their recovery.
Before starting the study, identified Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP) will be trained for the use of tDCS (BrainDriver v2.1 device, that has already been approved by Casa Colina Infection Control). The following workflow will be used for tDCS implementation with the SLP team: 1) Upon speech assessment, the SLP team will determine if an adult stroke patient meets criteria for aphasia, 2) Within 3 days, communication order will be obtained from physician for tDCS, 3) The tDCS equipment will be reserved for each session, 4) Equipment to be maintained in a locked cabinet, 4) tDCS equipment will be cleaned after each use, 5) patient label will be affixed on plastic bag holding sponges and placed in folder located in a locked cabinet, 6) tDCS treatment document will be filled on daily notes.
Patients will receive a 20 minute anodal tDCS (1mA) to the left inferior frontal (Broca) area, concurrent with speech and language therapy by a trained speech language pathologist (SLP) over their stay (during at least 5 sessions). Since this is a feasibility study where the goal is to identify usability issues, workflow integration, and initial reactions. We will involve 5 SLP staff members who will use the device in around 30patients (6 patients/therapist).
This prospective implementation study will use a RE-AIM framework which has been previously used to implement medical devices in clinical settings. This framework includes 5 domains of assessment:
* REACH: The absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of individuals who are selected to participate in this study (eg, comparing participants to non-participants). These information will be collected in the hospital database. * EFFECTIVENESS/EFFICACY: The impact of an intervention on important individual outcomes, including potential negative effects; and variability across subgroups (generalizability or heterogeneity of effects). Effectiveness will be assessed using the Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WABr) and the Adverse Event Questionnaire (AEQ). The WABr is a part of the clinical routine and data will be extracted from the hospital database. The AEQ will be added in a log. * IMPLEMENTATION: At the setting level, implementation refers to the intervention agents' fidelity to the various elements of an intervention's key functions or components, including consistency of delivery as intended and the time and cost of the intervention. Importantly, it also includes adaptations made to interventions and implementation strategies. Consistency of implementation will be collected using a log. Barriers and facilitators will also be identified based on a tailored Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) questionnaire. Cost of intervention in terms of time and money will be assessed using the Nasa Taskload Index (NTI) and Cost Effective Analysis (CEA), respectively. * ADOPTION: The absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of intervention agents (staff who deliver the program) who are willing to initiate a program, and why. Data will be extracted post-study based on who participated. * MAINTENANCE: At the setting level, the extent to which a program or policy becomes institutionalized or part of the routine organizational practices and policies. This aspect will be assessed with the implementation in 2 settings (inpatient and outpatient) with follow-up interviews at 6 months.
The staff will be interviewed using the NTI and a tailored TDF questionnaire (30 minutes). All the data related to adverse events (AEQ) and consistency of delivery will be collected in a log that the therapist will use during each session. All other information will be extracted from the hospital database. All the data will be collected at 3 timepoints (every 3 patients; 3patients/therapist). An additional timepoint at baseline will be added only for the TDF questionnaire. Descriptive analyses (proportion, frequency, percentage) will be used to analyze the results to our survey. Qualitative analyses will also be used for addressing the open-ended questions of our survey.
Interventions
- Device transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
20 minute anodal tDCS (1mA) to the left inferior frontal (Broca) area, concurrent with speech and language therapy by a trained speech language pathologist (SLP) over their stay (during at least 5 sessions)
Primary outcome measures
- Nasa Taskload Index (NTI) [Time frame: 3 months, 6 months and 1 year (after the start of data collection, approximately)]
- Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) questionnaire [Time frame: at baseline, as well as 3 months, 6 months and 1 year (after the start of data collection, approximately)]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
- Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WABr) [Time frame: at patient's admission and discharge (around 3 weeks after admission)]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
- aphasia
Exclusion criteria
- not a patient at either inpatient and outpatient settings of Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Publications
- Williams EER, Sghirripa S, Rogasch NC, Hordacre B, Attrill S. Non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of post-stroke aphasia: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Aug;46(17):3802-3826. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2259299. Epub 2023 Oct 13. PMID 37828899
- Picano C, Quadrini A, Pisano F, Marangolo P. Adjunctive Approaches to Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Review on Efficacy and Safety. Brain Sci. 2021 Jan 2;11(1):41. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010041. PMID 33401678
- Breining BL, Sebastian R. Neuromodulation in post-stroke aphasia treatment. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2020 Jun;8(2):44-56. doi: 10.1007/s40141-020-00257-5. Epub 2020 Feb 22. PMID 33344066
- Khan A, Yuan K, Bao SC, Ti CHE, Tariq A, Anjum N, Tong RK. Can Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Facilitate Post-stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Feb 10;3:795737. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.795737. eCollection 2022. PMID 36188889
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07535788 · IRB#23721124