Menu
Recruiting NCT07520032

Effectiveness of Extra-corporeal Shockwave Diathermy in the Management of Upper Limb Function Patients With Stroke.

No phase Interventional Stroke

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: ESWT, Stretching, Mobility, Strengthening.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Stroke. Basic parameters: 18 years — 65 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United Arab Emirates
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Effectiveness of Extra-corporeal Shockwave Diathermy in the Management of Upper Limb Function Patients With Stroke: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Overview

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. A major complication of stroke is spasticity, marked by increased muscle tone and impaired movement. It affects majority stroke patients and complicates rehabilitation, affecting the upper limb function of survivors. While traditional treatments like oral medications and botulinum toxin injections offer some relief, they have notable limitations, causing the need for novel, non-invasive approaches. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), which uses acoustic waves for regeneration and neuromodulation, has shown promise in reducing spasticity with minimal side effects, though its precise mechanisms and ideal protocols need further study. Current evidence supports ESWT's efficacy and safety, often matching established treatments, but gaps remain regarding standardized application and long-term functional outcomes, highlighting the need for more robust research.

Detailed description

Stroke is one of the leading causes of mortality and long-term disability, with millions of new cases each year and a large proportion of survivors living with lasting impairments in movement and function. After a stroke, damage to the motor areas and descending pathways of the brain frequently leads to spasticity, a condition in which muscles become abnormally tight and resist passive stretch; this increase in muscle tone is velocity-dependent and often accompanied by weakness and loss of selective control. Spasticity develops in a substantial proportion of stroke survivors and is especially disabling when it involves the upper limb, where it interferes with reaching, grasping, releasing, and the performance of essential activities of daily living such as dressing, feeding, and personal care.

Upper limb involvement is particularly common because most strokes affect the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory, which supplies key regions of the motor cortex and internal capsule responsible for control of the face and arm more than the leg. As a result, many patients present with the characteristic pattern of flexor spasticity in the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and fingers, while the lower limb may show relatively better recovery or a different pattern of impairment. Recovery of upper limb function is also typically slower and less complete than that of the lower limb: walking often returns earlier, whereas fine hand and arm movements require more complex cortical processing and richer sensorimotor integration, which are more vulnerable to damage and harder to reorganize. This slower recovery reflects, in part, the lower effective neuroplasticity or more limited spontaneous re-organization in upper limb networks after stroke, meaning that more intensive, targeted, and often multimodal interventions are needed to restore arm and hand function.

Because of these factors, the upper limb frequently remains a limitation for independence even when a patient can walk, and persistent spasticity in the arm can further block functional gains by causing abnormal postures, contractures, and pain. Traditional approaches to spasticity management; such as oral antispastic medications and botulinum toxin injections can reduce muscle tone, but they often provide only temporary relief, may have systemic or local side effects, and do not always translate into meaningful functional improvements. These limitations have driven interest in innovative, non-invasive options that can modulate muscle tone and support neuroplasticity while fitting into comprehensive rehabilitation programs.

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is one such emerging modality as it delivers controlled acoustic waves to targeted muscles and soft tissues and is thought to act through a combination of mechanical, vascular, and neuromodulator mechanisms. Experimental and clinical studies suggest that ESWT may reduce spasticity by altering reflex excitability, influencing neuromuscular junction function, and promoting tissue regeneration and remodeling, with reported side effects generally mild and transient. Early and mid-term clinical evidence indicates that ESWT can safely decrease spasticity and, in some trials, achieve functional gains comparable to more established treatments, but the exact mechanisms, optimal parameters (energy, frequency, number of shocks, treatment sites, and session frequency), and long-term functional impact are not yet fully defined.

This study focuses on the upper limb spasticity as it is the region where disability is often greatest, recovery is slowest, and current options are imperfect. By targeting key flexor muscle groups of the affected upper limb with ESWT, the aim is to reduce pathological muscle overactivity and spasticity, thereby creating a more favorable biomechanical and neurophysiological environment for active training and functional use. The study plan hypothesizes that systematically applied ESWT, integrated with structured rehabilitation, can meaningfully improve upper limb function in stroke, addressing a critical unmet need in post-stroke care and contributing evidence toward standardized, parameter-based ESWT protocols.

Interventions

  • Other ESWT
    Target muscles: biceps brachii, flexor carpi radialis, pronator teres, wrist and finger flexors. Protocol: 2000 shocks per muscle per session, energy flux density 0.03 mJ/mm², frequency 8 Hz, pressure \~0.2 MPa (2 bars).(1)
  • Other Stretching
    Sustained stretches held for 10 seconds, 3-5 repetitions per muscle group
  • Other Mobility
    Active and passive range of motion (ROM) exercises, 10-15 reps
  • Other Strengthening
    Isometric/ Isotonic exercises for antagonist muscles, 3 sets of 10-15 reps
  • Other Functional training
    Task-oriented activities ADLs. Eg: grasping, reaching, manipulation, 20-30 minutes per session

Primary outcome measures

  • Upper limb function test [Time frame: Baseline, post intervention (6 week), 1 month followup (10 weeks)]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
  • Electrical activation of muscle [Time frame: Baseline, post intervention (6 week), 1 month followup (10 weeks)]
  • Muscles force generating capacity [Time frame: Baseline, post intervention (6 week), 1 month followup (10 weeks)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed as 1st stroke incidence 6 months back
  • Both male and female
  • Age 25 to 65 years
  • the ability to follow verbal instructions
  • Modified Ashworth Scale score 1-4

Exclusion criteria

  • Recurrent stroke.
  • Severe contractures or deformities of upper extremity.
  • Chronic pain affecting upper extremity function.
  • malignant tumor, pacemakers, infection

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United Arab Emirates · 1 center
  • Gulf Medical University — Ajman

Publications

  • Park M, Ko MH, Oh SW, Lee JY, Ham Y, Yi H, Choi Y, Ha D, Shin JH. Effects of virtual reality-based planar motion exercises on upper extremity function, range of motion, and health-related quality of life: a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized, controlled pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Oct 24;16(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0595-8. PMID 31651335
  • Duan H, Lian Y, Jing Y, Xing J, Li Z. Research progress in extracorporeal shock wave therapy for upper limb spasticity after stroke. Front Neurol. 2023 Feb 9;14:1121026. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1121026. eCollection 2023. PMID 36846123
  • Silverman JD, Balbinot G, Masani K, Zariffa J, Eng P. Validity and Reliability of Surface Electromyography Features in Lower Extremity Muscle Contraction in Healthy and Spinal Cord-Injured Participants. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2021 Fall;27(4):14-27. doi: 10.46292/sci20-00001. Epub 2021 Feb 8. PMID 34866885

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07520032 · IRB-COHS-FAC-57-Jan-2026

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗