Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07506304

Biological Potentials in Arthroscopic All-inside Semitendinosus Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

No phase Interventional Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Cruciate Ligament Rupture Cruciate Ligament Injury

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: ACL reconstruction.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Cruciate Ligament Rupture, Cruciate Ligament Injury. Basic parameters: 18 years — 50 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

A Double-blind, Randomized, Prospective, Single-center Study of Biological Potentials in Arthroscopic All-inside Semitendinosus Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Overview

A randomized, double-blind, prospective single-center clinical trial evaluating the effect of biological augmentation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The study compares standard all-inside semitendinosus ACL reconstruction versus biologically enhanced reconstruction incorporating muscle tissue preservation and autologous bone and fibrin augmentation. The primary aim is to assess whether biological augmentation improves graft healing, integration, and clinical outcomes.

Detailed description

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction outcomes depend on multiple factors including surgical technique, graft selection, fixation methods, and rehabilitation. Hamstring tendon autografts are commonly used due to favorable biomechanical properties and low donor-site morbidity. Traditionally, graft preparation involves complete removal of muscle tissue; however, emerging techniques such as the "candy stripe" method preserve residual muscle, which may provide a source of stem cells and enhance biological healing.

In addition, biological augmentation strategies-including the use of autologous bone graft and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF)-have been proposed to improve tendon-to-bone integration and accelerate ligamentization. These approaches aim to enhance graft incorporation, structural integrity, and overall functional recovery.

This study is a double-blind, randomized, prospective, single-center clinical trial including 70 patients with ACL rupture. Participants are randomly assigned into two groups (n=35 per group):

A control group undergoing standard all-inside ACL reconstruction. An intervention group undergoing biologically augmented ACL reconstruction.

All procedures are performed using an all-inside technique with semitendinosus tendon autografts. The biologically augmented group differs by:

Preservation of a thin layer of muscle tissue on the graft (candy stripe technique) Use of autologous cancellous bone collected during tunnel drilling Application of autologous fibrin glue (platelet-rich fibrin) combined with bone graft to enhance healing at graft-tunnel interfaces The primary objective is to evaluate whether biological augmentation improves graft healing and clinical outcomes compared to standard reconstruction.

Interventions

  • Procedure ACL reconstruction
    Participants will undergo arthroscopic all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an autologous semitendinosus graft. In the experimental intervention, a biologically augmented graft is used, including preservation of muscle tissue on the tendon (candy stripe technique) and application of autologous cancellous bone combined with platelet-rich fibrin at the graft-bone interface. In the control intervention, a standard tendon-only graft is used without biological augmentation. In b

Primary outcome measures

  • SNQ [Time frame: 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months postoperatively]
Secondary outcome measures (9)
  • Bone Tunnel Diameter [Time frame: 6 and 12 months postoperatively]
  • Knee Stability - Anterior Tibial Translation [Time frame: 12 months postoperatively]
  • KOOS - Pain Subscale [Time frame: Before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively]
  • KOOS - Symptoms Subscale [Time frame: Before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively]
  • KOOS - Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Subscale [Time frame: Before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively]
  • KOOS - Sports/Recreation Subscale [Time frame: Before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively]
  • KOOS - Quality of Life (QoL) Subscale [Time frame: Before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively]
  • KDC-SKF (International Knee Documentation Committee - Subjective Knee Form) [Time frame: Before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively]
  • Rerupture rate [Time frame: 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinically and radiologically confirmed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture.
  • Age between 18 and 50 years.
  • Intact posterior cruciate ligament and collateral ligaments.
  • Signed informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Patients meeting at least one indication for concomitant lateral tenodesis, including: age under 25 years, positive pivot-shift test, presence of Segond fracture, participation in sports with frequent changes of direction and rotational knee loads, or joint hypermobility (Beighton score ≥ 7).

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous ACL reconstruction of the same knee.
  • Inability to use a graft prepared by quadruple folding of the semitendinosus tendon.
  • Graft diameter < 7.5 mm.
  • MRI-confirmed unsuccessful meniscal healing after repair.
  • Acute joint infection or history of joint infection.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07506304 · 024/0719-3

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗