A Randomised Feasibility Study of CPAP in Large Airway Collapse
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: CPAP.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Large Airway Collapse, Asthma. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
Large airway collapse (LAC) is an increasingly recognised condition characterised by either bowing of the posterior membrane/trachealis muscle into the trachea or main bronchi (also known as excessive dynamic airway collapse, EDAC) or weakening of the tracheal cartilage (also known as tracheobronchomalacia, TBM).(1-3) LAC often co-exists with other chronic airway conditions, such as asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and is frequently misdiagnosed or overlooked as symptoms, such as shortness of breath, cough and wheeze overlap with other respiratory disease.(1) There is no standardised treatment pathway for patients diagnosed with LAC and current treatment options are limited to physiotherapy and/or hypertonic saline.(3) Exacerbations of LAC, defined as an acute worsening of respiratory symptoms, typically reduce health-related quality of life and increase healthcare utilisation.(4) Small studies and case series have suggested continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as a potential treatment for LAC to reduce exacerbations and improve quality of life.(5,6) It is hypothesised CPAP may work as a pneumatic splint helping to prevent dynamic collapse of the large airways. This may increase lung volumes due to increase in flow at functional residual capacity (FRC) and support higher elastic recoil and increased expiratory flow. Additionally, splinting of the large airways may cause stiffening of the large airways, resulting in less resistance and turbulence during expiration and may support sputum expectoration.(3) There is a need for high quality randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence to inform clinical recommendations in the United Kingdom (UK), as well as globally. Prior to this there is a need for further work exploring the feasibility of performing a large RCT and understanding the acceptability of CPAP as a future treatment for LAC. Aim To conduct a randomised feasibility study that will provide data to confirm if a larger randomised trial of CPAP in patients diagnosed with LAC is viable
Interventions
- Device CPAP
Nocturnal CPAP
Primary outcome measures
- Patient acceptability [Time frame: From Enrolment until 1 year]
- Recruitment and Retention [Time frame: At 18 months post enrolment]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
- Health Related Quality of Life Assessment [Time frame: At enrolment and 18 months]
- Healthcare Resource Utilisation [Time frame: At 18 months post enrolment]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Adult (≥18 years) at visit 1
- Able to provide informed consent
- Prior confirmation of LAC (diagnosed either radiographically or with bronchoscopy)
- Respiratory co-morbidities optimised
- ≥1 course of antibiotics and/or prednisolone for an exacerbation of chronic airway disease in the preceding 12 months before visit 1.
Exclusion criteria
- Contraindication to CPAP as per British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines
- Already using domiciliary CPAP (including privately purchased)
- Known obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) eligible for CPAP
- Suspected OSAS that is awaiting further investigation
- Pregnant or planning a pregnancy in the next 12 months
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Single group
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07504926 · 342137