Comparative Analysis of fast-and Slow-absorbable Poly(Lactose-co-glycolide) Sutures in Oral Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial.
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Fast absorbable sutures application, Standard absorbable sutures application.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Poly(Lactide-co-glycolide) Sutures, Suture Resorption, Third Molar Surgery. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Italy
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
This study aims to compare slow-resorbing and fast-resorbing sutures used after the surgical extraction of lower third molars. Sutures are routinely placed after wisdom tooth removal to promote hemostasis. Slow-resorbing and fast-resorbing sutures differ mainly in how long they remain in place, and fast-resorbing sutures often do not require removal. The study evaluates whether these two types of sutures differ in terms of microbiological contamination. Patient-reported inflammation, swelling, and postoperative discomfort will also be assessed. Each participant will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two suture types. Only routine clinical procedures are involved. Participation includes several standard visits: initial medical and dental history collection with oral and radiographic examination; the surgical extraction of the lower third molar; suture removal at 7 days. No additional invasive procedures are required. Participants will receive a daily diary to record pain levels and any pain medication taken during the first postoperative week. At the 7-day visit, wound healing will be evaluated and sutures will be removed, collected and anonymously analyzed by the University Microbiology Laboratory. This study seeks to provide useful information about the clinical performance and microbiological behavior of different types of resorbable sutures commonly used in oral surgery, with the goal of improving patient care and postoperative outcomes.
Detailed description
This study investigates the use of slow-resorbing versus fast-resorbing sutures following the surgical extraction of lower third molars. Sutures are routinely placed after wisdom tooth removal to promote hemostasis. Fast-resorbing sutures often do not require removal, while slow-resorbing sutures typically remain in place longer. The aim of the study is to compare the two types of sutures in terms of microbiological contamination. Patient-reported inflammation, swelling, and overall discomfort will also be assessed.
Each participant will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two suture types. Only routine oral surgery procedures are included, and no additional invasive or non-routine interventions are planned. Participation involves several standard visits: an initial screening visit with medical and dental history collection, oral examination, plaque and bleeding assessment, and radiographic review; the surgical extraction of the lower third molar; suture removal after 7 days.
On the day of the procedure, participants will receive a daily questionnaire to record pain levels and any analgesic medication taken during the first postoperative week. After surgery, standard antibiotic and anti-inflammatory therapy will be prescribed.
At the 7-day visit, sutures will be removed. The removed sutures will be collected and anonymously sent to the University Microbiology Laboratory (UniPD) for analysis and the participant's questionnaire will be retrieved.
Participants are expected to follow all postoperative instructions and attend all scheduled visits, which are essential both for proper clinical follow-up and for participation in the study. Any complications such as pain or bleeding must be promptly reported to the dentist. The overall goal of the study is to better understand the clinical and microbiological behavior of commonly used resorbable sutures in oral surgery, ultimately aiming to improve patient care and postoperative outcomes.
Interventions
- Device Fast absorbable sutures application
Fast absorbable sutures application on experimental group - Device Standard absorbable sutures application
Standard absorbable sutures application will be applied on control group
Primary outcome measures
- Microbiological evaluation of the sutures [Time frame: Evaluation will be conducted at the removal of the sutures (7 days after surgery)]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
- Clinician evaluation [Time frame: Clinical evaluation will be collected at the removal of the sutures (7 days after surgery)]
- Patient reported outcomes [Time frame: These parameters will be collected 7 days after surgery (at sutures removal)]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- non smoker patients
- clinical indication to third molar surgical removal
- patients who are able to express informed consent
Exclusion criteria
- smokers
- pregnant female
- subjects treated with medications that affect bone metabolism
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
Study locations
Italy · 1 center
- Hospital Dental Clinic — Padua
Publications
- Asher R, Chacartchi T, Tandlich M, Shapira L, Polak D. Microbial accumulation on different suture materials following oral surgery: a randomized controlled study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):559-565. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2476-0. Epub 2018 May 2. PMID 29717362
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07498361 · AOP3206