Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07496814

Comparison of the Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Total Abdominal Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Conditions in a Limited-resources Setting.

Observational Benign Gynecologic Conditions

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Benign Gynecologic Conditions. Basic parameters: 35 years — 65 years · Female.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

Minimally invasive hysterectomy (laparoscopic) is associated with shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, faster recovery, and improved early postoperative quality of life compared with open abdominal hysterectomy. However, in low-resource settings, barriers such as equipment availability, cost, and limited surgeon experience may influence outcomes.

Primary outcome measures

  • length of postoperative hospital stay [Time frame: beseline]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 35-65 years.
  • Indication for elective hysterectomy for benign disease.
  • Uterine size ≤ 16 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

  • Malignancy or suspicion of malignancy.
  • Prior extensive abdominal surgery with dense adhesions.
  • Morbid obesity, BMI more than 40
  • Severe cardiopulmonary disease.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Refusal participates in study

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07496814 · Lap VS abd Hysterectom

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗