Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07494071

Improving Family Communication in Older Adults: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

No phase Interventional Intergenerational Relations

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: ReFrame-R.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Intergenerational Relations. Basic parameters: from 60 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Pilot Evaluation of ReFrame-R: A Communication Training to Reframe Older Adults' Family Roles and Promote Active Aging

Overview

This study evaluates the effectiveness of "ReFrame-R," a communication training program designed to help older adults in Hong Kong navigate intergenerational challenges. By focusing on enhancing communication competence and clarifying role boundaries within parent-child relationships, the research seeks to determine if this specialized intervention can improve the mental well-being of both older and younger generations. The study asks whether participating in the "ReFrame-R" curriculum leads to measurable improvements in how families interact, hypothesizing that older adults in the training group will demonstrate significantly better communication quality and a stronger sense of meaning compared to those in a control group. This study also aims to evaluate the program's overall feasibility and acceptability.

Interventions

  • Behavioral ReFrame-R
    The ReFrame-R program is adapted from an established Motivational Interviewing (MI) protocol for laypersons (Kline et al., 2022). Grounded in Family Systems Theory, the curriculum specifically addresses over-functioning and under-functioning dynamics often found in older parent-adult child dyads and the cultural specific context of Hong Kong. Unlike general communication workshops, this program emphasizes role boundaries within parent-adult child relationship.

Primary outcome measures

  • Perceived communication competence [Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 (end of training), Week 6 (2 weeks follow-up)]
  • Meaning in life [Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 (end of training), Week 6 (2 weeks follow-up)]
Secondary outcome measures (7)
  • Self-efficacy [Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 (end of training), Week 6 (2 weeks follow-up)]
  • Well-being [Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 (end of training), Week 6 (2 weeks follow-up)]
  • Role boundaries [Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 (end of training), Week 6 (2 weeks follow-up)]
  • Family functioning [Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 (end of training), Week 6 (2 weeks follow-up)]
  • Training appropriateness [Time frame: Week 4 (end of training)]
  • Training acceptability [Time frame: Week 4 (end of training)]
  • Training feasibility [Time frame: Week 6 (2 week follow-up)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Cantonese-speaking older adults
  • have regular contact with adult children
  • can comprehend traditional Chinese

Exclusion criteria

  • known mental health diagnosis
  • mild or higher depressive symptoms (scored ≥5 on the Patient Health Questionnaire \[PHQ-9; Kroenke et al., 2001; Manea et al., 2015\])
  • communication difficulties

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Other

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Publications

  • Yu, Y. M. B., Lam, C., & Chan, C. S. (2024). All We Need is Love? Irreconcilable Political Incongruence in Families after the 2019 Social Unrest in Hong Kong. Political Psychology, 45, 643-665. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12941
  • Youth Research Centre. (2019). Strengthening Intergenerational Understanding (Society and Livelihood, Issue. The Hong Kong Federation of Youth Groups. https://yrc.hkfyg.org.hk/2019/12/09/yi048
  • Xiao, C. (2023). A comparative review of communication differences between Chinese and American families in child upbringing. Journal of Linguistics and Communication Studies, 2(3), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.56397/JLCS.2023.09.07
  • Wu, M. Y. (2023). The concept of guan in the Chinese parent-child relationship. In C. C. Yi (Ed.), The psychological well-being of East Asian youth (pp. 29-49). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2022.2081494
  • Whitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):1057-73. doi: 10.1177/0962280215588241. Epub 2015 Jun 19. PMID 26092476
  • Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3. PMID 28851459
  • Wang YL, Wang YH, Leung DKY, Wong SMY, Ng ZLY, Chan RCL, Chan OLH, Chan WC, Wong GHY, Lum TYS. Peer-supported mindfulness-based intervention for managing depressive symptoms in community-dwelling older adults: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Aug;155:107991. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107991. Epub 2025 Jun 20. PMID 40544956
  • Tsai FJ. The maintaining and improving effect of grandchild care provision on elders' mental health-Evidence from longitudinal study in Taiwan. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 May-Jun;64:59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Jan 16. PMID 26952378

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07494071 · EA260121 · 2501262488

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗