Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07484399

Comparing Effects of HIIT and MICT on Functional Mobility, Muscle Strength, and Quality of Life in Diabetic Patients

No phase Interventional Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Complication

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: High Intensity Interval Training, Moderate Intensity Continuous Training.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Complication. Basic parameters: 35 years — 65 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →

Official title

Comparing The Effects of High Intensity Interval Training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training on Functional Mobility, Muscle Strength, and Quality of Life in Diabetic Patients

Overview

To compare the effects of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT) on functional mobility, muscle strength, and quality of life in individuals with type-2-diabetes.

Detailed description

Comparing the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on functional mobility, muscle strength, and quality of life in diabetic patients is important due to the increasing burden of diabetes and its associated complications. Diabetes often leads to reduced physical function, muscle weakness, and poor quality of life. While both HIIT and MICT have demonstrated positive effects on health outcomes, it is not yet clear which exercise regimen offers superior benefits for improving mobility, strength, and overall well-being in diabetic individuals.

Diabetes often leads to reduced physical function, muscle weakness, and poor quality of life. While both HIIT and MICT have demonstrated positive effects on health outcomes, it is not yet clear which exercise regimen offers superior benefits for improving mobility, strength, and overall well-being in diabetic individuals. Understanding this can guide the development of more effective exercise protocols for diabetes management.

Interventions

  • Other High Intensity Interval Training
    3 session per week, 12 weeks sessions continued, each session had 4 sets of 4 minutes exercise with 3 min active rest inbetween routines. total 30 minutes per session, Sprinting and Jump squatting RPE 15-18
  • Other Moderate Intensity Continuous Training
    3 session per week, 12 weeks sessions continued, 40 minutes one single exercise regime with no intervals. Brisk Walking on Treadmill, RPE-11-13

Primary outcome measures

  • TUG timed up go test [Time frame: baseline pre exam, 6th week of intervention, and 12th week]
  • Hand Grip Strength Test [Time frame: baseline pre exam, 6th week of intervention, and 12th week]
  • Chair Stand Test [Time frame: baseline pre exam, 6th week of intervention, and 12th week]
  • The Borg 6-20 Scale [Time frame: baseline pre exam, 6th week of intervention, and 12th week]
  • WHOQOL-BREF Questionnaire [Time frame: baseline pre exam, 6th week of intervention, and 12th week]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

:• Adults aging form 35 to 65.

  • Both male and female diabetic patients.
  • Individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for at least five years.
  • Individuals able to participate in moderate to intense physical activity.

Exclusion criteria

  • • Individuals with significant orthopedic limitations.
  • Individuals with uncontrolled cardiovascular disease or musculoskeletal issues.
  • Individuals with incontinence issues during physical activity or inability to comply to study protocols

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Supportive care

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07484399 · REC/RCR & AHS/24/02110

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗