Skin Adhesive Plus Intra-cuticular Suture Versus Suture Alone for Cesarean Skin Closure
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Dermabond.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Surgical Site Infection (SSI). Basic parameters: from 18 years · Female.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Israel
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Intracuticular Suture Alone Compared to Intracuticular Suture and Skin Adhesive Material for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery : a Prospective Randomized Control Study
Overview
The goal of this randomized control trial is to compare two skin closure techniques after cesarean section. Both techniques are currently in wide use but no comparison between the two was reasserted yet. The two techniques are- First technique is intracuticular suture using monofilament suture, Second technique is intracuticular suture and biological adhesive material. The investigators' primary outcome is to explore the rate of skin scar complications to understand whether one technique has a lower complication rate then the other. The secondary outcomes is to check whether one technique is better then the other in terms of patients' satisfaction, convenience and scar healing and appearance. Patients at the age of 18 and above, undergoing elective cesarean section at the Hadassa medical center, can participate. participants will be randomly assigned to one of the groups- the firs or the second technique. Patients will be asked to fill out a questionnaire on POD 2 and attend a check-up appointment in-person with their surgeon 6-8 weeks post surgery. at the check-up the patient will be asked to fill out another questionnaire and undergo a scar appearance evaluation by the surgeon.
Interventions
- Other Dermabond
The intervention is the addition of skin adhesive biological material on top of an intracuticular suture in skin closure after cesarean section
Primary outcome measures
- Skin wound complecations [Time frame: From the surgery and up to 8 weeks post surgery]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
- Recovery and connivance of the patient at POD 2 [Time frame: From the day of the surgery up to 8 weeks post surgery]
- Patients' satisfaction from their recovery and scar healing process 6-8 weeks post surgery [Time frame: 6-8 weeks post surgery]
- Scar appearance after 6-8 weeks [Time frame: 6-8 weeks post surgery]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patients undergoing elective cesarean section at Hadassa medical center
- Patients undergoing elective cesarean section btween 37+0/7 and 41+6/7 weeks of gestation
Exclusion criteria
- Patients undergoing emergency cesarean section
- patients undergoing cesarean section before 37+0/7 weeks of gestation
- patients with a history of previous wound complications after previous Caesarean section
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Israel · 1 center
- Hadassah University Medical Center, Ein Karem Campus — Jerusalem
Publications
- Carriere ME, Mokkink LB, Tyack Z, Westerman MJ, Pijpe A, Pleat J, van de Kar AL, Brown J, de Vet HCW, van Zuijlen PPM. Development of the Patient Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) 3.0: a qualitative study. Qual Life Res. 2023 Feb;32(2):583-592. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03244-6. Epub 2022 Nov 10. PMID 36355319
- Baryza MJ, Baryza GA. The Vancouver Scar Scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995 Sep-Oct;16(5):535-8. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199509000-00013. PMID 8537427
- Feese CA, Johnson S, Jones E, Lambers DS. A randomized trial comparing metallic and absorbable staples for closure of a Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;209(6):556.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Aug 3. PMID 23921089
- Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Gottardi A, Cherubino M, Uccella S, Valdatta L. Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;203(1):36.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Apr 24. PMID 20417924
- Mackeen AD, Khalifeh A, Fleisher J, Vogell A, Han C, Sendecki J, Pettker C, Leiby BE, Baxter JK, Sfakianaki A, Berghella V. Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1169-1175. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000227. PMID 24807325
- de Graaf IM, Oude Rengerink K, Wiersma IC, Donker ME, Mol BW, Pajkrt E. Techniques for wound closure at caesarean section: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Nov;165(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.019. Epub 2012 Aug 19. PMID 22910336
- Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jun;6(6):e005671. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671. PMID 34130991
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07483411 · HMO041524