Menu
Recruiting NCT07462897

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a New Generation of Myopia Control Lens on the Progression of Myopia in Children Aged 6 to 14 Years

No phase Interventional Myopia Progression

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: MCL1, MCL2.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Myopia Progression. Basic parameters: 6 years — 14 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a New Generation of Myopia Control Lens, Producing a Higher Myopic Control Signal Than That Produced by a Previous Generation Lens, on the Progression of Myopia in Children Aged 6 to 14 Years

Overview

The goal of this clinical investigation is to learn how much a new generation of myopia control lens (MCL1 - Myopia Control Lens 1) is helpful in reducing myopia progression in children from 6 to 14 yo. The main questions it aims to answer is: How much this new generation of lens, called MCL1, slows down the growth of the eye? Researchers will compare MCL1 to a former generation of myopia control lens (i.e. MCL2) but with better vision quality. Participants will: * Wear MCL1 on right eye and MCL2 on left eye for 6 months and MCL2 on rigth eye and MCL1 on left eye for the next 6 months; * Visit the hospital at 6 and 12 months for tests; * Answer weekly questionnaires on compliance wearing glasses, quality of vision and out-of-school activities.

Detailed description

Myopia is a global public health issue that could affect nearly 5 billion people by 2050. It progresses rapidly in children, increasing the risk of severe ocular diseases. Several solutions exist to slow its progression, including ophthalmic lenses, which are effective and free of side effects. Essilor® Stellest® lenses, incorporating H.A.L.T. technology with aspherical lenslets, slow axial eye elongation with an efficacy comparable to high-dose atropine.

A new version of this product provides an enhanced myopia-control signal thanks to increased optical parameters of the lenslets. A recent study has demonstrated its superior effectiveness in Asian children aged 6 to 10. The present study aims to assess its performance in European children, compared with another myopia control lens, which delivers the same myopia-control signal as the original Stellest® lens but with better visual quality.

The study will take into account interindividual variability in efficacy, particularly with respect to age-a key factor in myopia progression (which is high between ages 6 and 8). Three age groups will be analyzed (6-8, 9-11, and 12-14 years). A secondary objective is to explore the impact of individual ocular parameters on lens effectiveness.

Interventions

  • Device MCL1
    Myopia Control Lens 1 (MCL 1) is an ophthalmic lens intended to slow down eye growth in children.
  • Device MCL2
    Myopia Control Lens 2 (MCL 2) is an ophthalmic lens intended to slow down eye growth in children.

Primary outcome measures

  • Change from baseline in axial length [Time frame: 6-month]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • Change from baseline in cycloplegic spherical equivalent [Time frame: 6-month]
  • Effect of optical parameters, assessed at baseline, on myopia control efficacy of MCL1 and MCL2 at 6-month. [Time frame: 6-month]
  • Effect of self-reported exposure time to natural light on myopia control efficacy of MCL1 and MCL2 at 6-month [Time frame: 6-month]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Refractive error in spherical equivalent (SE) ≤ -0.5 D and ≥ -4.5 D on each eye (autorefraction under cycloplegia)
  • Astigmatism ≤ 2.00 D for each eye
  • Anisometropia (difference in SE between the 2 eyes) ≤ 1.00 D
  • Corrected maximum distance visual acuity in each eye≥ 8/10 (equivalent to +0.1 LogMAR)
  • Written consent of the 2 holders of parental authority (or only one in the case of exclusive parental authority) and agreement of the participant

Exclusion criteria

  • Past or current use of any type of myopic control solution (braking lenses, atropine, orthokeratology, multifocal contact lenses, etc
  • Strabismus (in the test of masking near or far with the best correction)
  • Amblyopia
  • Any ocular or systemic condition known to affect refractive status (e.g., keratoconus, diabetes, Down syndrome, etc.)
  • Presence of trauma in at least one eye - Presence of inflammatory pathologies in at least one eye
  • History of intraocular surgery (cataracts, filtering surgery, intravitreal surgery) in at least one eye
  • Past or current use of growth hormones
  • Use of ocular or systemic drugs that, in the opinion of the investigator, may significantly affect pupil size, accommodation, or refractive status.
  • Wearing contact lenses
  • Allergy or intolerance to cycloplegic eye drops (cyclopentolate 0.5%)
  • Known allergy or intolerance to eyeglass frame materials
  • Children with specific visual disorders requiring personalized treatments other than conventional corrective lenses.
  • Intolerance to conventional optical corrections
  • Lack of cooperation in wearing corrective lenses

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Crossover
Masking
Triple blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

France · 1 center
  • Département d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild — Paris

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07462897 · WS10442 · 2025-A02213-46

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗