A Comparison of Remimazolam Besylate and Propofol Sedation in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopic Polypectomy
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Remimazolam besylate, Propofol.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Colonic Polyp, Sedation Complication. Basic parameters: 18 years — 60 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Croatia
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
The goal of this prospective, randomized, controlled study is to compare remimazolam besilat/sufentanyl and propofol/sufentanyl in patients during colonoscopic polypectomies procedures. Patients undergoing colonoscopic polypectomies in procedural sedation using remimazolam besylate/sufentanyl are circulatory and respiratory as or more stable when compared with propofol/sufentanyl sedation.
Detailed description
Following the approval for the research by the Ethics Committee (Clinical Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia), a total of ninety (90) patients will be included in the research. Forty five (45) patients will be assigned to the study group (SG) and forty five (45) patients to the control group (CG).
Research Goals:
Primary goals
1. Observe and compare circulatory and respiratory stability in patients undergoing procedural sedation with either remimazolam besylate or propofol during colonoscopic polypectomies 2. Define and compare the incidence of hypotension between the study grou and the control group. 3. Define and compare the incidence of respiratory depression between the study group and the control group.
Secondary goals
1. Define and compare the success of remimazolam besylate sedation compared with propofol. 2. Define and compare the time required to achieve adequate sedation between the two observed groups. 3. Define and compare the time to achieve full consciousness between the two observed groups. 4. Define and compare the time to complete recovery between the two groups.
Patients from both groups, upon arrival to the gastroenterology ward will have a peripheral venous line installed by puncturing one of the veins on the dorsum of the hand or forearm. The veins of choice include the rete venosum dorsale manus, vena cephalica and vena basilica, and an 18 G or 20 G intravenous cannula will be placed. After confirming the functionality of the venous line, the intravenous administration of Fifty will follow. The infusion rate will depend on the patient's BMI and circulatory status.
Study Group (SG):
A total of 45 patients are included in this group. After non-invasive monitoring, positioning the patient in the left lateral position and placing a nasal catheter with a continuous oxygen flow of 3 l/min, the patient will receive the intravenous opioid analgesic Sufentanyl 0.2 mcg/kg over a period of 30 seconds.
After 1 to 2 minutes the patient will receive remimazolam besylate intravenously in a dose of 5.0 mg over a period of 1 minute. After two minutes, a maintenance dose of 2.5 mg will be administered using the titration method over a period of 15 seconds until the desired sedation effect is achieved.The maximum intravenous dose of administered remimazolam besylate will be 33 mg.BIS monitoring and a modified MOAA/S (Modified Observers Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale) scale will be used to assess the depth of sedation. The first measurement of the depth of sedation will be initially following the complete administration of the sedative remimazolam besylate and will serve as the initial/starting point. Afterwards, a measurement of the MOAA/S scale will be performed every 30 seconds for a total of 3 minutes. The most desirable level of sedation for the planned procedure is defined as a MOAA/S measurement of \<3.
Control group (CG)
A total of 45 patients will be included in this group.
Firstly, non-invasive monitoring will be applied to the patient, then they will be placed in the left lateral position and through a nasal catheter a continuous oxygen flow of 3l/min will be administered. The patient will be given intravenous opioid analgesia Sufentanyl 0.2 mg/kg. within 30 seconds. After approximately 1-2 minutes the patient will receive the titrated anesthetic propofol intravenously at a dose of 1.5 to 2.5 mg/kg, (20.0 to 30.0 mg propofol every 10 seconds). In elderly patients and patients with ASA grade III, the total dose of propofol will be at least 1 mg/kg with an administration rate of 10.0 to 20.0 mg every 10 seconds.
Sedation will be maintained using propofol in a continuous intravenous infusion. The maintenance dose given will be 0.5 to 1.0 mg propofol/kg/hour.
BIS monitoring and a modified MOAA/S (Modified Observers Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale) scale will be used to assess the depth of sedation. The first measurement of the MOAA/S score will be conducted after the total intravenous propofol dose was administered and this first measurement will be considered the starting/zero measurement. MOAA/S scale point will be measured every 30 seconds for a total of 3 minutes. A measurement of \<3 points will be considered the most desirable level of sedation for the planned procedure.
In both study groups the following parameters will continuously be measured:
1. Pulse oxymetry (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), EKG, heart rate (HR) and rhythm, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure. 2. Circulatory parameters including systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure will be measured:
Primary measurement:
Upon patients' arrival to the pre-op room (first measurement) and 5 minutes before proceeding to the operating theater.
During the procedure:
Before administering the sedative remimazolam besylate or propofol and at 3, 5, 10, and 15 minutes. (every 5 minutes during the procedure) until the patient is consciousness, followed by the first of five sets of MOAAS/S measurements upon completion of the procedure or when the last dose of medication is given.
Frequency of hypotension in both groups of patients and comparing the results between the SG and CG.
Hypotension during the procedure using sedation or propofol is defined as:
a decrease in systolic systemic pressure of 20% or more compared with the first measurement before the administration of remimazolam besylata or propofol.
A mean arterial pressure of ≤60 mmHg during while the patient is under sedation.
4\. Sinus bradycardia is defined as a decreased cardiac rate. 5. The frequency of respiratory depression compared between the two groups, SG and CG.
Respiratory depression during sedation is defined as:
Respiratory rate of \<8 breaths per minute and/or a peripheral blood oxygen percentage of (SpO2) \<90.
6\. BIS monitoring. 7. The success of procedural sedation using remimazolam besylate and sedation using propofol:
Will be shown as the percentage of successfully sedated patients defined as:
The completion of endoscopic polypectomy, without the need for rapid/fast acting emergency sedation or a maximum number of 5 additional doses given withing 15 minutes of the first dose to maintain adequate sedation.
8\. The time to achieve adequate sedation is defined as the time from administering the first dose of medication until achieving \<3 points on the MOAA/S scale and/ora BIS.
9\. The time to achieve full consciousness is defined as the time since the administration of the last dose of medication until the patient is fully aware, or until the patients has 5 points on the MOAA/S scale.
10\. The time needed for the patient to fully recover after the procedure in both groups is defined by the criteria for patient dismissal using the - Modified Aldrete score scale.
The total volume of the given crystalloid solution (Plasma-lyte) will be measured in both groups.
Interventions
- Drug Remimazolam besylate
The patient will receive the intravenous opioid analgesic sufentanyl 0.2 mcg/kg over a period of 30 seconds. After 1 to 2 minutes the patient will receive remimazolam besylate intravenously in a dose of 5.0 mg over a period of 1 minute. After two minutes, a maintenance dose of 2.5 mg will be administered using the titration method over a period of 15 seconds until the desired sedation effect is achieved.The maximum intravenous dose of administered remimazolam besylate will be 33 mg.BIS monitorin - Drug Propofol
The patient will be given intravenous opiod analgesia sufentanyl 0,2 mg/kg.within 30 seconds. After approximately 1-2 minutes the patient will receive the titrated anestetic propofol intravenously at a dose of 1,5 to 2,5 mg/kg (20,0 mg. propofol evry 10 seconds). In elderly patients and patients with ASA grade III, the total dose of propofol will be least 1 mg/kg with an administration rate of 10 every 10 seconds.
Primary outcome measures
- Hemodynamic Stability - Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) [Time frame: from enrollment up to 2 hours after the procedure; approximately 2-4 hours per participant.]
- Hemodynamic Stability - Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure [Time frame: from enrollment up to 2 hours after the procedure; approximately 2-4 hours per participant.]
- Hemodynamic Stability - Heart Rate [Time frame: from enrollment up to 2 hours after the procedure; approximately 2-4 hours per participant.]
- Incidence of Hypotension [Time frame: from enrollment up to 2 hours after the procedure; approximately 2-4 hours per participant.]
- Incidence of Bradycardia [Time frame: from enrollment up to 2 hours after the procedure; approximately 2-4 hours per participant.]
- Respiratory Stability - Oxygen Saturation (SpO₂) [Time frame: from enrollment up to 2 hours after the procedure; approximately 2-4 hours per participant.]
- Incidence of Respiratory Depression [Time frame: from enrollment up to 2 hours after the procedure; approximately 2-4 hours per participant.]
Secondary outcome measures (11)
- Procedural Sedation Success Rate [Time frame: During the endoscopic procedure (estimated 30-50 minutes]
- Time to Adequate Sedation Level [Time frame: From first drug administration until adequate sedation achieved (estimated 1-5 minutes)]
- Time to Full Alertness [Time frame: From last drug administration until full alertness (estimated 10-20 minutes post-procedure)]
- Time to Recovery Room Discharge Readiness [Time frame: From last drug administration until meeting discharge criteria (estimated 15-30 minutes post-procedure)]
- Depth of Sedation - BIS Values [Time frame: From baseline through procedure completion until full alertness (estimated 30-60 minutes)]
- Depth of Sedation - MOAA/S Scores [Time frame: Baseline, immediately after drug administration, then every 30 seconds for 3 minutes, then as clinically indicated during procedure]
- Total Drug Dosage [Time frame: During procedure (estimated 30-50 minutes)]
- Procedure and sedation duration [Time frame: From first drug administration to full alertness (estimated 30-60 minutes) From procedure start to procedure completion (estimated 30-50 minutes)]
- Total Crystalloid Infusion Volume [Time frame: During procedure and recovery (estimated 30-90 minutes)]
- Incidence of Post-Procedure Pain, nausea and vomiting [Time frame: ost-procedure assessment before recovery room discharge (estimated 30-60 minutes after last drug dose)]
- Satisfaction Score [Time frame: Post-procedure before recovery room discharge]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patients both male and female
- ages 18 to 60 years,
- with one or more colonic polyps confirmed by colonoscopy and scheduled for a colonoscopy and polypectomy
- The duration of the colonoscopy ranges from 30 to 50 minutes.
- ASA status (American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status) I-III.
- BMI (Body mass index) 18.5-29.9 kg/m2.
- Only patients who signed an informed consent waiver and consented to participate in the research study.
Exclusion criteria
- Patients aged >60 years
- ASA status IV-V,
- BMI >29.9 kg/m2,
- a high risk of vomiting, regurgitation and/or aspiration of gastric contents.
- Patients with:
- uncontrolled hypertension (systolic pressure >160 mmHg),
- heart disease (cardiomyopathy, cardiac-rhythm disorder, left ventricular ejection fraction <45%, stenosis or heart valve insufficiency and coronary heart disease)
- lung disease (pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma and pulmonary tumors),
- kidney diseases (kidney failure, GF 30/59 ml/min/1.73m2),
- liver diseases,
- coagulation disorders
- lymphatic tissue diseases
- extended malignant disease.
- History of allergy on nutritional allergens including soy bean, benzodiazepines, propofol or opioids.
- Patients who currently use analgesic medications or other psycho-pharmaceuticals.
- History of illicit drug use.
- Children, pregnant and nursing women.
- Alcohol dependency.
- Patients involved in other clinical research studies,
- patients who refused to take part in the research or have not signed the written informed consent form.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Croatia · 1 center
- UHC Zagreb — Zagreb
Publications
- Zhu X, Wang H, Yuan S, Li Y, Jia Y, Zhang Z, Yan F, Wang Z. Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam in Endoscopic Sedation-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 26;8:655042. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.655042. eCollection 2021. PMID 34381792
- Qiu Y, Gu W, Zhao M, Zhang Y, Wu J. The hemodynamic stability of remimazolam compared with propofol in patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection: A randomized trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 8;9:938940. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.938940. eCollection 2022. PMID 36004376
- Guo J, Qian Y, Zhang X, Han S, Shi Q, Xu J. Remimazolam tosilate compared with propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients: a prospective, randomized and controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jun 10;22(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01713-6. PMID 35689208
- Xin Y, Chu T, Wang J, Xu A. Sedative effect of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in colonoscopic polypectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Aug 16;22(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01805-3. PMID 35974309
- Chen SH, Yuan TM, Zhang J, Bai H, Tian M, Pan CX, Bao HG, Jin XJ, Ji FH, Zhong TD, Wang Q, Lv JR, Wang S, Li YJ, Yu YH, Luo AL, Li XK, Min S, Li L, Zou XH, Huang YG. Remimazolam tosilate in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority, phase III trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Feb;36(2):474-481. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15188. Epub 2020 Jul 24. PMID 32677707
- Dossa F, Megetto O, Yakubu M, Zhang DDQ, Baxter NN. Sedation practices for routine gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review of recommendations. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01561-z. PMID 33413147
- Sahinovic MM, Struys MMRF, Absalom AR. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Propofol. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Dec;57(12):1539-1558. doi: 10.1007/s40262-018-0672-3. PMID 30019172
- Borkett KM, Riff DS, Schwartz HI, Winkle PJ, Pambianco DJ, Lees JP, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K. A Phase IIa, randomized, double-blind study of remimazolam (CNS 7056) versus midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2015 Apr;120(4):771-80. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000548. PMID 25502841
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07456111 · LOC-100018379