Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07450365

Evaluation of Long-term Efficacy of 4 to 6-month Course Antiviral Therapy for Neurodevelopmental Impairments Caused by Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection

Phase IV Interventional Congenital CMV Infection

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Intravenous ganciclovir (6 mg/kg, twice daily) or oral valganciclovir (16 mg/kg, twice daily) was administered for a treatment course of 4 months., Patients received a 6-month course of anti-CMV therapy. The treatment regimen consisted of either intravenous ganciclovir (6 mg/kg, twice daily) or oral valganciclovir (16 mg/kg, twice daily)..
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Congenital CMV Infection. Basic parameters: 1 Day — 30 Days · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Evaluation of Long-term Efficacy of 4 to 6-month Course Antiviral Therapy for Neurodevelopmental Impairments Caused by Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial

Overview

Title: Evaluation of Long-term Efficacy of 4-month versus 6-month Course Antiviral Therapy for Neurodevelopmental Impairment Caused by Congenital CMV Infection: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Non-inferiority Clinical Study 1\. Background and Rationale:Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is a leading cause of childhood neurodevelopmental disability and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). International guidelines, based on evidence from high-income countries, recommend a 6-month antiviral course for symptomatic infection. However, clinical practice in China lags significantly, still adhering to a 3-4 week regimen due to a lack of high-quality domestic evidence. Preliminary data suggest a 4-month course may be non-inferior to the 6-month standard by potentially aligning with the transition from productive to latent infection around 4 months of age. This study aims to address this critical evidence gap.2. Study Objectives:Primary: To evaluate the impact of intermediate (4-month) versus long (6-month) course antiviral therapy on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants with moderate-to-severe cCMV infection, and to establish a novel diagnostic and therapeutic framework.Secondary: To identify high-risk factors associated with adverse long-term outcomes.3. Study Design and Methods:This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial.Participants: Newborns (≤30 days old) diagnosed with moderate-to-severe cCMV infection. Key exclusion criteria include gestational age \<32 weeks, birth weight \<1.8 kg, and coexisting genetic/metabolic diseases.Randomization \& Intervention: Eligible subjects will be block-randomized 1:1 via a computer-generated sequence.Experimental Group: Receives 4 months of antiviral therapy.Control Group: Receives 6 months of antiviral therapy (current international standard).Both groups receive either intravenous ganciclovir (6 mg/kg, twice daily) or oral valganciclovir (16 mg/kg, twice daily).Sample Size: A total of 150 subjects will be enrolled (60 from the lead center), anticipating 126 evaluable cases at study completion (2 years of age) to demonstrate non-inferiority with a margin (Δ) of 20%, 80% power, and a one-sided alpha of 0.025.4. Evaluation and Endpoints:Primary Outcome: Composite poor neurodevelopmental outcome at 12 months of age, defined as (1) death, or (2) moderate/severe impairment, including cerebral palsy, epilepsy, moderate-to-severe SNHL (\>40 dB threshold and/or requiring cochlear implantation), visual impairment, or a score \<-2 SD on standardized developmental scales (Griffiths, BSID-II, or Bayley-III).Secondary Outcomes: Include mild neurodevelopmental impairment at 12 months, and poor/mild neurodevelopmental outcomes at 24 months.Assessments: Scheduled follow-ups include clinical, laboratory (hepatic/renal function, CMV DNA load), and instrumental evaluations (neuroimaging, audiology, ophthalmology) during treatment and at 6, 12, and 24 months of age.5. Data Management and Ethics:Data will be managed using a multicenter Electronic Data Capture (EDC) system with double data entry. The study protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants' guardians. The study is scheduled from January 2026 to December 2028.This study will provide crucial high-level evidence to inform optimal antiviral therapy duration for cCMV infection in China, with the goal of improving long-term child health outcomes and reducing disease burden.

Detailed description

Study Identification

Brief Title: 4-month vs. 6-month Antiviral Therapy for Congenital CMV Infection: A Non-inferiority Trial (CMV-DURATION).

Official Title: Evaluation of Long-term Efficacy of 4-month versus 6-month Course Antiviral Therapy for Neurodevelopmental Impairment Caused by Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Non-inferiority Clinical Study.

Protocol Version: 1.1, January 15, 2026.

2\. Background and Rationale Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is the most common infectious cause of neurodevelopmental impairment and non-genetic sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in children worldwide. Approximately 10-15% of symptomatic infants develop long-term neurological sequelae.

The scientific premise for this study is based on two key observations:

Landmark studies (e.g., Kimberlin et al.) indicate that the long-term neurodevelopmental benefit of a 6-month course over a 6-week course may be mediated by sustained viral suppression, with viral load differences persisting until around 4 months of age.

Preliminary data from our prior multicenter study suggest that a 4-month antiviral course is significantly superior to a 6-week course in improving long-term brain function.

We hypothesize that as the neonatal immune system matures, active viral replication may transition to a latent state around 4 months of age. Therefore, a 4-month treatment course may be non-inferior to the 6-month standard course, potentially optimizing therapy by reducing duration-related risks (e.g., drug toxicity, cost, potential for resistance) while maintaining efficacy.

3\. Objectives

Primary Objective: To evaluate the non-inferiority of a 4-month course versus a 6-month course of antiviral therapy on the composite poor neurodevelopmental outcome at 12 months of age in infants with moderate-to-severe symptomatic cCMV infection.

Secondary Objectives:

To compare the long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes (both poor and mild impairment) between the two treatment groups at 12 and 24 months of age.

To identify high-risk factors associated with adverse long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes.

To compare safety profiles (e.g., hematological, hepatic, renal toxicity) between the 4-month and 6-month treatment regimens.

4\. Study Design

Trial Design: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, active-controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial.

Randomization: Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the Experimental Group (4-month course) or the Active Control Group (6-month course). Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated block randomization sequence.

Blinding: This is an open-label study. Outcome assessors for key neurodevelopmental and audiological evaluations are encouraged to be blinded to treatment allocation where feasible.

Sample Size: A total of 150 subjects will be enrolled to yield 126 evaluable subjects at the final follow-up (63 per group). This calculation is based on an anticipated composite poor outcome rate of 20% at 12 months, a non-inferiority margin (Δ) of 20%, a one-sided alpha of 0.025, and 80% power, accounting for a 16% dropout rate.

5\. Participants

Inclusion Criteria:

Confirmed congenital CMV infection (CMV DNA detected in urine, blood, or serum within 21 days after birth).

Clinical disease classified as moderate or severe symptomatic cCMV infection (defined by involvement of multiple systems, including at least one neurologic finding, or two or more central nervous system findings such as microcephaly, imaging abnormalities, SNHL, chorioretinitis, or positive CMV DNA in CSF).

Age at enrollment ≤ 30 days. Written informed consent obtained from the parent(s) or legal guardian(s).

Exclusion Criteria:

Gestational age \< 32 weeks. Birth weight \< 1.8 kg. Absence of informed consent. Confirmed genetic mutations associated with hearing loss (e.g., GJB2). Coexisting major genetic or metabolic diseases known to affect neurodevelopment.

Occurrence of other intracranial infections during the neonatal period. Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the infant unsuitable for the study or preclude evaluation.

6\. Interventions

Medications: All participants will receive standard antiviral therapy.

Intravenous Ganciclovir: 6 mg/kg per dose, administered twice daily (every 12 hours) via intravenous infusion.

Oral Valganciclovir: 16 mg/kg per dose, administered twice daily (every 12 hours).

The choice between intravenous or oral therapy will be at the treating physician's discretion based on the infant's clinical status and ability to tolerate oral medication.

Group Assignments:

Experimental Group (4-month course): Receives antiviral therapy for a total duration of 4 months (approximately 16 weeks).

Active Control Group (6-month course): Receives antiviral therapy for a total duration of 6 months (approximately 24 weeks), consistent with current international standard-of-care.

7\. Study Procedures and Assessments

Screening \& Baseline (≤21 days): Diagnosis confirmation, baseline lab tests (hematology, hepatic/renal function, blood/urine CMV DNA load), and comprehensive assessments (cranial imaging, brainstem auditory evoked potential, ophthalmologic exam, abdominal ultrasound).

Treatment Phase: Clinical \& Safety Monitoring: Follow-up every 2 weeks for infants ≤3 months old, and monthly for infants \>3 months old until the end of their assigned therapy. Assessments include physical exam, safety labs (complete blood count with differential, hepatic/renal function), and CMV DNA load monitoring.

Post-Treatment Follow-up: Scheduled Visits: All participants will be evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 months of age (chronological).

Interventions

  • Drug Intravenous ganciclovir (6 mg/kg, twice daily) or oral valganciclovir (16 mg/kg, twice daily) was administered for a treatment course of 4 months.
    in Intervention group,Intravenous ganciclovir (6 mg/kg, twice daily) or oral valganciclovir (16 mg/kg, twice daily) was administered for a treatment course of 4 months.
  • Drug Patients received a 6-month course of anti-CMV therapy. The treatment regimen consisted of either intravenous ganciclovir (6 mg/kg, twice daily) or oral valganciclovir (16 mg/kg, twice daily).
    Patients received a 6-month course of anti-CMV therapy. The treatment regimen consisted of either intravenous ganciclovir (6 mg/kg, twice daily) or oral valganciclovir (16 mg/kg, twice daily).

Primary outcome measures

  • Death [Time frame: at 12 Months]
  • Cerebral Palsy (GMFCS level ≥ II) [Time frame: at 12 months of age]
  • Behavioral Disorders Requiring Intervention [Time frame: at 12 months of age]
  • Epilepsy [Time frame: at 12 months of age]
  • Moderate-to-Severe Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SNHL) [Time frame: at 12 months of age]
  • Visual Impairment [Time frame: at 12 months of age]
  • Significant Developmental Delay [Time frame: at 12 months of age]
Secondary outcome measures (11)
  • Mild Neurodevelopmental Impairment [Time frame: at 12 months of age]
  • Composite Poor Neurodevelopmental Outcome [Time frame: at 24 months of age]
  • Mild Neurodevelopmental Impairment at 24 Months [Time frame: at 24 months of age]
  • Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) [Time frame: from start of treatment through 24 months of age]
  • Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [Time frame: from start of treatment through 24 months of age]
  • Incidence of Hematological Toxicity - Neutropenia [Time frame: from start of treatment through 24 months of age]
  • Incidence of Hematological Toxicity - Thrombocytopenia [Time frame: from start of treatment through 24 months of age]
  • Incidence of Hepatic Dysfunction [Time frame: from start of treatment through 24 months of age]
  • Incidence of Renal Dysfunction [Time frame: from start of treatment through 24 months of age]
  • Time to Undetectable CMV DNA in Blood [Time frame: from start of treatment through 24 months of age]
  • Time to Undetectable CMV DNA in Urine [Time frame: from start of treatment through 24 months of age]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed congenital CMV infection (CMV DNA detected in urine, blood, or serum within 21 days after birth).
  • Clinical disease classified as moderate or severe symptomatic cCMV infection (defined by involvement of multiple systems, including at least one neurologic finding, or two or more central nervous system findings such as microcephaly, imaging abnormalities, SNHL, chorioretinitis, or positive CMV DNA in CSF).
  • Age at enrollment ≤ 30 days.
  • Written informed consent obtained from the parent(s) or legal guardian(s).

Exclusion criteria

  • Gestational age < 32 weeks.
  • Birth weight < 1.8 kg.
  • Absence of informed consent.
  • Confirmed genetic mutations associated with hearing loss (e.g., GJB2).
  • Coexisting major genetic or metabolic diseases known to affect neurodevelopment.
  • Occurrence of other intracranial infections during the neonatal period.
  • Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the infant unsuitable for the study or preclude evaluation.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07450365 · 2025-IRB-0548-Y-01

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗