Menu
Recruiting NCT07442188

Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Quadro-iliac Plane Block and Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks in Inguinal Hernia Surgery

No phase Interventional Peripheral Nerve Block Pain Management Hernia, Inguinal

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: TAPB, QIPB.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Peripheral Nerve Block, Pain Management, Hernia, Inguinal. Basic parameters: 18 years — 65 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Turkey (Türkiye)
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. Despite being classified as a minor surgical intervention, moderate to severe postoperative pain is reported in approximately 60% of patients. In a subset of these patients, acute postoperative pain may persist and evolve into chronic post-surgical inguinal pain, significantly affecting quality of life. In recent years, beyond the use of systemic intravenous analgesics, ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks have been increasingly incorporated into multimodal analgesia protocols with the aim of reducing postoperative opioid consumption and improving pain control. However, the current literature does not provide definitive evidence regarding the superiority of one block technique over another in this surgical population. The primary objective of the present study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of the Quadro-iliac Plane Block (QIPB) and the transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.

Interventions

  • Procedure TAPB
    Patients will undergo TAPB procedure using 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance.
  • Procedure QIPB
    Patients will undergo QIPB procedure using 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance.

Primary outcome measures

  • Pain Score [Time frame: Up to 24 hours]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • Patient Satisfaction [Time frame: 24th hour]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged between 18 and 65 years
  • Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I-III.
  • Patients with a body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 30 kg/m².
  • Patients scheduled to undergo unilateral inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia in the operating room.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients younger than 18 years or older than 65 years.
  • Patients with an ASA physical status classification of IV or higher.
  • Patients with advanced comorbidities.
  • Patients with a history of bleeding diathesis.
  • Patients with infection at the site of the planned procedure.
  • Patients with a BMI below 18 kg/m² or above 30 kg/m².

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Turkey (Türkiye) · 1 center
  • Ankara Etlik City Hospital — Ankara

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07442188 · AEŞH-EK-2026-017

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗