Promoting Environmental Responsibility Toward Climate Change
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Environmental Responsibility Program, Brochure and standard curriculum.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Climate Change, Health Behavior, Environmental Awareness and Sensitivity. Basic parameters: 11 years — 13 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Promoting Environmental Responsibility Toward Climate Change Among Middle School Students: A Randomized Controlled Study Based on the An Integrated Planned Behavior Theory and Value-Belief-Norm Theory
Overview
This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a climate change environmental responsibility development program for middle school students on their environmental responsibility, environmental attitudes, and environmental behaviors. The program to be implemented in the study is based on the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Value-Belief-Norm Theory, is compatible with the new ecological paradigm, and its main focus is to instill environmental responsibility towards climate change.
Detailed description
Climate change is defined as a global public health problem and poses a significant threat. The accelerating rate of climate change negatively impacts human health, animal ecosystems, agricultural diversity, and environmental conditions. The world's climate system has undergone a significant increase in the last century, resulting in various global changes. These include warming of landmasses, rising ocean and sea levels worldwide, thawing of permafrost, earlier onset of plant growth in spring, and changes in the geographical distribution of some plants, animals, and insects. As a result of the changing climate system, extreme weather events such as storms, devastating floods, severe waves, heat waves, and uncontrollable wildfires have begun to increase globally. Climate change also affects human life and health in various ways. It is predicted that malnutrition, malaria, diarrhea, and heat-related deaths will increase due to climate change. Furthermore, it threatens fundamental elements of good health such as clean air, safe drinking water, nutritious food supply, and safe shelter, hindering decades of progress in global health. Individual, societal, and institutional efforts are being undertaken to mitigate the negative impacts of climate change. When the scope of the studies is examined, there are different examples aimed at raising individual awareness, encouraging community participation, and developing positive environmental behaviors. In the field of public health, the focus is on understanding the effects of climate change on human health and evaluating the effectiveness of interventions that focus on individual behavioral change in combating climate change. This includes nature-based education programs, documentary screenings, problem-solving-based or STEM-based interactive education programs.
In the literature, the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Value-Belief-Norm Theory are frequently used to explain behavioral change and mitigate the effects of climate change. Furthermore, when examining models that integrate the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Value-Belief-Norm Theory to explain intentions towards behavior, the importance of the interaction between values, beliefs, norms, attitudes, and intentions is emphasized. The New Ecological Paradigm approach has been found to be important in studies conducted on the Value-Belief-Norm Theory. Although the Theory of Planned Behavior, the Value-Belief-Norm Theory, and the New Ecological Paradigm are frequently used in studies on climate change, these studies are observational and require intervention studies to explain causal relationships. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions based on the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Value-Belief-Norm Theory in a program to develop environmental responsibility among middle school students using the new ecological paradigm approach. Combining one paradigm and two theories can offer a framework for structured environmentally focused education.
Interventions
- Behavioral Environmental Responsibility Program
The research initiative is to develop an environmental responsibility program for middle school students, prepared in accordance with the Theory of Planned Behavior, the Value-Belief-Norm Theory, and the New Ecological Paradigm, regarding climate change. The program to be implemented in the study and its main focus is to instill environmental responsibility towards climate change. This program includes intervention activities prepared based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (Perceived Attitude, - Behavioral Brochure and standard curriculum
A brochure containing messages and guidance on climate change, its effects and environmentally friendly behaviour will be distributed to students in the control group. In addition, students are studying units and topics related to the environment in the school curriculum. The experimental group also has this curriculum.
Primary outcome measures
- Environmental Responsibility Scale [Time frame: Frame: T0 (Pre-test) T1 (15 days after the end of the procedure) T2 (3 months after the end of the procedure)]
- Environmental Responsibility Behavior Scale [Time frame: T0 (Pre-test) T1 (15 days after the end of the procedure) T2 (3 months after the end of the procedure)]]
- Middle Childhood Environmental Attitudes Scale [Time frame: T0 (Pre-test) T1 (15 days after the end of the procedure) T2 (3 months after the end of the procedure)]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- being enrolled in the schools where the project is implemented,
- being 11-13 years old,
- obtaining parental permission and student consent to participate in the study,
- volunteering to participate in group work
Exclusion criteria
- the students have a barrier to attending the sessions planned within the scope of the study (allergies such as dust, soil or plant allergies, parental involvement barrier),
- the parent is unwilling to receive email and text message communications as part of the study,
- the teacher is unwilling to be part of the program
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07429513 · 108/6