Integrated Multimodal Assessment to Optimize Diagnosis and Surgical Selection in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Basic parameters: 60 years — 85 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Italy
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Integrated Multimodal Approach for Diagnostic Optimization and Surgical Candidate Selection in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: The Role of CSF Biomarkers, Cognitive-Motor Assessment, and Neuroimaging
Overview
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurological condition that can cause walking difficulties, cognitive impairment, and urinary incontinence. Although iNPH can be treated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt surgery, diagnosis is often challenging because its symptoms and brain imaging findings may overlap with those of other neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease or vascular parkinsonism. As a result, some patients may experience delayed diagnosis or may not be referred for potentially beneficial surgical treatment. This observational study aims to evaluate whether combining different types of clinical information can improve the diagnosis of iNPH and help identify patients who are more likely to benefit from surgery. The study integrates cognitive testing, motor performance assessment, CSF biomarker analysis, and brain magnetic resonance imaging. Patients aged over 60 years with suspected iNPH who are evaluated within a standardized diagnostic care pathway will be included. Cognitive and motor performance will be assessed before and after a cerebrospinal fluid tap test, which is part of routine clinical practice. Results will be compared between patients who receive a confirmed diagnosis of iNPH and undergo CSF shunt surgery and patients who receive an alternative diagnosis and do not undergo surgical treatment. The results of this study may help improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce false-negative test results, and support better clinical decision-making in patients with suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.
Detailed description
This is an observational, non-interventional cohort study designed to assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of a multimodal approach in patients with suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH).
The study includes patients aged over 60 years who are referred to a standardized diagnostic, therapeutic, and care pathway for suspected iNPH at a tertiary referral center. All data are collected as part of routine clinical practice after informed consent.
Clinical data collection includes demographic and medical information, standardized neuropsychological assessments, motor performance tests, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, and brain magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive and motor assessments are performed before and after the CSF tap test, which is routinely used to support diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making in iNPH.
The exposed cohort consists of patients with confirmed iNPH who undergo CSF shunt surgery, while the non-exposed cohort includes patients who receive an alternative diagnosis and are managed without surgical intervention. The two groups will be compared with respect to changes in cognitive and motor performance, CSF biomarker profiles, and neuroimaging parameters.
Secondary analyses will explore associations between changes in cognitive and motor outcomes, CSF biomarkers, neuroimaging features, and surgical outcomes, including clinical response at 6 months following surgery when available within the study timeframe.
The study combines prospectively collected data with retrospectively available clinical data to provide a comprehensive characterization of patients with suspected iNPH and to support improved diagnostic accuracy and surgical candidate selection.
Primary outcome measures
- Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) total score after CSF tap test [Time frame: Baseline and 72 hours post-CSF tap test]
Secondary outcome measures (7)
- Change in Simple Visual Reaction Time After CSF Tap Test [Time frame: Baseline and 72 hours post-CSF tap test]
- Change in Go/No-Go Test Accuracy After CSF Tap Test [Time frame: Baseline and 72 hours post-CSF tap test]
- Change in Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test Score After CSF Tap Test [Time frame: Baseline and 72 hours post-CSF tap test]
- Change in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) Score After CSF Tap Test [Time frame: Baseline and 72 hours post-CSF tap test]
- Change in Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment Score After CSF Tap Test [Time frame: Difference in total Tinetti score (range 0-28) between baseline and 72 hours after CSF tap test. Higher scores indicate better gait and balance performance.]
- Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Profile Differences Between Surgical and Non-Surgical Patients [Time frame: Baseline (at diagnostic lumbar puncture)]
- Association Between Multimodal Markers and Six-Month Surgical Outcome [Time frame: Baseline through 6 months post-surgery]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Age 60 years or older.
- Patients with suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus referred to the institutional diagnostic, therapeutic, and care pathway.
- Ability to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
- Refusal or inability to provide informed consent.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
Study locations
Italy · 2 centers
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico — Milan
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico — Milan
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07427836 · 0048426-U