Menu
Recruiting NCT07390318

Bowel Continence Across the Lifespan in People With Spina Bifida

Observational Spina Bifida Neurogenic Bowel Bowel Incontinence

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Retrograde Enema, Antegrade Enema.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Spina Bifida, Neurogenic Bowel, Bowel Incontinence. Basic parameters: from 5 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Comparing Antegrade Versus Retrograde Enemas To Improve Bowel Continence Across the Lifespan in People With Spina Bifida

Overview

The goal of this observational study is to learn how different enema programs affect bowel control in children and adults with spina bifida. An enema program involves putting liquid into the large intestine (colon) to help someone poop. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. How well do different enema programs prevent bowel accidents? 2. How do these enema programs affect independence, bowel symptoms, and quality of life? Researchers will compare two types of enema programs to see which works better and is easier for participants to manage. Participants starting a new enema program will answer online survey questions at 3 different timepoints over the course of 1 year.

Detailed description

Spina bifida is a rare disease affecting an estimated 166,000 people in the United States. Because of the birth defect in the spinal cord, many organ systems do not work properly. Included among these affected organ systems are the bowels or intestines, which can lead to bowel incontinence or bowel accidents. Bowel incontinence is very disruptive to the lives of people with spina bifida by affecting their ability to have romantic relationships, find jobs, and overall enjoy their lives. The spina bifida community has recognized bowel incontinence as a top priority for research.

Typically, reducing bowel incontinence and improving bowel continence occurs in a stepwise fashion. After medications by mouth such as laxatives or stool softeners, 2nd line treatments include enema programs. Two types of enema programs currently exist, those given in either a backward direction (given through the anus or end of the large intestine or colon) or in a forward direction (given through a tube that enters the start of the large intestine or colon). These two types of enema programs have different positives and negatives which have not been compared nor studied well. The lack of evidence on which is the better enema program presents a key decisional dilemma for many people with spina bifida who want to improve their bowel continence.

In the current study, the study team will compare the two types of enema programs in 943 children and adults ages 5 years old and up with spina bifida at 24 centers across the United States. The enema programs will be assigned to and started by the participants as part of usual clinical care from their local clinical team. At 6 months and 12 months over a 1-year study period, the study team will look at how the two types of enema programs compare in bowel continence (how well they work to prevent bowel accidents), quality of life (how much people enjoy their lives), bowel symptoms (how well they work to reduce bowel-related symptoms), self-management and independence (how well people can do these enema programs themselves without help), and healthcare utilization (how often these enema programs cause problems needing medical help). The study team will also ask 20 children with spina bifida, 20 adults with spina bifida, and 20 caregivers of children and adults with spina bifida more detailed interview questions about their lived experiences with managing bowel incontinence and their thoughts on how best to start and maintain a successful enema program. The expected study results will help people with spina bifida not only improve their bowel continence, but also their quality of life.

The study team is working with patient and family partners within the spina bifida community, healthcare providers across numerous disciplines, national advocacy organizations (the Spina Bifida Association), and industry partners who make enema devices to design and conduct this study.

Interventions

  • Procedure Retrograde Enema
    A retrograde enema is a bowel management technique in which the enema is given through the rectum (end of the colon). This includes cone enemas, foley balloon enemas, and Transanal irrigation (e.g. Peristeen, Navina).
  • Procedure Antegrade Enema
    An antegrade enema is a bowel management technique in which an enema is given through a surgically-created tube that enters at the start of the colon. This includes MACES, cecostomy buttons, and Chait tubes.

Primary outcome measures

  • Bowel continence [Time frame: Before starting enema program, 6 months after starting enema program, 1 year after starting enema program]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Bowel symptoms and satisfaction [Time frame: Before starting enema program, 6 months after starting enema program, 1 year after starting enema program]
  • Disease-specific quality of life [Time frame: Before starting enema program, 6 months after starting enema program, 1 year after starting enema program]
  • Overall quality of life [Time frame: Before starting enema program, 6 months after starting enema program, 1 year after starting enema program.]
  • Self-management and independence [Time frame: Before starting enema program, 6 months after starting enema program, 1 year after starting enema program]
  • Rate of unplanned healthcare utilization related to bowel issues [Time frame: For 1 year after starting enema program]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Minimum age 5 years old
  • Myelomeningocele diagnosis
  • Starting a retrograde or antegrade enema program (or switching from one enema program to the other)
  • English or Spanish speaking/literate

Exclusion criteria

\- Other types of spinal dysraphism (e.g., lipomyelomeningocele, fatty filum)

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

United States · 24 centers
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham — Birmingham
  • Children's of Alabama — Birmingham
  • Phoenix Children's Hospital — Phoenix
  • Children's Hospital of Los Angeles — Los Angeles
  • University of California San Francisco — San Francisco
  • Children's Hospital of Colorado — Denver
  • Children's National Hospital — Washington D.C.
  • Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — Chicago
  • … and 16 more centers

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07390318 · STUDY00000320

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗