Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07376850

Time in rANge vs. Time in nOrmal Glycemia for Better Glycemic Control

No phase Interventional Diabetes Diabetes (DM) Diabetes Type 1

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Structured Diabetes Education, Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) System Adjustment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Diabetes, Diabetes (DM), Diabetes Type 1. Basic parameters: 5 years — 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Czechia, Israel, Poland
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

The TANGO study is a 12-month study involving 120 children and adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) across the Czech Republic, Israel, and Poland who use automated insulin delivery (AID) systems. Currently, the global standard for diabetes management is "Time in Range" (TIR), which aims to keep blood sugar levels between 70-180 mg/dL. However, newer technologies like AID systems may now allow for a tighter, more physiological goal called "Time in Normal Glycemia" (TING), which targets a range of 70-140 mg/dL. This study will randomly assign participants to follow either the standard TIR target or the tighter TING target to see if the narrower range improves overall blood sugar control and HbA1c without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia, family stress, or daily treatment burden. By comparing these two approaches, researchers hope to determine if clinical guidelines should be updated to reflect a more precise glucose target for children and adolescents worldwide

Detailed description

This multinational, multicenter, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the clinical impact of targeting Time in Normal Glycemia (TING; 70-140 mg/dL) compared to the current standard, Time in Range (TIR; 70-180 mg/dL), in children and adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D).

Background and Rationale Managing glucose levels in pediatric T1D is essential for preventing long-term complications. While the international consensus currently recommends maintaining a TIR \>70%, recent technological advances-such as automated insulin delivery (AID) systems and next-generation continuous glucose monitors (CGM)-now make it feasible to target narrower, more physiological glucose ranges. TING (70-140 mg/dL) has emerged as a potential new clinical metric for improved metabolic compensation. However, there is no definitive evidence yet that aiming for this tighter range leads to better long-term outcomes than the standard TIR without increasing treatment burden or psychological stress.

Study Objectives The primary objective is to determine if setting TING as the glycemic target improves CGM-derived glycemic metrics compared to the standard TIR approach.

Secondary objectives include:

Evaluating changes in HbA1c. Assessing differences in Quality of Life (QoL) and treatment burden using standardized patient and caregiver questionnaires.

Monitoring the safety and incidence of acute complications, such as severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).

Study Design and Population The study will enroll 120 children and adolescents (ages 5.0-17.99) across three tertiary pediatric diabetes centers in the Czech Republic, Israel, and Poland. All participants must be using AID systems and have used a CGM for at least 70% of the time in the month prior to enrollment.

From the target population, we aim to recruit 25% of individuals newly diagnosed.

Intervention and Methods

Participants will be randomized 1:1 into two groups:

TING Group (Intervention): Will follow a target glucose range of 70-140 mg/dL (3.9-7.8 mmol/L).

TIR Group (Control): Will follow the standard target range of 70-180 mg/dL (3.9-10.0 mmol/L).

Both groups will receive structured education from a multidisciplinary team regarding CGM interpretation, glycemic targets, and self-management. In the TING group, CGM hyperglycemia targets will be lowered by at least 10% from baseline.

Timeline and Endpoints The study duration is 12 months. Data collection includes CGM metrics, insulin dose data, and HbA1c at 3-month intervals (Months 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12). A telephone check-up will occur 6 weeks after baseline to assess early adherence and treatment satisfaction.

Primary Endpoint: Change in TIR (70-180 mg/dL) between baseline and 12 months.

Secondary/Exploratory Endpoints: Percentage of time in TING, time in hypoglycemia (Levels 1 and 2), glycemic variability, and various QoL scores (PAID, INSPIRE, Hypoglycemia/Hyperglycemia Fear Surveys) .

Impact If targeting TING is proven beneficial and acceptable, the results of this trial could inform future clinical guidelines and redefine optimal glycemic targets for pediatric diabetes care globally.

Interventions

  • Other Structured Diabetes Education
    A comprehensive standardized guideline will be provided to recruiting physicians from all centers, including the points below: 1. Understanding CGM data and trend interpretation 2. TIR or TING concepts according to randomization, target range, consequences of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia 3. Recognizing and management of hypoglycemia 4. Recognizing and management of hyperglycemia 5. Setting and adjusting of glycemic targets, alarms in CGM and insulin pumps, and insulin doses based on randomisa
  • Other Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) System Adjustment
    For the TING group, CGM hyperglycemia target settings will be lowered by at-least 10% from the baseline values. The extent of the adjustment will be at the discretion of the attending physician

Primary outcome measures

  • Primary Endpoint [Time frame: 12 months]
Secondary outcome measures (6)
  • Diabetes-Related Emotional Distress in Pediatric Participants (PAID-Teen [Time frame: At enrollment, 6 months and 12 months]
  • Participant Perceptions of Diabetes Technology - INSPIRE Patient Scale [Time frame: At enrollment, 6 months and 12 months]
  • Quality of Life (QoL) Related to Diabetes Technology - INSPIRE Parent/Caregiver Scale [Time frame: At enrollment, 6 months and 12 months]
  • Parent/Caregiver Fear of Hypoglycemia (HFS-P) [Time frame: At enrollment, 6 months and 12 months]
  • Parent/Caregiver Fear and Behaviors Related to Hyperglycemia (HAQ) [Time frame: At enrollment, 6 months and 12 months]
  • Diabetes-Related Emotional Distress in Parents/Caregivers (PAID-PR) [Time frame: At enrollment, 6 months and 12 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of T1D per ADA criteria
  • Age 5.0-17.99 at the start of study
  • CGM use >70% of the time during the month prior to enrollment
  • Maximum HbA1c of 86mmol/mol (10% in DCCT)

Exclusion criteria

  • No concurrent illnesses impacting glycemia
  • No treatments impacting glycemia
  • Severe hypoglycemia documented in the 60 day period leading up to patient recruitment
  • Current participation in any other interventional study
  • Any significant diseases / conditions including psychiatric disorders and substance abuse that in the opinion of the investigator is likely to affect the subject's ability to complete the study or compromise participant's safety
  • Female subject who is pregnant or lactating or planning to become pregnant within the planned study duration

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Czechia · 1 center
  • Motol University Hospital — Prague
Israel · 1 center
  • Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel — Petah Tikva
Poland · 1 center
  • Medical University of Warsaw — Warsaw

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07376850 · TANGO

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗