Assessing the Effectiveness of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) With Personalized Feedback Intervention to Reduce Polysubstance Impaired Driving in Young Adults Aged 18-30
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Personalize Feedback Intervention.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Impaired Driving. Basic parameters: 18 years — 30 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
The current study is assessing the effects of receiving Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment alone versus also receiving a brief online personalized intervention on impaired driving behaviors among Washington State young adults aged 18-30.
Detailed description
The current project is inviting young adult aged 18-30 in Washington State who screen at moderate or moderate to high risk or who report impaired driving during Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment. Consented young adults would be randomized to receive a brief online personalized intervention or waitlist control and be assessed at enrollment and 3 months later. A selection of participants will be assessed at 6 months.
Interventions
- Behavioral Personalize Feedback Intervention
The brief online personalized feedback intervention (PFI) is adapted from the personalized feedback provided in BASICS, iCHAMP, studies using similar standalone PFI approaches. Specifically, feedback adapted from these brief motivational interventions and prior projects include: Patterns of use: alcohol, cannabis, other drug, and polysubstance use frequency, alcohol and cannabis quantity and peak; Substance use norms; Expectancies of use of alcohol ; Estimates on money the participant spends on
Primary outcome measures
- Number of times in the past 3 months participants drove impaired by both alcohol and cannabis at 3 month follow-up [Time frame: From baseline to 3 months later at 3 month follow up assessment.]
Secondary outcome measures (11)
- Number of times in the past 3 months participants drove impaired by both alcohol and cannabis at 6 month follow-up [Time frame: From 3 month after completing baseline to 3 months later at the 6 month follow-up assessment]
- Number of times in the past 3 months participants drove impaired by alcohol only at 3 month follow-up [Time frame: From baseline to 3 months later at 3 month follow-up assessment]
- Number of times in the past 3 months participants drove impaired by cannabis only at 3 month follow-up [Time frame: From baseline to 3 months later at 3 month follow-up assessment]
- Number of times in the past 3 months participants drove impaired by alcohol only at 6 month follow-up [Time frame: From 3 months after baseline to 3 months later at 6 month follow-up assessment]
- Number of times in the past 3 months participants drove impaired by cannabis only at 6 month follow-up [Time frame: From 3 months after baseline to 3 months later at 6 month follow-up assessment]
- Reported wait time to drive after using both alcohol and cannabis measured in minutes at 3 month follow up [Time frame: From baseline to 3 months later at 3 month follow up assessment.]
- Reported wait time to drive after using alcohol measured in minutes at 3 month follow up [Time frame: From baseline to 3 months later at 3 month follow up assessment.]
- Reported wait time to drive after using cannabis measured in minutes at 3 month follow up [Time frame: From baseline to 3 months later at 3 month follow up assessment.]
- Reported wait time to drive after using both alcohol and cannabis measured in minutes at 6 month follow up [Time frame: From 3 months after baseline to 3 months later at 6 month follow-up assessment]
- Reported wait time to drive after using alcohol measured in minutes at 6 month follow up [Time frame: From 3 months after baseline to 3 months later at 6 month follow-up assessment]
- Reported wait time to drive after using cannabis measured in minutes at 6 month follow up [Time frame: From 3 months after baseline to 3 months later at 6 month follow-up assessment]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Aged 18-30 at enrollment
- Received Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in the past 3 month
- Through SBIRT screened at moderate or moderate-to-high risk based on substance use OR reported any impaired driving the past 6 months
- Lives in Washington State
- Received a study information card from an SBIRT provider
- Consents to having Zip Code use for analyses
- Consents to randomization to receive brief online personalized intervention or waitlist control
Exclusion criteria
- Not meeting eligibility criteria
- Inability to confirm participant's identity, residency, or date received SBIRT.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07368894 · STUDY00023076 · U01CE003725 · Project 7744