Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07358000

Double-blind, Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial in Atopic Dermatitis: Comparison of Lipikar Balm and Relipid+ Balm in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis in Children and Adults

No phase Interventional Atopic Dermatitis Emollients

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Baume Relipid+.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Atopic Dermatitis, Emollients. Basic parameters: No limits · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

AIMSI Trial : Double-blind, Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial in Atopic Dermatitis: Comparison of Lipikar Balm and Relipid+ Balm in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis in Children and Adults

Overview

The therapeutic cornerstone for mild to moderate forms of atopic dermatitis (AD) relies on the combination of topical corticosteroids and emollients. However, the daily application of emollients can be burdensome, leading to poor adherence, treatment fatigue, and therapeutic failure, often prompting a switch in emollient products. Emollients therefore represent a true therapeutic challenge. They also raise economic concerns, as they are not reimbursed by national health insurance, unlike topical corticosteroids. This results in an out-of-pocket expense for patients, adding a significant financial burden in the context of this chronic skin condition. Laboratoires Gilbert have developed and patented an active ingredient derived from seawater (Active Oligo Skin), formulated and produced at their pharmaceutical site in Hérouville Saint Clair. This active compound has shown promising in vitro and preclinical results in modulating inflammatory mechanisms involved in sensitive and atopic skin. The objective of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of Laboratoires Gilbert's patented emollient balm (Relipid+) with a reference emollient balm considered the "gold standard" and most frequently prescribed on the market (Lipikar Baume AP+M, La Roche-Posay) for atopic dermatitis. The hypothesis is that the test balm will be at least as effective as the gold standard (non-inferiority) in clinical terms, with an added benefit on microbiome diversity-an emerging and critical issue in the management of atopic dermatitis.

Interventions

  • Other Baume Relipid+
    Application of daily emollient

Primary outcome measures

  • SCORAD measurment [Time frame: Day 0; Day 7; Day 28; Day 70]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • DLQI (Quality of life) [Time frame: Day 7 and Day 14]
  • Itch NRS scale (Itch Numeric Rating Scale) [Time frame: Day 4 and Day 14]
  • Use of topical steroids [Time frame: Day 70 at the end of the study]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

Patients aged 6 months to 70 years with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (SCORAD < 40)

Time to treatment initiation < 72 hours between initial assessment and balm application

Affiliated with the French national health insurance system and French-speaking

Written informed consent must be obtained

Exclusion criteria

Patients who decline participation

Patients under legal guardianship, curatorship, legal protection, or judicial safeguard

Patients with a SCORAD indicating the need for systemic therapy

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

France · 1 center
  • CHU Caen Normandie — Caen

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07358000 · 2024-A02369-38

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗