Menu
Recruiting NCT07356687

Effects of rTMS Combined With Dual-Task Gait Training on Walking and Cognition After Stroke

No phase Interventional Stroke

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: active rTMS with dual-task training, sham rTMS with dual-task training.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Stroke. Basic parameters: from 50 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Hong Kong
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Effects of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex rTMS Primed Dual-Task Gait Training on Walking and Cognitive Outcomes After Stroke: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial

Overview

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial will investigate whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) can enhance the effects of dual-task gait training in people with chronic stroke. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive either active rTMS or sham rTMS immediately before the same standardized dual-task gait training program. The intervention includes 12 sessions over 3 weeks. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, immediately after training, and at 4-week follow-up. Co-primary outcomes are dual-task mobility and cognitive performance during walking, quantified using dual-task cost (DTC) for gait speed and cognitive-task performance during dual-task walking (e.g., Serial 7s; Shopping List Recall). Secondary outcomes include balance/mobility, community participation, mood/sleep measures, and fall incidence. To explore mechanisms, prefrontal cortex activity during single- and dual-task walking will be recorded using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), and mediation analyses will examine whether changes in PFC activity explain intervention effects.

Detailed description

Cognitive-motor interference after stroke can reduce walking safety and functional independence, especially during everyday dual-task situations. Dual-task gait training can improve performance, but response varies, potentially due to limitations in executive control and prefrontal network engagement. The DLPFC is central to attention and executive function; therefore, rTMS targeting the DLPFC may prime relevant neural circuits and improve responsiveness to subsequent dual-task training.

This study is a parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Community dwelling adults with chronic unilateral stroke will be recruited and randomized 1:1. Participants and outcome assessors will be blinded.

Both groups will complete 12 supervised sessions over 3 weeks. In each session, participants will first receive either: Active rTMS to the DLPFC of the affected hemisphere (5 Hz; 90% resting motor threshold; total 1,200 pulses), or Sham rTMS using the placebo side of the coil with similar auditory sensations.

Dual-task gait training will begin shortly after stimulation. Training will combine functional walking/balance tasks with progressively challenging cognitive tasks (e.g., mental arithmetic, verbal fluency, working memory tasks, and a shopping-list recall task), with difficulty adjusted to participant ability.

Assessments will be conducted at baseline, post-intervention, and 4-week follow-up. Co-primary outcomes are DTC of gait speed and cognitive performance during dual-task walking.

Interventions

  • Other active rTMS with dual-task training
    Participants will receive active rTMS targeting the DLPFC of the affected hemisphere before each training session: 5 Hz, 90% resting motor threshold (RMT), 10-second trains with 30-second inter-train intervals, total 1,200 pulses (≈ 16 minutes) per session. Dual-task gait training will start within \~10 minutes after rTMS. The program includes 12 sessions over 3 weeks.
  • Other sham rTMS with dual-task training
    Participants will receive sham rTMS delivered using the placebo side of the same coil at the same DLPFC target location and with identical session duration and procedures (≈ 16 minutes) before each training session. Dual-task gait training will start within \~10 minutes after sham stimulation. The program includes 12 sessions over 3 weeks.

Primary outcome measures

  • Dual-task cost (DTC) of walking speed (%) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
  • Dual-task cost (DTC) of cognitive performance (%) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
  • Timed Up and Go (TUG) time (seconds) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
  • Mini-BESTest total score [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
  • Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC) score [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
  • Fall incidence (number of falls) [Time frame: During 12 months post-intervention follow-up]
  • Stride length (cm) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
  • Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI) score [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
  • Cadence (steps/min) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
  • Double support time (%) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
  • Gait Speed (m/s) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
  • Foot Strike Angle (degrees) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
  • Turns - Duration (seconds) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
  • Session-level perceived fatigue (0-10 rating) [Time frame: Before and after each training session (3 weeks)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic hemispheric stroke
  • Age ≥ 50 years

-≥ 6 months post-stroke

  • Medically stable
  • Able to walk independently ≥ 1 minute (assistive device allowed)
  • Able to follow commands
  • mRS 1-3
  • MoCA ≥ 22

Exclusion criteria

  • Other neurological disorders
  • Cerebellar/brainstem injury
  • TMS contraindications (e.g., pacemaker, intracranial metal, seizure history, pregnancy)
  • Contraindications to exercise (e.g., unstable angina)
  • Severe aphasia (NIHSS item 9 ≥ 2)
  • Pain/illness limiting performance
  • Concurrent formal rehabilitation elsewhere
  • RMT cannot be determined
  • Fails TMS safety screening

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Hong Kong · 1 center
  • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University — Hong Kong

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07356687 · HSEARS20250731004

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗