Effects of rTMS Combined With Dual-Task Gait Training on Walking and Cognition After Stroke
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: active rTMS with dual-task training, sham rTMS with dual-task training.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Stroke. Basic parameters: from 50 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Hong Kong
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Effects of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex rTMS Primed Dual-Task Gait Training on Walking and Cognitive Outcomes After Stroke: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial
Overview
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial will investigate whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) can enhance the effects of dual-task gait training in people with chronic stroke. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive either active rTMS or sham rTMS immediately before the same standardized dual-task gait training program. The intervention includes 12 sessions over 3 weeks. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, immediately after training, and at 4-week follow-up. Co-primary outcomes are dual-task mobility and cognitive performance during walking, quantified using dual-task cost (DTC) for gait speed and cognitive-task performance during dual-task walking (e.g., Serial 7s; Shopping List Recall). Secondary outcomes include balance/mobility, community participation, mood/sleep measures, and fall incidence. To explore mechanisms, prefrontal cortex activity during single- and dual-task walking will be recorded using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), and mediation analyses will examine whether changes in PFC activity explain intervention effects.
Detailed description
Cognitive-motor interference after stroke can reduce walking safety and functional independence, especially during everyday dual-task situations. Dual-task gait training can improve performance, but response varies, potentially due to limitations in executive control and prefrontal network engagement. The DLPFC is central to attention and executive function; therefore, rTMS targeting the DLPFC may prime relevant neural circuits and improve responsiveness to subsequent dual-task training.
This study is a parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Community dwelling adults with chronic unilateral stroke will be recruited and randomized 1:1. Participants and outcome assessors will be blinded.
Both groups will complete 12 supervised sessions over 3 weeks. In each session, participants will first receive either: Active rTMS to the DLPFC of the affected hemisphere (5 Hz; 90% resting motor threshold; total 1,200 pulses), or Sham rTMS using the placebo side of the coil with similar auditory sensations.
Dual-task gait training will begin shortly after stimulation. Training will combine functional walking/balance tasks with progressively challenging cognitive tasks (e.g., mental arithmetic, verbal fluency, working memory tasks, and a shopping-list recall task), with difficulty adjusted to participant ability.
Assessments will be conducted at baseline, post-intervention, and 4-week follow-up. Co-primary outcomes are DTC of gait speed and cognitive performance during dual-task walking.
Interventions
- Other active rTMS with dual-task training
Participants will receive active rTMS targeting the DLPFC of the affected hemisphere before each training session: 5 Hz, 90% resting motor threshold (RMT), 10-second trains with 30-second inter-train intervals, total 1,200 pulses (≈ 16 minutes) per session. Dual-task gait training will start within \~10 minutes after rTMS. The program includes 12 sessions over 3 weeks. - Other sham rTMS with dual-task training
Participants will receive sham rTMS delivered using the placebo side of the same coil at the same DLPFC target location and with identical session duration and procedures (≈ 16 minutes) before each training session. Dual-task gait training will start within \~10 minutes after sham stimulation. The program includes 12 sessions over 3 weeks.
Primary outcome measures
- Dual-task cost (DTC) of walking speed (%) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
- Dual-task cost (DTC) of cognitive performance (%) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
- Timed Up and Go (TUG) time (seconds) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
- Mini-BESTest total score [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
- Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC) score [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
- Fall incidence (number of falls) [Time frame: During 12 months post-intervention follow-up]
- Stride length (cm) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
- Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI) score [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
- Cadence (steps/min) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
- Double support time (%) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
- Gait Speed (m/s) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
- Foot Strike Angle (degrees) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
- Turns - Duration (seconds) [Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week post-intervention follow-up (Week 8)]
- Session-level perceived fatigue (0-10 rating) [Time frame: Before and after each training session (3 weeks)]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic hemispheric stroke
- Age ≥ 50 years
-≥ 6 months post-stroke
- Medically stable
- Able to walk independently ≥ 1 minute (assistive device allowed)
- Able to follow commands
- mRS 1-3
- MoCA ≥ 22
Exclusion criteria
- Other neurological disorders
- Cerebellar/brainstem injury
- TMS contraindications (e.g., pacemaker, intracranial metal, seizure history, pregnancy)
- Contraindications to exercise (e.g., unstable angina)
- Severe aphasia (NIHSS item 9 ≥ 2)
- Pain/illness limiting performance
- Concurrent formal rehabilitation elsewhere
- RMT cannot be determined
- Fails TMS safety screening
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Double blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Hong Kong · 1 center
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic University — Hong Kong
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07356687 · HSEARS20250731004