Percutaneous Drainage Versus Antibiotic Therapy for Acute Diverticulitis With Abscess.
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Arm 1 (Control Arm) - Percutaneous drainage plus antibiotics: Image-guided (CT or ultrasound) percutaneous drainage performed within 48 hours of randomization with intravenous bro, Arm 2 (Experimental Arm) - Antibiotics alone: Intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics: piperacillin-tazobactam 4 g/0.5 g q6h (dosage to be adjusted based on renal function) according to the recent lite.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Diverticular Disease of Colon. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Percutaneous Drainage Versus Antibiotic Therapy for Acute Diverticulitis With Abscess. The PANDA Randomized Controlled Trial Pilot Study
Overview
the management of diverticular abscesses is guided by consensus-based recommendations from the WSES guidelines, the American College of Physicians, and the American Gastroenterological Association, all of which acknowledge the predominance of anecdotal and observational evidence and the urgent need for randomized controlled trials to inform clinical practice.The PANDA trial (Percutaneous drainage versus Antibiotic therapy for acute Diverticulitis with Abscess. Randomized controlled trial) is designed to address this evidence gap by directly comparing percutaneous drainage plus antibiotics versus antibiotics alone in patients with acute diverticulitis and large abscesses (WSES stage 2A). By employing strict inclusion criteria, standardized interventions, and predefined outcome measures, this study aims to clarify the relative efficacy, safety, and long-term impact of the two strategies, thereby guiding future clinical decision-making and informing guideline recommendations. However, before we can proceed with the launch of the PANDA trial, we need to start a pilot study that will allow us to understand both the methodological and practical feasibility of starting this pilot study. Primary objective The PANDA trial pilot study want to evaluate the local feasibility of the individual centers under study. Specifically, the primary objective will be to assess a minimum adherence rate of 70% for each participating center out of all patients with acute diverticulitis WSES 2A being evaluated. Adherence refers to the ability to enroll patients, randomize them, and perform clinical follow-up. Secondary objectives The Panda trial pilot study want to compare the efficacy of antibiotic therapy alone versus percutaneous drainage plus antibiotic therapy in achieving complete clinical resolution at 30 days in patients with acute diverticulitis classified as WSES stage 2A, presenting with a pericolic or distant abscess ≥4 cm and \< 8 cm in size. In addition the PANDA trial pilot study wants to compare the rate of treatment failure, defined as the need for urgent surgical intervention (e.g., colectomy, resection with or without stoma formation) within 30 days. Moreover the PANDA trial aimed to asses: the recurrence rate of diverticulitis after 90 days, defined as a new clinical episode confirmed radiologically and requiring hospital admission; to evaluate the length of hospital stay; to record and compare adverse events related to each treatment strategy, graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, with a focus on procedure-specific complications in the drainage arm. Study Design The PANDA trial pilot study is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial designed to compare two accepted non operative strategies for the management of large diverticular abscesses (WSES 2A Stage) to evaluate the methodological and structural feasibility of a national RCT. Participating centres will include high-volume emergency and general surgery units with access to both advanced interventional radiology and standardized medical management protocols. Two Intervention arms: * Arm 1 (Control Arm) - Percutaneous drainage plus antibiotics. * Arm 2 (Experimental Arm) - Antibiotics alone In both arms the patients will be evaluated daily clinically and through laboratory tests. Collaborators at each participating center will prospectively collect data for all eligible patients for 6 months followed by 3 months of follow-up.
Interventions
- Procedure Arm 1 (Control Arm) - Percutaneous drainage plus antibiotics: Image-guided (CT or ultrasound) percutaneous drainage performed within 48 hours of randomization with intravenous bro
CT or ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage - Other Arm 2 (Experimental Arm) - Antibiotics alone: Intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics: piperacillin-tazobactam 4 g/0.5 g q6h (dosage to be adjusted based on renal function) according to the recent lite
Antibiotic therapy alone
Primary outcome measures
- Primary outcome [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
- Secondary outcomes [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 9 months]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patients of both sexes, ≥ 18 years old.
- Patients with abdominal CT scan diagnosis of colonic AD classifiable as WSES 2A with abscess ≥4 cm and < 8 cm in size;
- Patients with haemodynamic stability at hospital admission and no clinical or radiological evidence of diffuse peritonitis.
- Patients who accept and sign the informed consent
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with a final diagnosis other than diverticular abscess, including those diagnosed with colonic cancer.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- Immunosuppressed patients.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07352605 · ASFirenze26