Diagnostic Value and Safety of Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Mediastinal Cryobiopsy Versus Transbronchial Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Lymphoma: a Randomized Controlled Trial
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration, Endobronchial ultrasound-guided tranbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Mediastinal and Hilar Lymphadenopathy. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn which of two minimally invasive procedures is better at safely diagnosing lymphoma in the mediastinum (chest) in adults (aged 18 and older) who are suspected to have either a new or a returning (relapsed) lymphoma. The main questions it aims to answer are: Which procedure, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TBMC) or endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), has a higher success rate in obtaining a definitive diagnosis? Is one procedure safer than the other in terms of complications? Researchers will compare the EBUS-TBMC group to the EBUS-TBNA group to see if the cryobiopsy technique leads to better diagnostic results and has a similar or better safety profile. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to undergo one of the two diagnostic procedures (EBUS-TBMC or EBUS-TBNA) during a single bronchoscopy session. Have their tissue samples analyzed by pathologists. Be followed clinically for at least 6 months to confirm the final diagnosis.
Interventions
- Procedure Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration
After the target lymph nodes are determined and the safety of needle aspiration is ensured, a 19-G needle will be placed in the working channel of the EBUS scope. The tip of the sheath of the needle will be visible on the endobronchial view, and the needle will then be allowed to pierce the airway wall and enter the lymph node using the jabbing technique under direct ultrasound guidance. A 50-mL syringe will be used to collect 20 mL of aspirates, which will be maintained for 20 s. Each lymph nod - Procedure Endobronchial ultrasound-guided tranbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy
After the target lymph node is located (vascular structures will be excluded via the Doppler function), a tunnel will be made between the target lymph node and the airway wall using a 19-G needle. Subsequently, a 1.1-mm cryoprobe (Erbe 20 402-401, ERBE, Tübingen, Germany) will be inserted through the tunnel and positioned within the target lymph node under EBUS monitoring. The distance between the cryoprobe tip and the lymph node edge will be confirmed to be \>5 mm in all four directions. Afterw
Primary outcome measures
- Diagnostic yield [Time frame: 7 days after sampling]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
- Diagnostic sensitivity [Time frame: 7 days after smpling]
- Incidence of complications [Time frame: 7 days after sampling]
- Rate of specimen adequacy [Time frame: 7 days after sampling]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Presence of mediastinal lymphadenopathy of unknown etiology.
- Clinical suspicion of lymphoma, based on any of the following:
Previous history of lymphoma (suspected relapse). Presence of lymphoma at another site. Clinical and radiographic findings suggestive of new isolated mediastinal lymphoma (e.g., isolated idiopathic bulky mediastinal adenopathy with or without systemic symptoms), as assessed by the study bronchoscopists.
Exclusion criteria
- A more probable alternative cause for lymphadenopathy is identified (e.g., lung cancer or other non-lymphoproliferative malignancies).
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Diagnostic
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07352267 · DETECTION-LYM