Miro3D Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Standard of Care Treatment or Standard of Care Treatment plus Miro3D Wound Matrix, Standard of Care Treatment or Standard of Care Treatment plus Miro3D Wound Matrix.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Wound. Basic parameters: 18 years — 90 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial of Miro3D Wound Matrix With Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in Treating Acute Soft Tissue Wounds and Chronic Pressure Ulcerations
Overview
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the outcomes for patients managed with standard of care (SOC) wound treatments and those managed with standard of care treatment and tissue scaffolds, specifically Miro 3D. Tissue scaffolds like Miro 3D are 3-dimentional frameworks for collagen protein that provide structure and protection to help wounds heal.
Detailed description
Acellular tissue scaffolds, such as Miro3D, were developed to aid in the management of complex tissue defect wounds and ulcerations by providing a structural matrix that supports cellular infiltration and tissue regeneration. However, high-quality prospective data remain limited, particularly regarding soft tissue deficits and pressure ulcerations. This prospective RCT is designed to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of subjects randomized to receive either SOC alone or SOC with the addition of tissue scaffolding techniques (Miro3D) over a twelve (12)-week timeframe.
The trial will investigate two categories of complex wounds: soft tissue wounds, including post-fasciotomy wounds and wounds resulting from necrotizing skin and soft tissue infection (NSSTI), and chronic pressure ulcerations, with a focus on decubitus and ischial pressure ulcers. The trial aims to generate real-world data, including cost-effectiveness parameters, and features a crossover arm to evaluate the impact of delayed wound bed preparation and the application of tissue scaffolds.
Additionally, the trial will evaluate healing quality using digital wound photography and mathematical analysis of wound redness as a surrogate marker for granulation tissue formation. Time to hospital discharge will also be tracked for acute wounds to assess cost and resource utilization. By analyzing the effectiveness of Miro3D in combination with SOC, this trial seeks to provide meaningful insights into optimizing wound management strategies.
Interventions
- Other Standard of Care Treatment or Standard of Care Treatment plus Miro3D Wound Matrix
Subjects with lower extremity three-dimensional tissue defects, including those resulting from elevated calf intra-compartmental hypertension treated with decompressive fasciotomies or serious NSSTIs of the foot or lower extremities (including the pelvis as part of the lower extremity). These defects must have been controlled with surgical debridement. Subjects will be randomized to either SOC alone or SOC plus the application of Miro3D tissue scaffolding. - Other Standard of Care Treatment or Standard of Care Treatment plus Miro3D Wound Matrix
Subjects with complex pressure ulcerations, particularly decubitus or ischial pressure ulcerations (Stage III or greater). These subjects will be randomized to either SOC alone or SOC plus Miro3D tissue scaffolding.
Primary outcome measures
- Rate of change defined as Percentage Area Reduction or PAR at four weeks after placement or not of the MIRO3D. [Time frame: 4 weeks]
Secondary outcome measures (7)
- Assess frequency of MIRO3D applications over a 12-week treatment period [Time frame: 12 weeks]
- Assess cost of care, including operating room time and time to hospital discharge for acute wounds [Time frame: 12 weeks]
- Assess NPWT use [Time frame: 12 weeks]
- Assess cellular findings from tissue sampling [Time frame: 12 weeks]
- Assess antibiotic use [Time frame: 12 weeks]
- Assess pain [Time frame: 12 weeks]
- Assess subject-reported ability to move to self-care [Time frame: 12 weeks]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Subjects must fulfill all the following inclusion criteria to qualify for enrollment:
- Men or women 18-90 years of age at enrollment.
- Ability to sign consent by subject or LAR.
- Wounds in one of the two arms:
- A. Soft tissue wounds with a minimum size of 1 cm x 1 cm surface area and a maximum size of 40 cm L x 20 cm W x 5 cm D, resulting from either post-fasciotomy or post-NSSTI, including the pelvis with the lower extremity. Fasciotomies must have undergone complete debridement and, in the opinion of a trial investigator, be appropriate for wound healing but not ready for primary closure at randomization.
- B. Chronic, complex pressure ulcers classified as Stage III or higher, located in the decubitus or ischial region, that have not achieved at least a 50% reduction in ulcer area despite receiving documented SOC treatment for a minimum of four (4) weeks, with confirmed patient compliance.
- Subjects must agree to proper offloading and/or compression of the wound or ulcer throughout the trial.
- Written informed consent is required for digital photo imaging.
- For the Miro3D plus SOC arm, the wound or ulcer must have a clean base that is free of devitalized tissue or debris at the time of Miro3D placement.
- Subjects receiving NPWT at baseline are eligible for enrollment. The use of NPWT during the trial will be at the discretion of the treating provider.
Exclusion criteria
- Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from trial participation:
- The PAR of the pressure ulcer arm has reduced by 50% or more after four (4) weeks of SOC.
- Wounds with active invasive infection not yet controlled in the opinion of a trial investigator.
- Wounds with vascular insufficiencies requiring revascularization.
- Trial investigator deems the subject has no meaningful wound healing potential (e.g., advanced cancer, severe malnutrition) and/or has conditions that seriously compromise the subject's ability to complete the trial or a known history of non-adherence to medical care.
- Undergoing chemotherapy.
- History of radiation to the area of the index wound or ulcer, regardless of time since last radiation treatment.
- Use of investigational drugs or therapies within thirty (30) days before screening.
- On dialysis.
- Sensitivity, allergy, or contraindication to Miro3D and/or NPWT or its components.
- Presence of third-degree burns.
- Index wound or ulcer exhibiting worsening ischemia or gangrene at screening.
- Subjects moving toward palliative or comfort care.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
United States · 1 center
- Washington University School of Medicine — St Louis
Publications
- Fridman R, Rafat P, Van Gils CC, Horn D, Vayser D, Lambert JC Jr. Treatment of Hard-to-heal Diabetic Foot Ulcers With a Hepatic-derived Wound Matrix. Wounds. 2020 Sep;32(9):244-252. Epub 2020 Jun 21. PMID 32813669
- Doupis J, Veves A. Classification, diagnosis, and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Wounds. 2008 May;20(5):117-26. PMID 25942412
- International best practice guidelines: wound management in diabetic foot ulcers. Wounds Int. May 10, 2013. www.woundsinternational.com/resources/details/best-practice-guidelines-wound-management-diabetic-foot-ulcers
- Singh N, Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. JAMA. 2005 Jan 12;293(2):217-28. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.2.217. PMID 15644549
- NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1513-1530. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00618-8. Epub 2016 Apr 6. PMID 27061677
- Cao X, Lin X, Li N, Zhao X, Zhou M, Zhao Y. Animal tissue-derived biomaterials for promoting wound healing. Mater Horiz. 2023 Aug 29;10(9):3237-3256. doi: 10.1039/d3mh00411b. PMID 37278612
- Chaudhari AA, Vig K, Baganizi DR, Sahu R, Dixit S, Dennis V, Singh SR, Pillai SR. Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Nov 25;17(12):1974. doi: 10.3390/ijms17121974. PMID 27898014
- Sharma S, Rai VK, Narang RK, Markandeywar TS. Collagen-based formulations for wound healing: A literature review. Life Sci. 2022 Feb 1;290:120096. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.120096. Epub 2021 Oct 26. PMID 34715138
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07347106 · 202506105