Menu
Recruiting NCT07330518

Comparison of Conventional Buccal Nerve Block Versus Buccal Nerve Trunk Block During Extraction of Posterior Mandibular Teeth

No phase Interventional Pain (Visceral, Somatic, or Neuropathic)

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Conventional Buccal Nerve Block, Buccal Nerve Trunk Block.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Pain (Visceral, Somatic, or Neuropathic). Basic parameters: 20 years — 60 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Pakistan
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Comparison of Conventional Buccal Nerve Block Versus Buccal Nerve Trunk Block for Anaesthesia of Buccal Mucosa During Extraction of Mandibular Posterior Teeth

Overview

This randomised control trial will compare the efficacy of conventional buccal nerve block versus buccal trunk block using visual analogue scale to evaluate pain and additional anesthesia injection during extraction of mandibular molars.

Detailed description

Dental extraction of mandibular posterior teeth require buccal mucosa anesthesia for pain free extraction. Conventional buccal nerve block is the commonly used technique for anesthesia of buccal mucosa but often is not effective and requires multiple injections. This study aims to compare coventional buccal nerve block with buccal nerve trunk block on the basis of Efficacy of local anesthesia which will be determined by need for supplemental infiltration: Use of more than 1 anesthesia cartridges during procedure will be labelled as need for supplemental infiltration.

Intraoperative pain perception: It was assessed while giving injection and during extraction of the tooth using the visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Score of more than 4 will be labelled as positive pain perception.

Interventions

  • Procedure Conventional Buccal Nerve Block
    Arm Description: Administration of anesthesia at the level of occlusion lateral to last mandibular molar. Needle is inserted until bone contact is achieved. 1ml lidocaine with 1:100000 anesthesia is administered.
  • Procedure Buccal Nerve Trunk Block
    Arm Description: Administration of anesthesia 10 mm above occlusal plane lateral to last mandibular molar. 1ml lidocaine with 1:100000 anesthesia is administered.

Primary outcome measures

  • Intraoperative pain perception [Time frame: Within 2hours of anesthesia administration]
  • Need for supplemental infiltration [Time frame: Within 2 hour of initial anesthesia administration]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 20 to 60 years
  • Patients of both gender
  • Patient requiring extraction of mandibular molars

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women
  • Pathologies associated with teeth i.e. cysts, tumors
  • Patients on radiotherapy or chemotherapy
  • Patients with mandibular fracture

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Pakistan · 1 center
  • Watim Medical College & Dental Hospital — Islamabad

Publications

  • 1.Risbaf-Fakoor S, Hashemzehi H, Jahantigh H, Arab K, Gholami L. Adjunctive low-level laser therapy using 980-nm diode laser after impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Avicenna J Clin Med. 2020; 26 (4):199-205. 2.Mahat A, Yadav R, Yadav A, Acharya P, Dongol A, Sagtani A et al. A comparative study of the effect of sutureless versus multiple sutures technique on comp

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07330518 · WM&DCR/R&D(ERB)/2023/68

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗