Menu
Recruiting NCT07328269

Effects of Mulligan Mobilization in Comparison With Maitland Mobilization in Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction.

No phase Interventional Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Mulligan Mobilization, Maitland Mobilization.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction. Basic parameters: 19 years — 44 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Pakistan
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Effects of Mulligan Mobilization in Comparison With Maitland Mobilization in Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction

Overview

The temporomandibular joint dysfunction is the second most common musculoskeletal pain after back pain, causing jaw pain, restricted movement, and joint sounds. NPRS and millimeter ruler will be used for the assessment of patient. This study will compare the effects of Mulligan and Maitland mobilization, commonly used treatment, on pain and Temporomandibular joint mobility through a randomized controlled trial, involving 30 participants divided into two groups for treatment.

Detailed description

The temporomandibular joint connects the mandible to the temporal bone near the ear's tragus and plays a key role in mastication. It involves joint or muscle pain, jaw movement limitation, and joint popping sound Risk factors include trauma, bruxism, arthritis, stress, and poor posture, while diagnosis is commonly made using the DC/TMD criteria, focusing on pain and intra-articular dysfunction. Manual therapy techniques widely used to restore joint function and reduce pain.

Among these, Mulligan's Mobilization combines therapist-applied glides with active patient movement, while Maitland mobilization uses graded oscillatory techniques to relieve pain and improve mobility.

This study aims to compare the effects of Mulligan and Maitland mobilization on pain reduction and TMJ hypomobility in adults with TMD.

A randomized controlled trial will be conducted over one year. 30 participants will be selected through purposive sampling and randomly divided into two groups.

The intervention will last two weeks, comprising 06 treatment sessions. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, after the third session, and at the end of the second week.

Treatment will include lateral, anterior, medial, and distraction glides, combined with Rocabado's 6x6 exercises to improve functional movement. Myofascial release for the temporalis and masseter muscles will also be applied.

Interventions

  • Procedure Mulligan Mobilization
    Both Mulligan and Maitland mobilization techniques with Myofascial release of temporalis and masseter and Rocabado 6\*6 exercise program are applied over a two-week period with six sessions in total, focusing on improving TMJ mobility and reducing pain. Group A Mulligan mobilization emphasizes active patient involvement combined with therapist-applied glides, including lateral, anterior, medial, and distraction glides performed for 5-10 seconds with 3-5 repetitions per session. These technique
  • Procedure Maitland Mobilization
    Group B-Maitland mobilization relies on graded oscillatory movements (Grades I-III) for 5-10 seconds with 3-5 oscillations, targeting pain relief and mobility in the pain-free range. Lower grades (I-II) are used for acute pain with gentle oscillations, while higher grades (II-III) provide moderate mobilization to improve protrusion, lateral deviation, and joint capsule mobility. And baseline treatment of myofascial release of temporalis and masseter muscle and Rocabado's 6\*6 exercise program.

Primary outcome measures

  • Pain intensity [Time frame: 2 weeks]
  • Temporomandibular joint Hypomobility [Time frame: 2 weeks]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 19-44 years.
  • Both Genders (Male and Female).
  • Patients diagnosed with TMJ hypomobility using the Manual Functional Analysis questionnaire based on DC/TMD criteria.
  • Individuals with myofascial pain, scoring above 5 on the NRS and pain upon palpation of at least two of eight masticatory and neck muscles.
  • Subjects with acute TMD and myofascial pain unrelated to active inflammation, infection, or recent trauma for at least six months.

Exclusion criteria

  • Hypermobility of TMJs.
  • Pregnancy.
  • History of rheumatic and inflammatory diseases.
  • A history of temporomandibular disorders treatment within last three months.
  • Acute trauma or injuries of face, head or cervical spine, neurological disorders, taking medication that could affect the musculoskeletal system.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Pakistan · 1 center
  • Foundation University College of Physical Therapy — Islamabad

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07328269 · FUI/CTR/2025/20

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗