Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07311616

A Study on the Effectiveness of Preventive Extensive Release of the Rotator Interval and Joint Capsule to Reduce Postoperative Stiffness in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

No phase Interventional Supraspinatus Tear

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Prophylactic extensive shoulder release and capsular release, Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Supraspinatus Tear. Basic parameters: No limits · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
China
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

The incidence of rotator cuff injuries is high, especially among the elderly. With the aging of the population, the number of surgical patients has increased significantly. However, in the early stage after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, a considerable proportion of patients are troubled by shoulder joint stiffness, which greatly affects the quality of life and satisfaction of patients after the operation. Despite this, there is still a lack of clear evidence-based medical evidence regarding whether preventive extensive shoulder release and joint capsule release during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair can effectively prevent or alleviate postoperative shoulder stiffness. To clarify this clinical issue, this project intends to conduct a single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT). Before the operation, patients will be randomly divided into two groups under blinding conditions: the experimental group will receive arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery along with preventive extensive shoulder joint release and joint capsule release, while the control group will only receive arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. After the operation, the investigators will conduct follow-up visits for 3 months, 6 months and 12 months for the two groups of patients, and perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the 12th month to assess the healing of the rotator cuff tendons. ASES score, Constant-Murley score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score and active range (ROM) assessment were conducted before the operation and at the follow-up at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the operation. The occurrence of postoperative complications of the patients was counted at the last follow-up. Through this study, the investigators expect to provide scientific and effective guidance for the prevention of postoperative adhesions of the shoulder joint.

Interventions

  • Procedure Prophylactic extensive shoulder release and capsular release
    Before rotator cuff repair, extensive release of the rotator cuff space is performed first, as well as comprehensive release of the middle glenohumeral ligament, inferior glenohumeral ligament, coracohumeral ligament, the area around the subscapularis tendon, the subacromial capsule, and the anterior and posterior inferior joint capsules.
  • Procedure Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery

Primary outcome measures

  • Shoulder Pain and Daily Functional Evaluation Measured By American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES Questionnaire) [Time frame: At baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months after the operation.]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
  • Shoulder Function Measured By Constant-Murley Score [Time frame: At baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months after the operation.]
  • Patient-Reported Shoulder Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analogue Scale (0-10 Scale) [Time frame: At Basline, 1 day after the operation, and 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation]
  • Range of Motion (ROM) [Time frame: At baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation]
  • Rate of Postoperative Complications [Time frame: At 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the operation.]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Medium to small-sized (tear size <3 cm) full-thickness supraspinatus muscle tears
  • There was no shoulder joint stiffness before the operation. The range of motion of the joint was at least 160° for passive forward flexion under ROM anesthesia, 60° for external rotation when abduction was 0°, and equal to or greater than 60° for passive internal rotation at the level of the 10th thoracic vertebra
  • About to undergo ARCR
  • No history of trauma
  • Patient consent to participate

Exclusion criteria

  • There was a history of previous surgery on the ipsilateral shoulder
  • Other injuries or lesions of the ipsilateral shoulder (such as glenohumeral arthritis, combined acromioclavicular joint dislocation, brachial plexus injury, etc.)
  • It can not be completely repaired or even repaired during operation
  • Have uncontrolled epilepsy or psychological illness
  • Patients who were assessed as not suitable for inclusion in the study group

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple blind
Primary purpose
Prevention

Study locations

China · 1 center
  • Beijing Jishuitan Hospital — Beijing

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07311616 · MR-11-25-079098

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗