Menu
Recruiting NCT07309497

Pragmatic Geriatric Assessment Before CAR-T or Bispecific Antibody Therapy to Predict Side Effects and Outcomes in Older Patients (GA-ACT Trial)

Observational Multiple Myeloma (MM), Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse (DLBCL), Lymphoma CART Therapy Bispecific Antibody Geriatric Hematology

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: pragmatic geriatric assessment, pragmatic geriatric assessment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Multiple Myeloma (MM), Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse (DLBCL), Lymphoma, CART Therapy, Bispecific Antibody, Geriatric Hematology. Basic parameters: from 65 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Switzerland
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Pragmatic Geriatric Assessment (pGA) Before Bispecific Antibody and CAR-T-Cell Therapy (GA-ACT Trial) for the Prediction of Toxicity and Outcomes in Older Patients Scheduled for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy (CAR-T-Cell-Therapy) or Bispecific Antibody (bsAB) Treatment

Overview

CAR-T cell or bispecific antibody therapies are a new treatment option for adult patients with aggressive forms of lymphoma or so-called plasma cell diseases ('multiple myeloma', 'plasma cell myeloma') that could not be cured with other, less intensive approaches. However, these are intensive therapies that can be associated with severe and potentially life-threatening side effects. Although there is no age limit for these therapies, we know little about the short- and long-term side effects of these treatments in people of advanced age. Although a small number of patients in the pivotal studies were even over 80 years old, their number was too small to be able to assess the tolerability and success specifically in people over 65. At present, the treating physicians decide whether and, if so, which patients are considered 'fit' enough for this therapy. An objective assessment of the kind we want to investigate in our study does not currently exist on a regular basis. In this study, we therefore want to use simple clinical methods to investigate the effects of these forms of therapy in different areas of everyday function that are important for people in older age (mobility, memory, self-care skills, nutrition). We want to find out whether these investigations help to predict the risk of severe and/or long-term side effects. Based on the results, a pragmatic geriatric assessment could be introduced as standard before these therapies. Older patients could thus expect an improvement in their quality of life thanks to more predictable risks and side effects. Standardized screening could lead to lower healthcare costs for treatment and aftercare for both forms of therapy.

Interventions

  • Other pragmatic geriatric assessment
    observational study
  • Other pragmatic geriatric assessment
    pragmatic geriatric assessment

Primary outcome measures

  • treatment toxicity [Time frame: From enrollment to 3 month after end of treatment]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • health related quality of life [Time frame: From enrollment to 3 month after end of treatment]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • male or female patients age ≥ 65 years,
  • scheduled for CAR-T-cell or bsAB treatments
  • signed informed consent
  • sufficient knowledge of the German or French language

Exclusion criteria

  • inability to understand or sign informed consent
  • refuse to consent

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

Switzerland · 2 centers
  • Inselspital Bern — Bern
  • Universitätsspital Zürich — Zurich

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07309497 · BASEC-No 2025-01228 · KLS-6127-08-2024-R

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗