Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07305610

INFLUENCE OF SELECTED POSITIONS ON HIP ABDUCTORS STRENGTH AND ACTIVATION IN PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN SYNDROME IN MALES

Observational Patellofemoral Pain (PFPS)

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Patellofemoral Pain (PFPS). Basic parameters: 18 years — 35 years · Male.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Egypt
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

The study aims to explore the effect of body position (side-lying versus standing) on hip abductors muscle strength and activation in individuals with and without PFPS and then to compare these measures between the two groups in each position

Detailed description

A cross-sectional comparative study involving 44 subjects (22 subjects with PFPS and 22 healthy controls), aged 18-35 years. The study will measure hip abductor muscle strength (Peak torque, Maximal total work) using the Biodex Isokinetic System 4 PRO and muscle activity (%MVC) of the gluteus medius, gluteus maximus, and tensor fascia lata using Surface EMG (Noraxon Ultium EMG). Measurements will be taken in both standing and side-lying positions.

Primary outcome measures

  • Muscle activity (%MVC) of the gluteus medius, gluteus maximus, and tensor fascia lata [Time frame: During the assessment procedure (single time point)]
  • Peak torque (Nm) of hip abductors muscles [Time frame: During the assessment procedure (single time point)]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
  • Maximal total work (J) during concentric and eccentric contractions [Time frame: During the assessment procedure (single time point)]
  • The Arabic Version of the Kujala Score (Anterior Knee Pain Scale) [Time frame: Baseline/Pre-assessment]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-35 years; Normal BMI; Subjects in the PFPS group diagnosed with unilateral PFPS by an orthopedist; Healthy individuals without knee pain (for the control group)

Exclusion criteria

  • History of lower limb surgery; Any neurological disorders; Musculoskeletal disorders affecting the lower limb; Additional sources of anterior knee pain (tendonitis, Osgood-Schlatter, bursitis, etc.); Any inflammatory diseases

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Observational model
Case-control

Study locations

Egypt · 1 center
  • Ahram Canadian University — Giza

Publications

  • de Castro MP, Sanchotene CG, Costa GV, Lopes CMS, Hubert M, de Brito Fontana H, Ruschel C. Comparison between side-lying and standing positions for hip abductor strength assessment. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2022 Apr;30:181-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.02.011. Epub 2022 Feb 12. PMID 35500969

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07305610 · Cairo University

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗