Menu
Recruiting NCT07297771

Latissimus Dorsi Activity During Different Exercises

Observational Muscle Activation

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Exercise.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Muscle Activation. Basic parameters: 18 years — 40 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Turkey (Türkiye)
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Investigation of Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Activation During Different Exercises

Overview

This single-visit, laboratory study will quantify latissimus dorsi activation during standardized band/body-weight exercises commonly used in rehabilitation (e.g., standing bent-over row, inferior glide, seated press-up, body-lifting). Healthy, physically active adults (18-40 y; Tegner ≥5) will perform three repetitions per exercise with metronome-paced phases (≈3 s concentric, 3 s isometric, 3 s eccentric), 5-s rest between repetitions and 2-min between exercises; load will be individualized to reach OMNI RPE 6-8. Surface EMG (TeleMyo DTS; Noraxon) will be recorded from the latissimus dorsi (medial and lateral) and selected synergists (teres major, infraspinatus, posterior deltoid, triceps); electrode placement will follow SENIAM recommendations. Signals will be band-pass filtered (20-500 Hz), rectified, RMS-smoothed with a 100-ms window, and normalized to %MVIC using standardized MVC tests; exercise/MVC order will be randomized to limit bias. The primary outcome is mean normalized EMG amplitude per exercise; secondary outcomes include peak amplitude and categorical activation levels (low ≤20% MVIC, moderate 21-40%, high 41-60%, very high \>60%). The study involves minimal risk (possible mild skin irritation under electrodes and transient post-exercise fatigue).

Detailed description

The latissimus dorsi (LD) originates from the spinous processes of the lower six thoracic vertebrae and the thoracolumbar fascia/iliac crest, and-together with the teres major-attaches to the medial lip of the intertubercular groove of the humerus. Functionally, LD contributes to shoulder adduction, internal rotation, and extension, linking the upper limb to the trunk. Alongside the rotator cuff, prevention of superior translation of the humeral head may be provided by the glenohumeral adductors (pectoralis major and LD) acting as humeral head depressors via a medio-inferior vector created by their tendon orientation. From an osteokinematic perspective, LD may protect against subacromial pain by facilitating inferior glide of the humeral head on the glenoid.

Selecting an appropriate strengthening exercise is critical to restore muscle performance and functional arm elevation in patients with shoulder injury or dysfunction. The literature emphasizes exercises targeting activation of the rotator cuff and scapulothoracic muscles that contribute to functional elevation. Surface electromyography (sEMG) is commonly used to guide exercise selection and progression by quantifying a muscle's contribution across different exercises, thereby enabling evidence-based advancement in strengthening programs.

However, much of the existing LD literature centers on lateral pull-down variations, with limited data for rehabilitation-relevant tasks such as low row, inferior glide, bent-over row (with trunk flexion), seated press-up, and body-lifting. Focusing on a single exercise limits clinical decision-making for shoulder rehabilitation (exercise selection and progression). Therefore, to support a scientific, evidence-based progression for LD strengthening in rehabilitation, this study was planned to obtain comprehensive sEMG data across multiple exercises.

Aim: To examine LD EMG activation levels during different exercises and determine between-exercise differences.

Interventions

  • Behavioral Exercise
    Participants will perform six standardized pulling tasks-inferior glide, low row, seated row, bent-over row, seated press-up, and body lifting-using a resistance band or body weight. Each exercise is done for 3 repetitions with \~5 s between reps and \~2 min between exercises. Resisted exercises follow a metronome-paced 3 s concentric / 3 s isometric / 3 s eccentric tempo; purely isometric tasks are held for 3 s. Load is individualized with the OMNI 0-10 scale and increased during up to 10 famil

Primary outcome measures

  • Electromyography [Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
  • Electromyography-Other muscles [Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)]
  • Activity Level [Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-40 years
  • No range-of-motion restriction at the glenohumeral joint
  • No shoulder, cervical, or lumbar region complaints/injury within the past 6 months
  • No systemic or neurological disease
  • Competent to consent and provides written informed consent
  • Tegner Activity Scale ≥ 5

Exclusion criteria

  • Body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg/m²

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Observational model
Other

Study locations

Turkey (Türkiye) · 1 center
  • Hacettepe University — Ankara

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07297771 · LDORSI-EMG

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗