Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07289529

COMPASS 65+ - Community-based Physical Activity Snacks for Healthy Aging in Overweight and Obese Aged Adults

No phase Interventional Obesity & Overweight Aged 65 Years or Older

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Group-based "Snack Exercise" Training and Prescription, Brief educational counseling session.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Obesity & Overweight, Aged 65 Years or Older. Basic parameters: from 65 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Portugal
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

This study will explore a new way for older adults to become more physically active. As people get older, it's common to gain weight and lose muscle strength. This combination can make it harder to do daily activities, increase the risk of falls, and impact overall quality of life. While we know that regular exercise is very beneficial, many older adults find it difficult to stick to traditional exercise programs due to lack of time, motivation, or energy. This research project, called COMPASS 65+, will test an innovative approach called "snack exercise." Instead of one long workout, "snack exercise" involves doing several short bouts of activity, a few minutes at a time, throughout the day. The main idea is that these short, frequent bouts of activity might be easier to fit into a daily routine and less tiring than longer exercise sessions. The purpose of this study is to see if a "snack exercise" program is a feasible and enjoyable way for adults aged 65 and over, who are overweight or obese, to improve their health. The study will be conducted in two main parts. First, the research team will talk with older adults to understand what helps or hinders them from being active to co-design the program. Second, volunteers will be randomly assigned to either a "snack exercise" group or a control group. Participants in the "snack exercise" group will attend sessions that combine theory and practice to learn how to perform these exercises and will receive individualized prescriptions to perform the "snacks" (short bouts) at home. The control group will receive a brief educational counselling session on physical activity. Participants' health status, body composition, and physical fitness will be assessed at baseline, after the 12 weeks intervention, and again 6 weeks post-intervention to evaluate the maintenance of any improvements. These outcomes will help determine whether short bouts of 'exercise snacking' constitute a feasible and effective strategy to promote functional capacity, metabolic health, and long-term adherence to physical activity.

Detailed description

Study Rationale and Background The intersection of an aging population and the obesity epidemic poses a significant public health challenge, particularly for adults aged 65 and older. This combination often leads to sarcopenic obesity, a condition characterized by excess body fat and low muscle mass and strength, which substantially increases the risk of falls, frailty, functional decline, and loss of independence. While physical activity is a proven non-pharmacological intervention to counteract these declines, adherence to traditional, structured exercise programs remains low among older adults. Barriers such as a perceived lack of time, low motivation, and fatigue create a gap between the known benefits of exercise and its practical implementation in real-world community settings.

This study, COMPASS 65+, proposes to evaluate an innovative exercise modality known as "snack exercise." This approach involves short, frequent bouts of physical activity performed throughout the day, designed to be more accessible and less burdensome than conventional exercise routines. The primary aim of this project is to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of a community-based "snack exercise" program, co-designed with input from the target population, for overweight and obese older adults. The findings are intended to provide the necessary evidence to design a future, definitive large-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Study Design

The research plan is structured in two sequential phases:

1. Phase 1: Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study This initial phase is designed to inform the development of the intervention. It involves a mixed-methods approach to identify barriers, facilitators, and preferences related to physical activity among the target population.

* Quantitative Component: A cross-sectional survey will be administered to a convenience sample of 370 adults aged 65 or older with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 25 kg/m² or greater. The survey will include validated instruments such as the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale (EBBS) and the Multimorbidity Treatment Burden Questionnaire (MTBQ). * Qualitative Component: Focus groups will be conducted with a randomly selected subset of the target population to explore user preferences for program design.The data will be integrated to co-design a "snack exercise" intervention that is evidence-based and tailored to user needs. 2. Phase 2: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) A two-arm, parallel-group feasibility RCT will be conducted to test the co-designed intervention.

* Participants: A target of 60 participants will be recruited from primary care settings. Inclusion criteria include adults aged ≥ 65 years with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m². Exclusion criteria include significant cognitive deficits, contraindications to exercise (assessed via PAR-Q+), major cardiovascular events within the last 3 months, unstable chronic disease, or severe mobility impairment. * Randomization: Participants will be randomly allocated (1:1) to either the intervention group or the control group. * Timeline: The intervention lasts 12 weeks, followed by a 6-week post-intervention "washout" period. Assessments occur at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 12 weeks), and follow-up (T2, 18 weeks). * Intervention Groups Active Comparator (Control Group): Participants will receive a single, standardized Brief Educational Counselling Session (60 minutes) at baseline (T0). Delivered by trained research personnel, this session provides foundational information on the benefits of physical activity for healthy aging and offers practical strategies for incorporating short "physical activity snacks" into daily routines. This ensures a consistent educational baseline.

Experimental Group ("Snack Exercise"): Participants will receive the standardized Brief Educational Counselling Session at baseline, followed by the Structured Community-based Physical Activity Snack Intervention. This program consists of group-based, theoretico-practical sessions held 2-3 times per week, each lasting approximately 45 minutes. Sessions are guided by a physical exercise professional and focus on explaining and practicing the prescribed snack exercises. Crucially, at the end of each session, participants are provided with an individualized physical prescription to perform at home. Exercise intensity is monitored using perceived exertion scales (BORG-OMNI), progressing from light to moderate intensity per WHO recommendations.

Study Procedures and Outcome Measures Protocol \& Ethics: The study adheres to SPIRIT guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki, with Ethics Committee approval and written informed consent required.

Outcomes \& Data Collection: Comprehensive assessments are conducted at T0, T1, and T2 using validated instruments and objective tools:

* Body Composition \& Anthropometrics: Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) for fat/lean mass and bone density; Height, Weight, BMI (kg/m\^2), and Waist Circumference. * Cardiorespiratory Fitness: One-Mile Walk Test to predict aerobic capacity (VO2 max). * Functional Fitness \& Fall Risk: The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) (assessing balance, gait speed, and chair stands) and the 30-second Chair Stand Test (muscular endurance). * Stability: Limits of stability assessed via a force platform (Physiosensing®). * Daily Physical Activity: Objectively measured using a Fitband worn for five consecutive days (step count, active minutes). * Psychosocial \& Health Status: Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES). * Multidimensional Lifestyle and Health Status (assessed via the Healthy Lifestyle Assessment Toolkit, covering cardiometabolic health, well-being, nutrition, mental health, and sleep).

Statistical Analysis Plan Primary Analysis (Feasibility): Descriptive analysis of recruitment, adherence, retention, and protocol fidelity based on the RE-AIM framework.

Secondary Analysis (Preliminary Effects): Repeated measures ANOVA or mixed models will be used to assess changes over time (T0, T1, T2) and between groups (p\< 0.05). The goal is to estimate effect sizes to power a future definitive trial.

Data Management: All analyses will be conducted using SPSS (Version 29), with appropriate handling of missing data (e.g., multiple imputation).

Interventions

  • Behavioral Group-based "Snack Exercise" Training and Prescription
    This programme consists of supervised, group-based sessions (2-3 per week, \~45 minutes each) combining concise theoretical instruction with guided practical execution of the snack-exercise protocol. Sessions are delivered by a qualified exercise professional and focus on teaching correct technique, safety, and progression of the prescribed short exercise bouts ("exercise snacks"). At the end of each session, participants receive an individualized home-based exercise prescription, tailored to t
  • Behavioral Brief educational counseling session
    A standardized brief educational counseling session delivered by trained research personnel during the baseline assessment. This session will provide foundational information on the benefits of physical activity for healthy aging and offer practical strategies for incorporating short "physical activity snacks" into daily routines. This ensures a consistent educational baseline for both study arms.

Primary outcome measures

  • Recruitment Rate (Reach) [Time frame: From the start of recruitment until the target sample size is reached (approximately 2 months).]
  • Adherence to the "Snack Exercise" Program (Effectiveness) [Time frame: Throughout the 12-week intervention period.]
  • Program Implementation Fidelity (Implementation) [Time frame: Throughout the 12-week intervention period.]
  • Participant Retention Rate [Time frame: From baseline (T0) to the final follow-up assessment (T2) at 18 weeks.]
  • Intention to Continue Exercise (Maintenance) [Time frame: At the final follow-up assessment (T2) at 18 weeks.]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
  • Multidimensional Lifestyle and Health Status [Time frame: Assessed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 12 weeks), and follow-up (T2, 18 weeks).]
  • Daily Physical Activity Patterns [Time frame: Assessed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 12 weeks), and follow-up (T2, 18 weeks).]
  • Body Composition - Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) [Time frame: Assessed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 12 weeks), and follow-up (T2, 18 weeks).]
  • Anthropometrics - Height [Time frame: Assessed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 12 weeks), and follow-up (T2, 18 weeks).]
  • Anthropometrics - Weight [Time frame: Assessed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 12 weeks), and follow-up (T2, 18 weeks).]
  • Anthropometrics - Body Mass Index (BMI) [Time frame: Assessed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 12 weeks), and follow-up (T2, 18 weeks).]
  • Anthropometrics - Waist circumference [Time frame: Assessed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 12 weeks), and follow-up (T2, 18 weeks).]
  • Cardiorespiratory Fitness [Time frame: Assessed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 12 weeks), and follow-up (T2, 18 weeks).]
  • Functional Fitness (muscular endurance) [Time frame: Assessed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 12 weeks), and follow-up (T2, 18 weeks).]
  • Functional Fitness and Fall risk - Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) [Time frame: Assessed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 12 weeks), and follow-up (T2, 18 weeks).]
  • Fall Risk and Functional stability (force platform) [Time frame: Assessed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 12 weeks), and follow-up (T2, 18 weeks).]
  • Exercise Self-Efficacy (ESES) [Time frame: Assessed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 12 weeks), and follow-up (T2, 18 weeks).]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • adults aged ≥65 years with a BMI ≥25 kg/m².

Exclusion criteria

  • significant cognitive deficits,
  • contraindications to exercise (assessed via PAR-Q+),
  • major cardiovascular events within the last 3 months,
  • unstable chronic disease,
  • severe mobility impairment.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Portugal · 1 center
  • Fernão de Magalhães Health Center — Coimbra

Publications

  • Reis F, Sa-Moura B, Guardado D, Couceiro P, Catarino L, Mota-Pinto A, Verissimo MT, Teixeira AM, Ferreira PL, Lima MP, Palavra F, Rama L, Santos L, van der Heijden RA, Goncalves CE, Cunha A, Malva JO. Development of a Healthy Lifestyle Assessment Toolkit for the General Public. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Jun 27;6:134. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00134. eCollection 2019. PMID 31316985
  • Vancea A, Iliescu M, Aivaz KA, Popescu MN, Beiu C, Spiru L. Improving Functional Capacities and Well-Being in Older Adults: Strategies in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Cureus. 2024 Aug 6;16(8):e66254. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66254. eCollection 2024 Aug. PMID 39238764
  • Rodrigues RN, Carballeira E, Silva F, Caldo-Silva A, Abreu C, Furtado GE, Teixeira AM. The Effect of a Resistance Training, Detraining and Retraining Cycle on Postural Stability and Estimated Fall Risk in Institutionalized Older Persons: A 40-Week Intervention. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Apr 22;10(5):776. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050776. PMID 35627913
  • Nuzzo JL, Pinto MD, Kirk BJC, Nosaka K. Resistance Exercise Minimal Dose Strategies for Increasing Muscle Strength in the General Population: an Overview. Sports Med. 2024 May;54(5):1139-1162. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02009-0. Epub 2024 Mar 20. PMID 38509414
  • Lee PG, Jackson EA, Richardson CR. Exercise Prescriptions in Older Adults. Am Fam Physician. 2017 Apr 1;95(7):425-432. PMID 28409595
  • Hashimoto K, Dora K, Murakami Y, Matsumura T, Yuuki IW, Yang S, Hashimoto T. Positive impact of a 10-min walk immediately after glucose intake on postprandial glucose levels. Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22662. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07312-y. PMID 40594496
  • Evans K, Abdelhafiz D, Abdelhafiz AH. Sarcopenic obesity as a determinant of cardiovascular disease risk in older people: a systematic review. Postgrad Med. 2021 Nov;133(8):831-842. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2021.1942934. Epub 2021 Jul 12. PMID 34126036
  • Eitmann S, Matrai P, Hegyi P, Balasko M, Eross B, Dorogi K, Petervari E. Obesity paradox in older sarcopenic adults - a delay in aging: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2024 Jan;93:102164. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.102164. Epub 2023 Dec 14. PMID 38103840

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07289529 · 2025.08868.SAU+

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗