Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07285616

Optimizing Graft Selection in Glaucoma Surgery: A Comparative Study of Sclera, Pericardium, and Corneal Tissue

No phase Interventional Glaucoma

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: MicroShunt with Scleral Patch Graft, MicroShunt with Corneal Patch Graft, MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch Graft.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Glaucoma. Basic parameters: 18 years — 110 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Canada
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Optimizing Graft Selection in Glaucoma Surgery

Overview

Glaucoma refers to a group of progressive optic neuropathies that lead to permanent vision loss. Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness globally. In 2020, it was estimated to affect 76 million individuals worldwide, with projections indicating this number will rise to 111.8 million by 2040. In Canada, glaucoma affects an estimated 2.7-7.5% of individuals over the age of 50, contributing substantially to the national disease burden. This condition is linked to damage of the optic nerve due to elevated intraocular pressure (IOP; raised eye pressure), which results in the loss of retinal ganglion cells. Therefore, most of the treatments are guided towards reducing the IOP either via using laser, medications or surgery. Glaucoma surgery is typically reserved for cases where IOP remains uncontrolled while on maximum tolerated medical therapy and/or where glaucoma progression warrants surgery. The goal of many glaucoma surgeries is to divert aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space, therefore reducing intraocular pressure. The device used for this purpose are the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt (Glaukos Corporation, Laguna Hills, CA, USA) (the documents will interchangeably use terms "stent" and "shunt" to refer to these devices in the text below). The device is implanted using the ab externo approach to channel fluid from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival/subtenon space. To reduce postoperative fibrosis and inhibit fibroblast activity that could obstruct flow and lead to device failure, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or mitomycin C (MMC) are administered. Additionally, a double-layered closure of conjunctiva and Tenon's is performed to minimize Tenon's migration and blockage of tenon the stents. Despite these measures, stent encapsulation and failure are still too common requiring revisions and bleb needling in 2-20% of cases within the first 12 months of follow-up. This project will involve a series of studies evaluating graft selection in PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation, focusing on donor sclera, cornea, and pericardium as patch graft materials. First, the investigators will conduct a prospective, randomized study comparing clinical outcomes between these graft types. Outcomes of interest will include surgical success rates, post-operative hypotony, tube erosion, conjunctival complications, infection, and overall device longevity. Donor sclera has long been used as a patch graft in glaucoma drainage device surgery and is associated with low erosion rates and reliable long-term results. Corneal tissue is increasingly used due to its transparency and availability through eye banks, with demonstrated safety in ocular surface reconstruction and tube coverage. Pericardium is another durable, biocompatible option, historically applied in both cardiovascular and ocular surgery, and has shown effectiveness as a patch graft in glaucoma drainage implants. This comparison will extend to both primary implantation and revision surgeries, recognizing the high clinical relevance of graft performance in complex cases. Building on these results, the investigators will then perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of graft strategies, incorporating surgical time, post-operative management, complication rates, and need for re-operation. An economic model will be developed to evaluate costs and resource utilization associated with each material, providing valuable data for policy and surgical decision-making. Finally, the investigators will conduct a patient-reported outcome (PRO) study to assess patient comfort and satisfaction with different grafts. Surveys will evaluate domains such as foreign body sensation, cosmesis, and overall satisfaction at key time points (immediate post-operative period, 1 week, 3 weeks, and 3 months). These results will highlight the patient perspective, an often underrepresented but critical factor in surgical innovation. Together, these studies will comprehensively assess graft selection from surgical, economic, and patient-centered perspectives, informing evidence-based practice in glaucoma care.

Interventions

  • Procedure MicroShunt with Scleral Patch Graft
    Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with donor scleral patch graft to cover the tube.
  • Procedure MicroShunt with Corneal Patch Graft
    Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with donor corneal patch graft to cover the tube.
  • Procedure MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch Graft
    Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with pericardial patch graft to cover the tube.

Primary outcome measures

  • Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) from Baseline to 12 Months [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Surgical Success Rate at 12 Months [Time frame: 12 months]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
  • Glaucoma medication burden [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Need for re-operation [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Bleb needling rate [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Tube/patch graft exposure or erosion [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Hypotony [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Infection [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Device survival (time to failure) [Time frame: Up to 12 months]
  • Patient-reported comfort [Time frame: Immediate postop (day 1), 1 week, 3 weeks, 3 months.]
  • Foreign body sensation [Time frame: Day 1, 1 week, 3 weeks, 3 months.]
  • Cosmesis/satisfaction [Time frame: 3 weeks and 3 months.]
  • Health care resource use [Time frame: 12 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years and older
  • Patients selected for PreserFlo microshunt surgery and XEN stent alone or in combination with cataract surgery.
  • Ability to comprehend the study procedures

Exclusion criteria

  • Unwilling or unable to give consent
  • Unable to come for scheduled post-operative visits
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Previous cyclodestructive procedures, scleral buckling procedures, or presence of silicone oil
  • Conjunctival scarring precluding a glaucoma surgery superiorly
  • Active iris neovascularization or active proliferative retinopathy
  • Vitreous in the anterior chamber for which a vitrectomy is anticipated.
  • Previous trabeculectomy, tube-shunt implantation, or surgeries that shunt aqueous outflow into the subconjunctival space

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Canada · 1 center
  • The Royal Alexandra Hospital — Edmonton

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07285616 · Pro00157655

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗