Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07267611

Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of the Arabic Version of the SAMANTA Questionnaire: A Step Toward Improved Diagnosis of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

Observational Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Heavy Menstrual Bleeding. Basic parameters: 15 years — 45 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of the Arabic Version of the SAMANTA Questionnaire: A Step Toward Improved Diagnosis of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding.

Overview

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) significantly impacts women's quality of life (QoL). However, despite the high prevalence of HMB, culturally adapted screening tools remain scarce in our locality. This study aimed to adapt and validate the Arabic version of SAMANTA questionnaire for non-pregnant women of reproductive age. HMB can primarily be a consequence of structural or functional disturbances within the reproductive system, but it may also be linked to structural and functional ailments of other bodily systems (vascular abnormalities, malignancies, or coagulation disorders) With the exact global prevalence varies from 4% to 51% across different countries and racial groups, with estimates suggesting that approximately one-third of reproductive-age women experiences HMB . HMB is defined as excessive menstrual blood loss which interferes with a woman's physical, social, emotional and/or material quality of life. It can occur alone or in combination with other symptoms. The term heavy menstrual bleeding has replaced the term menorrhagia. The gold standard for the measurement of blood in sanitary products is the extraction of hematin using a 5% sodium hydroxide solution and the estimation of the alkaline hematin content by spectrophotometry . This method is not feasible in clinical practice and has only been used in research studies. HMB can cause iron-deficiency anemia, which is among the leading causes of years lived with disability in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is also associated with a range of adverse functional outcomes, including lower productivity and income earning, reduced ability to perform daily activities, and limitations on social life and relationships. Recent research in the area of HMB has recognized the importance of measuring "patient experience" as an outcome and the National Institute of Clinical Excellence from the UK suggests that any intervention for HMB should aim to improve quality of life rather than focusing on menstrual blood loss . For women with HMB early and accurate diagnosis is important to prevent its negative consequences. However, in low resource settings, facilities are not always available. For this reason, a cheap, simple to use tool to identify women with HMB and its impact on their quality of life is needed. In the present study, we test the ability of the Arabic version of SAMANTA-Q as a simple tool to identify women with HMB.

Primary outcome measures

  • accuracy of Arabic Version of the SAMANTA Questionnaire [Time frame: baseline]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • women, from 15 to 45 years old
  • Reproductive age women

Exclusion criteria

Women with amenorrhea. Postmenopausal women. Pregnant women. Women who had given birth within the previous 6 months. Women with mental illness, or inability to make decisions or follow instructions.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Case-only

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07267611 · SAMANTA HMB

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗