Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07266636

Effects of Photobiomodulation and Electrical Stimulation Among Bell's Palsy Patients

No phase Interventional Bell's Palsy

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Photobiomodulation alongwith facial exercise, Electrical Stimulation alongwith facial exercise.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Bell's Palsy. Basic parameters: 18 years — 64 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Comparative Effect of Photobiomodulation and Electrical Stimulation on Facial Disability Among Bell's Palsy Patients

Overview

Despite promising evidence supporting both photobiomodulation (PBM) and electrical stimulation (ES) in Bell's palsy rehabilitation, key gaps remain in the literature. Few studies have directly compared these modalities under standardized conditions, especially while keeping facial exercises constant across groups. Inconsistent treatment parameters such as variations in PBM wavelength or ES intensity limit the comparability and replication of existing findings. Additionally, many studies rely on subjective outcome measures and lack structured timelines for assessing facial symmetry, neuromuscular coordination, or long-term recovery, including complications like synkinesis. These limitations highlight the need for a well-controlled comparative study to determine the more effective modality when paired with consistent facial rehabilitation exercises.

Detailed description

Bell's palsy is the most common form of lower motor neuron facial paralysis, accounting for approximately 60-75% of such cases. Although the exact cause remains unknown, it is often linked to viral infections that trigger inflammation of the facial nerve, leading to localized swelling, loss of myelin sheath, and reduced blood flow. Several factors have been identified that may increase susceptibility to the condition, including elevated blood glucose levels, poorly managed hypertension, severe pre-eclampsia, migraines, and exposure to radiation. Patients experience either partial or complete facial weakness, often accompanied by numbness, discomfort, sensitivity to sound, and changes in taste. Bell's palsy is primarily diagnosed through clinical assessment, with other potential causes being ruled out.

Among the various rehabilitative strategies, photobiomodulation (PBM) and electrical stimulation (ES) have gained significant attention. Both are non-invasive therapeutic modalities used to stimulate nerve regeneration, reduce inflammation, and promote muscle function. However, comparative studies evaluating their effectiveness in treating facial disability due to Bell's palsy remain limited. This study, therefore, aims to investigate the comparative effects of PBM and ES on facial disability in patients suffering from Bell's palsy, helping clinicians make evidence-informed decisions for optimal patient outcomes.

Physiotherapy plays a crucial role in Bell's palsy rehabilitation by targeting neuromuscular facilitation, enhancing synaptic activity, and restoring functional facial expressions. Photobiomodulation therapy, previously referred to as low-level laser therapy (LLLT), employs low-intensity lasers or light-emitting diodes (LEDs) to deliver light energy into tissues. This energy is absorbed by chromophores in cells, especially cytochrome c oxidase, triggering a cascade of biochemical events that stimulate ATP production, modulate reactive oxygen species (ROS), and reduce inflammation. These effects create a favorable environment for nerve regeneration and tissue healing.

Electrical stimulation involves applying controlled electrical currents through the skin to elicit muscle contractions. By stimulating the facial nerve or its motor endplates, ES is thought to maintain muscle tone, prevent atrophy, and potentially re-educate facial muscles through repetitive activation. Different protocols involve varying frequencies and waveforms, with surface electrodes most commonly used in clinical practice. The theoretical underpinning of both PBM and ES lies in the concept of neuroplasticity and tissue responsiveness to bioelectrical and biochemical signals. However, the optimal modality, timing, and dosage for facial nerve rehabilitation remain areas of ongoing research and debate, necessitating further empirical investigation.

Interventions

  • Radiation Photobiomodulation alongwith facial exercise
    The intervention phase will last for 5-6 weeks, with participants receiving treatment 4-5 times per week, each session lasting 30-40 minutes, under therapist supervision. PBM therapy will be administered using a low-level laser therapy (LLLT) device, with appropriate settings (e.g., wavelength, energy density, and duration). Each session will focus on treating the affected facial regions. Facial Exercise will include manual therapy aimed at improving facial muscle tone, mobility, and circulati
  • Other Electrical Stimulation alongwith facial exercise
    The intervention phase will last for 5-6 weeks, with participants receiving treatment 4-5 times per week, each session lasting 30-40 minutes, under therapist supervision. EMS will be applied to the affected facial muscles using appropriate device settings. The therapy will focus on stimulating motor function and improving muscle tone. Facial Exercise will be performed as described above in Group 1 to aid in relaxation and muscle tone restoration.

Primary outcome measures

  • House-Brackmann Facial Nerve Grading System [Time frame: Baseline After 6 weeks]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants diagnosed with idiopathic Bell's palsy by the Physicians, moderate to severe facial muscle weakness i.e. grade III-VI on the House-Brackmann scale and duration of the condition less than 2 weeks are the inclusion criteria Exclusion Criteria
  • Participants with a middle ear infection, parotid gland tumor, malignant otitis externa, tumors in the base of the lateral skull, upper motor neuron facial palsy, segmental muscle weakness, recurrent episodes of facial paralysis, polyneuropathies and Ramsay Hunt Syndrome will be excluded from the study.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Publications

  • Glass GE. Photobiomodulation: The Clinical Applications of Low-Level Light Therapy. Aesthet Surg J. 2021 May 18;41(6):723-738. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab025. PMID 33471046
  • Kim MH, Park SY. Population-based study and a scoping review for the epidemiology and seasonality in and effect of weather on Bell's palsy. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 20;11(1):16941. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96422-4. PMID 34417505
  • Rasooly D, Ioannidis JPA, Khoury MJ, Patel CJ. Family History-Wide Association Study to Identify Clinical and Environmental Risk Factors for Common Chronic Diseases. Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 1;188(8):1563-1568. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz125. PMID 31172187
  • Singh A, Deshmukh P. Bell's Palsy: A Review. Cureus. 2022 Oct 11;14(10):e30186. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30186. eCollection 2022 Oct. PMID 36397921

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07266636 · UBAS/ERB/FoRS/25/037 Kashaf

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗