Supervision in Substance Use Disorder Treatment Programs
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: FOCUS supervision strategy.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Self Efficacy, Burnout, Professional, Substance Use Disorders, Supervision. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Supervision Strategy for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Programs: A Pilot Study
Overview
Substance use disorders such as opioid addiction affect millions of adults in the United States each year, but the delivery of high-quality, effective addiction services is disrupted by organizational issues such as counselor burnout and turnover. Clinical supervisors are essential for supporting counselors in specialty addiction treatment programs, but few supervisors receive supervision-focused training. This project seeks to develop and pilot an evidence-based supervision strategy that has a high potential to enhance supervision and result in improved counselors' well-being and performance and, in turn, to improve client outcomes.
Detailed description
Substance use disorders (SUDs) such as addiction to opioids, methamphetamines and alcohol are a significant burden in the US, affecting almost 50 million individuals annually. Community specialty SUD treatment programs ("SUD programs") are a key type of SUD providers and while effective treatments for SUD exist, significant issues in the organization and delivery of SUD programs (e.g., burnout, turnover) undermine the delivery of high-quality services. Clinical supervisors are centrally positioned to support SUD counselors (frontline clinical providers) and ensure high service quality. For clinical supervisors to effectively support counselors, they need evidence-based supervision strategies. Currently, supervisors in community SUD programs receive very little training, support, and direction for supervision, and thus their supervision practices are highly variable, raising concern about the effectiveness of clinical supervision as currently provided in these programs. Evidence-based supervision strategies can help fill the gap, and evidence from child welfare settings shows they improve leadership, climate, and client outcomes. Based on our preliminary formative work with SUD providers in Arkansas, a reinforcement-based supervision strategy developed for counselors was deemed acceptable and feasible in SUD programs, and had high perceived potential to improve supervision quality, counselor well-being and performance, and client outcomes. Participants thought the structure and content of the strategy were a good fit for SUD settings. However, for a supervision strategy to be supportive of the work they do, it needs to be developed to reflect the language, case examples, and organizational factors relevant to the SUD settings. The goals of our study are to iteratively develop and refine a supervision strategy for SUD settings, and to pilot it in residential treatment programs using quality improvement and implementation science tools and approaches. Aim 1 involves leveraging previous experience developing supervision strategies and partnering with SUD providers to develop and refine the supervision strategy for SUD. Using the Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) process, we will engage SUD partners in a series of collaborative meetings to review and discuss the supervision strategy and related study materials, and to make key decisions. The output of this work will be a refined and optimized SUD supervision strategy. Aim 2 involves conducting two pilot cycles with supervisors and counselors in a sample of SUD residential treatment programs to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the supervision strategy, examine its impact on key organizational, counselor, and client outcomes, and to document barriers and facilitators for its implementation and sustained use in routine practice. This study will provide key information to inform planning and design of a future fully powered study to assess the effectiveness of the new supervision strategy in a large sample of SUD programs.
Interventions
- Other FOCUS supervision strategy
The FOCUS supervision strategy provides a strenghts-based model for supervision. It is built around three core components: (1) Five pillars for effective supervision interactions, (2) practical skills that operationalize these principles, and (3) a set of experiential activities that provide foundational learnings for staff to practice the skills around real-life situations (from which future client-specific interventions can be built). In this study, FOCUS is being tailored for SUD treatment se
Primary outcome measures
- Counselor self-efficacy [Time frame: Every 6 months for 2 years]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
- Supervisor fidelity to FOCUS [Time frame: Monthly, 2 years]
- FOCUS acceptability [Time frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years]
- FOCUS feasibility [Time frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years]
- Leadership - implementation leadership [Time frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years]
- Leadership - clinical supervision [Time frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years]
- Organizational Social Context - implementation climate [Time frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years]
- Organizational Social Context - organizational climate [Time frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years]
- Counselor functioning - burnout [Time frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years]
- Counselor performance [Time frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years]
- Organizational performance/outcomes - turnover [Time frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years]
- Organizational performance/outcomes - client treatment completion [Time frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years]
- Organizational performance/outcomes - client satisfaction [Time frame: Every 6 months, for 2 years]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Serves as a supervisor (i.e., oversee work of counselors) or counselor (i.e., directly work with clients) at a substance use treatment facility/program
- Program/facility provides residential services
Exclusion criteria
- Supervisors contracted (not employed) by the facility
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- N/A
- Model
- Single group
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
Study locations
United States · 1 center
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences — Little Rock
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07262372 · 297361 · R34DA060419